Excerpt from letter to a conspiracy-theorist acquaintance:
I notice another subject in the background that probably
will need attention in the near future- there was an article
today in the paper about a large-scale bat die-off in the
Northeast. Front page news,no less, about a year after
it started. I don't recall the media even mentioning this
one, before.
There is a Boston University researcher, among others,
looking into it. One researcher referred to the die-off
as something "historic" happening. There is a real pattern
here- first the deaths of Tasmanian Devils, then honeybees,
now bats, all by mysterious new diseases.
I know that a Boston University student died a while back
after visiting a cave in Texas, on some kind of research
project. I think that was more than a year ago (I never seem to
have much sense of time passage, so have to check records).
Supposedly, that would have been before the first dead bats
were discovered. I suspect that there is something that the
public isn't being told- maybe they were researching earlier
than what was publicly admitted.
If that hunch is correct, there might a more ominous implication-
that what is affecting bats could conceivably cross to humans.
That kind of scenario doesn't cross the mind of most of the
public- that instead of just reading about honeybee die-offs,
it will be human being die-off some day. AIDS II.
Only "AIDS, Part 2" is NOT just for gays and blacks, but a
true, equal-op****tunity demolisher to turn our planet upside-down
in the space of a few years.
There is probably a connection among the different
species affected- either 1) effects of environmental
havoc, 2) results of irresponsible genetic manipulation and
uncontrolled research, or 3) covert biological warfare attacks
on the United States.
It is also a relevant note that widely *differing* species
are being affected, simultaneously, not just related species.
That is a sign of something far more potentially deadly.
The media, political establishment, and scientific community
are probably not capable of uncovering the truth, and
probably would not tell us, honestly, even if they knew.
Tom Keske
|
