"George Grapman" <sfgeorge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:jVbji.3297$bz7.2769@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> NapalmHeart wrote:
>> "tgm" <tgm3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:Yq0ji.8093$7k7.7238@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In article <1183564435.832840.316150@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> truthmonger9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 4, 10:59 am, "Bushwacker" <rocka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> Under the guise of protecting America from becoming a "surveillance
>>>>> society"
>>>>> (whatever that means) the ACLU is working to protect foreigners who
>>>>> have
>>>>> illegally invaded America, some of whom may be terrorists. The ACLU
>>>>> have
>>>>> targeted efforts to identify these foreigners, like the Real ID Act
of
>>> 2005.http://www.realnightmare.org/
>>>>> Any politician who sup****ts the effort against the effort to
identify
>>>>> those
>>>>> who broke our laws to invade America (while others waited in line)
>>>>> deserve
>>>>> to thrown out of office. I predict this election day there will be a
>>>>> massive
>>>>> revolt against these "representatives."
>>>> It's time to destroy the ACLU. They oppose anything that fights the
>>>> war on terror.
>>> So you actually like Governmental intervention in your life? You
don't
>>> mind if
>>> Governmental bureaucracies will have your personal information in who
>>> knows how
>>> many databases. They would never abuse that information or leave it
on
>>> some lap
>>> top computer that just happens to be lost or stolen.
>>>
>>> But using coordinated drivers licenses as a national ID card, quite a
>>> concept.
>>>
>>> But it doesn't do very much good if we don't sytematicly require their
>>> production. We can set up checkpoints all across the Nation where the
>>> authorities will be able to check our IDs and verify it with their
>>> National
>>> databases. They can also check our travel do***ents, oops I mean our
>>> proof of
>>> insurance and owner****p card.
>>>
>>> If any of these do***ents are suspect or otherwise out of order the
>>> authorities
>>> can take the offender down to Headquarters, sorry, I meant local
police
>>> station.
>>>
>>> There they can be interrogated, my bad, I meant to say, ask them to
>>> explain the
>>> discrepancies.
>>>
>>> I don't know why but I'm getting the urge to click my heels
together...
>>>
>>> A little off the subject here but are you aware of the machines that
can
>>> read
>>> the magnetic stripes on the back of all Drivers Licenses?
>>>
>>> Criminals know you can buy them at most any computer store. They get
>>> there
>>> hands on your Drivers license for even a couple of second or trick you
>>> into
>>> swiping your card through their machine and they know all they need to
>>> know to
>>> swipe your Identity. Your birth records your Mothers maiden name,
your
>>> Social
>>> Security number, your full name and address, even if you require
gl*****
>>> to
>>> correct your vision.
>>>
>>> Imagine the ACLU is actually trying to stop the Government from even
>>> collecting
>>> this data. How dare they try to protect our liberty against
Governmental
>>> intrusion. Here on independence day they are actually trying to keep
>>> the
>>> Fatherland, oops, my mistake, I mean our benign and enlightened
>>> Government from
>>> keeping tabs on every one of us.
>>>
>>> Damn the ACLU for trying to protect our right's and Liberty's on this,
>>> our day
>>> of Independence.
>>
>> Why do they choose to ignore the right guaranteed under the 2nd
>> Amendment?
> Why does the NRA ignore the first three words of that amendment?
They don't. When you take the statement in its entirety, examine the
comments of the authors, and compare the meaning of the words "the people"
as used in other amendments, the meaning and intent of the 2nd Amendment
is
pretty clear.
|
