Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Marijuana > Lockyer v. San ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 5 Topic 606 of 648
Post > Topic >>

Lockyer v. San Francisco, Cal.4th [No. S122923. Aug. 12,

by "Alan B. Mac Farlane" <alanb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 15, 2008 at 03:04 AM

1. Lockyer v. San Francisco, Cal.4th [No. S122923. Aug. 12, 2004.]
California Supreme Court ruling  re: agencies declaring a state law
unconstitutional or in violation of federal law.   Mayor Newsom of SF
declared he would not enforce a state law on marriage in violation of
federal law and lost in this supreme court ruling.


in article C3FDFCD6.50332%alanb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Alan B. Mac Farlane at
alanb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 3/12/08 9:34 PM:

> 
> Well guys ... 
> 
> Was just at the Cloverdale City Council ... in the Senior Center at 311
> North Main Street behind the City Hall.
> 
> Cloverdale Mayor sat silent throughout the whole proceeding, not even
doing
> the Master of Ceremonies and leading the discussion ... she is such a
> miltoast spousal abuse personality ... so sad.
> 
> What is happening is that a few claim to have VOTE FOR medical marijuana
> wanting the State Authorities to promulgate laws and regulations once
Prop
> 214 passed at 70% approval.
> 
> Well that did not happen over the past 10 years and Cloverdale is fed up
> with it.
> 
> They just do not want to look over a fence and see a medical marijuana
> garden ... that -- whooops ... children ... teenages can get into.
> 
> They regulate tobacco products in stores ... not get rid of them.
> 
> So they want to get rid of medical marijuana ... and they want to
enforce
> the Federal Drug Control Act on Interstate Commerce in the city limits
of
> Cloverdale.
> 
> They passed an ordance making medical marijuana illegal in Cloverdale.
> 
> No mention of the America with Disabilites Act ... they were sorry for
> cancer patients and the like ... but you have to go elsewhere to get
> medicine and not in Cloverdale.
> 
> If you were a black man ... you would not be able to vote in Cloverdale
for
> the Jim Crow laws ...but could vote in the County seat of Santa Rosa ..
> especially in the Sonoma County Public Healthy Deptartment ... where
your
> voting card was issued by the State of California.
> 
> As Cloverdale has found a Federal Interstate Commerce Clause that your
black
> skin is bad for children and they can regulate it like tobacco products
and
> burn the California Constitution as well as your US Constitutional
Rights
> just by making a claim ... not that it is so.
> 
> Same kind of thinking folks ...
> 
> These are the sickest people in Sonoma County I have to say ... really
stuck
> in their toddler tantrum ... and have to start legal proceedings and
have
> Cloverdale spend a million dollars on law that they have already lost.
> 
> sorry for the hard news folks.
> 
> Cloverdale is a Federal DEA One Marijuana Plant Zero Tollerance Zone.
> 
> read it here first.
> 
> sumbuddie on da watchtower
> 
> :)
>
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Cloverdale Fed Pot Police Childrens Act 2008
"Alan B. Mac Farlane  2008-03-12 21:34:15 
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 3 (Re: Cloverdale Fed Pot Police
"Alan B. Mac Farlane  2008-03-13 16:55:29 
People v. Mower (2002) 28 Cal.4th 457 (Re: Cloverdale Fed Pot
"Alan B. Mac Farlane  2008-03-13 16:56:51 
Lockyer v. San Francisco, Cal.4th [No. S122923. Aug. 12,
"Alan B. Mac Farlane  2008-03-15 03:04:25 
Re: Cloverdale Fed Pot Police Childrens Act 2008
famous21 <famous21@[EM  2008-03-16 12:39:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 22:57:36 CDT 2008.