-- I am NOT Sicilian. Sicily was invaded by the Moors.... along with the
lower half of the boot of Italy. Moroccans to you dumbass dummycrats. The
Moors killed the men and raped the women. They had dark complexions.
This
is what gives the Sicilians darker hair and skin. I am blonde hair and
blue
eyed because my family hails from Genoa Italy. The Germans invaded the
north... giving people like me the blonde hair and blue eyes. Many
Italians
deny the Moor invasion ever happened.... I believe it is because they,
like
all libs -- are racists.
John De Gennaro
"Dick "****ing" Cheney" <TheDude@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:WYydndOEmo3i13LdRVn-hQ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You might wanna lay off the bottle when you post you lush. As it get's
> later, you're headers get harder to read. K-k-k-k-k-kerry. You weren't
even
> close on this one. You missed two letters and added one that wasn't
needed.
>
> Or is it the coke, we know how you Repugs like the d-d-d-d-d-drugs.
>
> Just stay away from the wheel, don't need another manslaughter from a
repug.
>
> What a loser. If you're a fellow Sicilian, stop!!!! You're embarrassing
us.
>
> "John De Gennaro" <rhadts1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:0mHHc.10520$R36.996@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Analysis: President Kerry on Israel
> > By Gadi Dechter
> > United Press International
> > Published 7/9/2004 7:52 PM
> >
> >
> > WA****NGTON, July 9 (UPI) -- A leaked draft of the Democratic Party
> platform
> > and recent statements by John Kerry suggest that a Democratic White
House
> > would continue the Bush administration's enthusiastic sup****t for
Israeli
> > Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
> >
> > However, the decidedly cir***spect wording of these do***ents do hint
at
> > subtle, but potentially significant, differences in a Kerry
> administration's
> > likely policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
> >
> > Last month, Kerry released a position paper titled, "John Kerry:
> > Strengthening Israel's Security and Bolstering the U.S.-Israel Special
> > Relation****p." The paper was designed to assuage concerns of
pro-Israel
> > voters still rankled by Kerry's comments during the primaries, in
which
he
> > harshly criticized the Israeli construction of the barrier in the West
> Bank.
> >
> > "I know how disheartened Palestinians are by the Israeli government's
> > decision to build a barrier off the 'Green Line,' cutting deeply into
> > Palestinian areas," Kerry told members of the Arab-American Institute
in
> > October 2003, a month after he had announced his candidacy. "We do not
> need
> > another barrier to peace." He went on to say that the barrier was a
> > "provocative and counterproductive measure" that was not in Israel's
> > interest.
> >
> > Assured of the nomination, Kerry appears to have reversed his position
on
> > the West Bank barrier, which was ruled illegal Friday by the
International
> > Court of Justice. "John Kerry sup****ts the construction of Israel's
> security
> > fence to stop terrorists from entering Israel," the June statement
reads.
> > "The security fence is a legitimate act of self-defense erected in
> response
> > to the wave of terror attacks against Israeli citizens. He believes
the
> > security fence is not a matter for the International Court of
Justice."
> >
> > In a statement released Friday evening after the court's ruling, Kerry
> > reiterated his sup****t for the barrier, and said he was "deeply
> disappointed
> > by today's International Court of Justice ruling."
> >
> > Pro-Israel groups have been quick to seize on Kerry's apparent
> capitulation
> > on the barrier as a victory for Israel. The Web site of the American
> Israel
> > Public Affairs Committee, the powerful lobby group, described Kerry as
> > expressing "sup****t for the security fence that Israel is erecting
along
> the
> > West Bank."
> >
> > Well, not exactly. The security barrier is being constructed inside --
at
> > some points, deep inside -- the West Bank, not "along" it, and in his
> > statement Kerry is careful to legitimize the barrier only as a
preventive
> > measure that will stop terrorists from "entering Israel," not as de
facto
> > political border designed to annex territory, as many critics of
Israel
> > suspect. A future President Kerry could very well demand that Israel
> > re-route the barrier closer to the 1967 borders without contradicting
> > himself.
> >
> > The AIPAC Web site goes on to re****t that Kerry, in his June
statement,
> > "describes Yasser Arafat as 'a failed leader and unfit partner for
> peace,'"
> > and calls for "his total isolation."
> >
> > This is also an inaccurate paraphrasing of the senator's position. In
the
> > June statement, Kerry merely points out -- using the ambiguous present
> > perfect tense -- that he "has sup****ted (Arafat's) total isolation,"
but
> > does not explicitly call for a continuation of the Palestinian
Authority
> > chairman's restriction to his Ramallah compound by Israel.
> >
> > Ironically, the left-leaning Israeli newspaper Haaretz also misquoted
> > Kerry's statement, re****ting that Kerry "promises not to negotiate
with
> > Yasser Arafat." Kerry has made no such promise. He has merely called
for
a
> > "new, responsible Palestinian leader****p," a statement which hardly
> > precludes Arafat from remaining at the helm, especially given his
> remarkable
> > talent for political reincarnation.
> >
> > A working draft of the Democratic national platform obtained by United
> Press
> > International, which will be debated and finalized in Miami next week,
> > offers more insight into how a Kerry administration might depart from
Bush
> > foreign policy toward Israel.
> >
> > Far from disavowing future negotiation with Arafat, the platform
promises
> to
> > "demonstrate the kind of resolve to end the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict
> > that President Clinton showed." Clinton, of course, was the only
American
> > president to honor the former guerilla leader with a state visit and
to
> > welcome him to the White House.
> >
> > The platform draft does includes a demand for Palestinian reform --
"We
> will
> > work to transform the Palestinian Authority to promote new and
responsible
> > leader****p" -- though the wording is so vague as to invite any number
of
> > interpretations. The Palestinian Authority could certainly say that it
has
> > always promoted new and responsible leader****p -- particularly in the
> > Knesset.
> >
> > It's certainly possible that the party platform will undergo radical
> > revision before the Boston convention later this month, but as it
stands
> > there is no mention of the barrier, the Gaza disengagement plan or the
> > status of Jewish settlements in the occupied territories. (In his June
> > statement, Kerry does acknowledge, without endorsing, "that in light
of
> > demographic realities, a number of settlement blocks will likely
become
a
> > part of Israel.")
> >
> > Contrast this relatively tepid language with the bluntly partisan
rhetoric
> > of candidate Bush in 2000 -- "America's special relation****p with
Israel
> > precedes the peace process. And Israel's adversaries should know that
in
> my
> > administration, the special relation****p will continue, even if they
> cannot
> > bring themselves to make true peace with the Jewish state" -- and it's
> easy
> > to understand the 23 standing ovations the president received at last
> May's
> > AIPAC policy convention in Wa****ngton.
> >
> > Still, despite differences of nuance and omission, Bush and Kerry do
> appear
> > to be in accord on the most bitterly contended Israeli-Palestinian
> > disagreements: the Palestinian call for Arab refugees and their
> descendents
> > be allowed to return to their former homes inside Israel, and the
> > Palestinian demand that Israel retreat to its 1967 borders. Both
> candidates
> > are on the record as rejecting the "right of return," and both say
that
> some
> > Jewish settlement blocks in the territories will almost certainly be
> annexed
> > to Israel as part of a peace deal.
> >
> >
> > Copyright © 2001-2004 United Press International
> >
> > --
> > Let the name calling begin!!! (its all you libs have)
> >
> >
>
>
Let the name calling begin!!! (its all you libs have)
|
