"John De Gennaro" <rhadts1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:pkIHc.10591$R36.8889@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry. I was barbequing and had to hurry out before dinner burned you
> asshole.
Ah ****, the drunk has a match and propane. Don't do too much damage. An
airlift will cost you a couple thousand.
Go **** yourself.
> of a few bucks.
>
> John De Gennaro
>
>
> "Dick "****ing" Cheney" <TheDude@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:WYydndOEmo3i13LdRVn-hQ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > You might wanna lay off the bottle when you post you lush. As it get's
> > later, you're headers get harder to read. K-k-k-k-k-kerry. You weren't
> even
> > close on this one. You missed two letters and added one that wasn't
> needed.
> >
> > Or is it the coke, we know how you Repugs like the d-d-d-d-d-drugs.
> >
> > Just stay away from the wheel, don't need another manslaughter from a
> repug.
> >
> > What a loser. If you're a fellow Sicilian, stop!!!! You're
embarrassing
> us.
> >
> > "John De Gennaro" <rhadts1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:0mHHc.10520$R36.996@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Analysis: President Kerry on Israel
> > > By Gadi Dechter
> > > United Press International
> > > Published 7/9/2004 7:52 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > WA****NGTON, July 9 (UPI) -- A leaked draft of the Democratic Party
> > platform
> > > and recent statements by John Kerry suggest that a Democratic White
> House
> > > would continue the Bush administration's enthusiastic sup****t for
> Israeli
> > > Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
> > >
> > > However, the decidedly cir***spect wording of these do***ents do
hint
at
> > > subtle, but potentially significant, differences in a Kerry
> > administration's
> > > likely policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
> > >
> > > Last month, Kerry released a position paper titled, "John Kerry:
> > > Strengthening Israel's Security and Bolstering the U.S.-Israel
Special
> > > Relation****p." The paper was designed to assuage concerns of
pro-Israel
> > > voters still rankled by Kerry's comments during the primaries, in
which
> he
> > > harshly criticized the Israeli construction of the barrier in the
West
> > Bank.
> > >
> > > "I know how disheartened Palestinians are by the Israeli
government's
> > > decision to build a barrier off the 'Green Line,' cutting deeply
into
> > > Palestinian areas," Kerry told members of the Arab-American
Institute
in
> > > October 2003, a month after he had announced his candidacy. "We do
not
> > need
> > > another barrier to peace." He went on to say that the barrier was a
> > > "provocative and counterproductive measure" that was not in Israel's
> > > interest.
> > >
> > > Assured of the nomination, Kerry appears to have reversed his
position
> on
> > > the West Bank barrier, which was ruled illegal Friday by the
> International
> > > Court of Justice. "John Kerry sup****ts the construction of Israel's
> > security
> > > fence to stop terrorists from entering Israel," the June statement
> reads.
> > > "The security fence is a legitimate act of self-defense erected in
> > response
> > > to the wave of terror attacks against Israeli citizens. He believes
the
> > > security fence is not a matter for the International Court of
Justice."
> > >
> > > In a statement released Friday evening after the court's ruling,
Kerry
> > > reiterated his sup****t for the barrier, and said he was "deeply
> > disappointed
> > > by today's International Court of Justice ruling."
> > >
> > > Pro-Israel groups have been quick to seize on Kerry's apparent
> > capitulation
> > > on the barrier as a victory for Israel. The Web site of the American
> > Israel
> > > Public Affairs Committee, the powerful lobby group, described Kerry
as
> > > expressing "sup****t for the security fence that Israel is erecting
along
> > the
> > > West Bank."
> > >
> > > Well, not exactly. The security barrier is being constructed inside
--
> at
> > > some points, deep inside -- the West Bank, not "along" it, and in
his
> > > statement Kerry is careful to legitimize the barrier only as a
> preventive
> > > measure that will stop terrorists from "entering Israel," not as de
> facto
> > > political border designed to annex territory, as many critics of
Israel
> > > suspect. A future President Kerry could very well demand that Israel
> > > re-route the barrier closer to the 1967 borders without
contradicting
> > > himself.
> > >
> > > The AIPAC Web site goes on to re****t that Kerry, in his June
statement,
> > > "describes Yasser Arafat as 'a failed leader and unfit partner for
> > peace,'"
> > > and calls for "his total isolation."
> > >
> > > This is also an inaccurate paraphrasing of the senator's position.
In
> the
> > > June statement, Kerry merely points out -- using the ambiguous
present
> > > perfect tense -- that he "has sup****ted (Arafat's) total isolation,"
but
> > > does not explicitly call for a continuation of the Palestinian
Authority
> > > chairman's restriction to his Ramallah compound by Israel.
> > >
> > > Ironically, the left-leaning Israeli newspaper Haaretz also
misquoted
> > > Kerry's statement, re****ting that Kerry "promises not to negotiate
with
> > > Yasser Arafat." Kerry has made no such promise. He has merely called
for
> a
> > > "new, responsible Palestinian leader****p," a statement which hardly
> > > precludes Arafat from remaining at the helm, especially given his
> > remarkable
> > > talent for political reincarnation.
> > >
> > > A working draft of the Democratic national platform obtained by
United
> > Press
> > > International, which will be debated and finalized in Miami next
week,
> > > offers more insight into how a Kerry administration might depart
from
> Bush
> > > foreign policy toward Israel.
> > >
> > > Far from disavowing future negotiation with Arafat, the platform
> promises
> > to
> > > "demonstrate the kind of resolve to end the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict
> > > that President Clinton showed." Clinton, of course, was the only
> American
> > > president to honor the former guerilla leader with a state visit and
to
> > > welcome him to the White House.
> > >
> > > The platform draft does includes a demand for Palestinian reform --
"We
> > will
> > > work to transform the Palestinian Authority to promote new and
> responsible
> > > leader****p" -- though the wording is so vague as to invite any
number
of
> > > interpretations. The Palestinian Authority could certainly say that
it
> has
> > > always promoted new and responsible leader****p -- particularly in
the
> > > Knesset.
> > >
> > > It's certainly possible that the party platform will undergo radical
> > > revision before the Boston convention later this month, but as it
stands
> > > there is no mention of the barrier, the Gaza disengagement plan or
the
> > > status of Jewish settlements in the occupied territories. (In his
June
> > > statement, Kerry does acknowledge, without endorsing, "that in light
of
> > > demographic realities, a number of settlement blocks will likely
become
> a
> > > part of Israel.")
> > >
> > > Contrast this relatively tepid language with the bluntly partisan
> rhetoric
> > > of candidate Bush in 2000 -- "America's special relation****p with
Israel
> > > precedes the peace process. And Israel's adversaries should know
that
in
> > my
> > > administration, the special relation****p will continue, even if they
> > cannot
> > > bring themselves to make true peace with the Jewish state" -- and
it's
> > easy
> > > to understand the 23 standing ovations the president received at
last
> > May's
> > > AIPAC policy convention in Wa****ngton.
> > >
> > > Still, despite differences of nuance and omission, Bush and Kerry do
> > appear
> > > to be in accord on the most bitterly contended Israeli-Palestinian
> > > disagreements: the Palestinian call for Arab refugees and their
> > descendents
> > > be allowed to return to their former homes inside Israel, and the
> > > Palestinian demand that Israel retreat to its 1967 borders. Both
> > candidates
> > > are on the record as rejecting the "right of return," and both say
that
> > some
> > > Jewish settlement blocks in the territories will almost certainly be
> > annexed
> > > to Israel as part of a peace deal.
> > >
> > >
> > > Copyright © 2001-2004 United Press International
> > >
> > > --
> > > Let the name calling begin!!! (its all you libs have)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
