Re: Second Amendment:"Iran has the right to develop Nuclear Weapons"

"strabo" <strabo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1215823929_12789@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Topp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > "RM V2.0" <Blah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:uxNdk.248730$qk1.92835@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> "Jerry Kraus" <jkraus_1999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>
news:9f6527f8-51fc-47b5-9e60-03ecfa7152dd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>> "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
> >>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
> >>> infringed."
> >>>
> >>> Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
> >>>
> >>> Can there be any question that freedom loving Americans, everywhere,
> >>> must sup****t the right of the democratically elected Iranian
> >>> government to develop nuclear weapons?  Can there be any question
that
> >>> the Supreme Court of the United States would vote to sup****t this
> >>> right of the Iranian people and government to maintain the freedom
of
> >>> their nation against foreign invasion?  Can there be any doubt that
> >>> the NRA, American survivalists, libertarians, and good  American
> >>> Christians -- with their love of freedom and individual liberty --
> >>> are, even as we speak, gathering funds to sup****t the development of
> >>> nuclear weapons in Iran, and sending them on to the goverment of
Iran
> >>> with their love, and kind wishes?
> >>>
> >>> I hardly think so.
> >>>
> >>> Anything else, would be hypocrisy.
> >> Actually I think they do have the right to develop whatever they
want.
But
> >> with that also comes the fact that if they use it to expect the
> >> repercussions as well. I beleive the US should get out of everyone
elses
> >> affairs and mind our own damn business. If Iran shoots a nukular
missile
> > at
> >> us then we will glass them over (in a perfect world).
> >
> > So it's OK if your family gets va****ized, instead of trying to prevent
it?
>  >
>
> No, but you can't run around beating up people because they *might*
> pose a threat.

No, you beat them when you see the threat there....
For 30 years TERRORISTS harbored by these Middle East countries have
threatened the ENTIRE world.

There is no "might pose a threat".

>
>  >
> > The Whole world is so intertwined at this point, on one can stay out
of
> > anyone elses affairs of state.
>  >
>
> The world is intertwined by force of governments AND commerce.
>
> Eliminate government intervention and the world would slide into
> relative peace.

I see you don't live in the real world...
Without governement, who would pay for your food stamps???


>
>  >
> > That is the lesson learned in the 20th century...
> > We stayed out of it and it cost 2 world wars...
>  >
>
>
> WWI and WWII were caused by the combination of bankers,
> Socialists and false flag ops, the same bunch who are
> setting the stage for the next one.

Bwaaahaaaaa...What short bus do you ride....

>
> Short of overthrowing and replacing all governments there
> was no way to prevent the`aggression.

There is by nipping it at the bud....

>
>
>  >
> > We stayed out of it and it cost 2 "police actions"...
>  >
>
> Korea - A Chinese Communist sucker play. You played, you lost.

The UN Played...we tied (actually set things to what they were, adhering
to
UN resolutions)

>
> Viet Nam - The French and the British didn't stay out. They caused it.
> The USA took the fall.

Uhm...Vietnam was started way before the french and brits....
And yes, we took the fall...

>
>  >
> > We stayed out of it and a lunatic tried to take over the middle
east...
> >
>
> If you're referring to Saddam Hussein, he was a CIA puppet who played
> the game.

Yea....And space men really run the world....

>
>  >
> >
> > Sometimes you have to step up, and as Teddy R. said- speak softly, but
carry
> > a big stick.
> >
>
> But first you better know what you're doing.

We do, you don't..