"Pisano" <kenpisano@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1030s3lud9pu3tvhl3d6lq47nk071r1272@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:50:03 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Pisano" <kenpisano@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:15rvr3tk3607oinua884qp5j49oal0lbf1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:33:02 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Pisano" <kenpisano@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:f7lvr3dsm7pu8a44dcsevo78mi204rgn36@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:19:28 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Pisano" <kenpisano@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:1oavr3h97ecbf9rr8hqrmomrum9d7gbkfg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:39:42 GMT, David Johnston <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:54:27 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It is irrefutably clear to me and others, having experienced
first
>>>>>>>>>hand
>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>awesome burden placed on the shoulders of average "majority"
>>>>>>>>>stake-holders
>>>>>>>>>in this "democracy" that the internet in particular is flooded
with
>>>>>>>>>paid
>>>>>>>>>advocates who will sell you down the river in order to pad their
>>>>>>>>>pockets.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Where do you find these people to pay you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's just what I was going to ask!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please tell me you intended that to mean you were going to ask him
and
>>>>>>not
>>>>>>me or is your ambiguity intentional?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please tell me you are not one of those people who take every
>>>>> comment you read as some kind of personal insult or attack.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hate that. :P
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not at all. Its a simple question of who you directed the question to.
>>>>If
>>>>its to me, I'm surprised since I presumed as an R.P. sup****ter, you
>>>>would
>>>>feel the same way I do regarding free speech.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I was simply making a joke, Meldon.
>>>
>>> I do that sometimes to break the tension. It disgusts me that
>>> so many people so often, it seems, fall into the ridiculous pattern of
>>> sniping at each other with childish insults and vicious name calling
>>> to the point that most any discussion on the boards are filled with
>>> vitriol. It isn't any fun. I don't like it now, and have never been
>>> one of those who do.
>>>
>>
>>I've explained why it occurs and why the vitriol is by design.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Oh, I think I have that one pretty much figured out, lol.
>
> But seriously, what is your theory?
>
Capitalism, perhaps governance itself, produces the hidden leviathan. The
phi****ng scam I described previous is a microcosm of a model which
contains
a conflict of interest. On a larger scale, this "competitive spirit", if
you
will, produces a tremendous push toward, cheating or a better description,
fraud.
Its a question of exchange of assets and value from an unsuspecting public
to those selling the s**** oil. That's not to say that genuine value
doesn't
exist, but that there's not enough genuine value to go around or to keep
an
economy competitive in a global market. The tendency is to cheat the
public.
It is completely normal and a function of a "healthy" economy. The largest
leap anyone has to make is to consider the reality of more fraud than not,
or at least, more fraud than expected.
Its im****tant to note I have not used the word "corrupt" since that might
indicate something broken. For the beneficiaries the model sound. Rather,
the correct word is fraud since this activity intentionally seeks to
deceive, in order to profit. This is the grand illusion - the hidden
leviathan is the propensity to defraud.
|
