You haven't received a response regarding an administrative hearing.
Generally, administrative hearings are a means of cir***venting a
person's right to due process. Like the fox guarding the hen house,
administrative hearings always find themselves right, even when
lacking evidence to sup****t their conclusion or when the evidence
presented is contrary to the conclusion. I have read this in texts
for lawyers and my personal experience confirms this.
So, there should be time limits set in the laws that call create the
administrative hearing procedure and when those time limits are
violated, then you can go to court.
Going to court is a horrible, time consuming thankless job. However,
if you are going to get something done then going to court is your
next step.
Spend some time in the law library and find out what the time limits
are, what paperwork you must file to obtain something like a writ of
mandamus (I think that is what is used when an administrative hearing
is unsatisfactory, but I am not a lawyer).
Good luck. The failure to respond on their part is a good sign for
you, but only if you take advantage of it. I say it is a good sign
because administrative hearings except in the most blatant cases or
where some kind of nepotism or favoritism is involved always find in
favor of the agency they represent. That they have not responded
indicates they do not believe they can justify a finding in their own
favor.
Neal
On Mar 18, 7:58 pm, "leoj_har...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <leoj_har...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> jbhFILE.com > > > March 2007 Update
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> March 18, 2007
> ----------------------
>
> 1 / Deptartment of Justice Appeal - Nearly a year waiting...
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--=AD-------------------------------
>
> I have still heard no word from the Department of Justice regarding my
> administrative appeal submitted to that office on 5/15/06.
>
> Waiting on the results of this particular appeal is holding up any and
> all future FOIPA correspondences with the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation.
>
> I will be mailing a second status request to the DOJ this month and
> will post the findings once I hear back from them.
>
> For the record, all past administrative appeals have been handled
> within a matter of weeks and so this near one year waiting period is
> quite out of the ordinary.
>
> Regarding my legal and/or my administrative efforts in general, you
> can find much information related to past
> appeals and FOIPA requests at the following
address:http://www.jbhfile.co=
m/legal_foipa.html
>
> 2 / New Article: C.A.R.E (Child Adult Restraint Education!)
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--=AD-------------------------------
>
> "It was around this above mentioned time that, while working one day
> at my father's company, I noticed there had been a new billboard
> installed directly across the street from his business. It was a
> quarter-sized billboard and not one of the standard, huge ones one can
> see lining our national freeways ... but it's impact on my mental
> state was no less effective.
> The billboards main letters read: "C.A.R.E", a very prominent four
> letter acronym that dominated the billboards main content space. A
> closer inspection, upon leaving the parking lot that same day yielded
> the details of exactly what C.A.R.E, supposedly, was. According to the
> sub text of the billboard, C.A.R.E stood for "Child Adult Restraint
> Education", a program sponsored by the Houston Sheriff's Department
> which needed no further sub text to explain that it was some sort of
> rehabilitation program for pedophiles and/or ***ual offenders.
>
> I couldn't believe it..."
>
> Read entire article
here:http://www.jbhfile.com/art_03.18.07_dialogue.sht=
ml
>
> 2 / New Article: Womanly Wants!
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--=AD-------------------------------
>
> "This is a wierd one and so it'll be discussed quite loosely here and
> with only the necessary details to convey the general idea (as you'd
> wear an elegant evening gown, really ... loosely, I mean) . Sorry for
> that shameless bit of word-play, but women's clothes and womanly
> things in general are central to the following article ...
>
> One such fantasy/wish on the part of the profiler group is to create
> the impression of my being interested in cross-dressing or that i am
> confused about masculine vs. feminine ***uality issues; a second, not
> quite as spectacular fantasy is that I'm a possible candidate for
> exploration of bi-***ual or homo***ual latent tendencies/desires.
>
> The former, the cross dressing thing, especially when coupled with a
> similarly damning set of cir***stances casting me in a possibly
> violent/criminal light, is particularly juicy as a wish list item for
> the investigators because it's a classic serial killer type profile
> trait. I've seen my fair share of movies and generally these guys
> always have some sort of hang up involving femininity and especially
> that coupled with childhood ***ual trauma. It's really almost a
> psychological cliche."
>
> Read entire article
here:http://www.jbhfile.com/art_03.11.07_dialogue.sht=
ml
>
> 3 / New Article: Other Person's Money
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--=AD-------------------------------
>
> "A few recent event's have prompted me to pen yet another brief
> article describing the ongoing threat of a possible wrongful
> incrimination attempt.
>
> I feel so compelled due to a couple instances of financial action on
> my part and this article is intended to simply be preemptory regarding
> the above stated possibilities of wrongful incrimination.
>
> It's tax time, as you all know ... and I'm as excited as anybody to be
> recieving a bit of spare change from uncle sam; i feel i've earned it.
> Anyway, instead of waiting months for my check, I've requested that a
> very long time friend, one that I trust (at least somewhat, anyway),
> allow me to deposit my IRS refund into his personal bank account via
> direct deposit, thereby allowing me to recieve the money within a
> couple weeks as opposed to months..."
>
> Read entire article
here:http://www.jbhfile.com/art_03.06.07_dialogue.sht=
ml
>
> ----
>
> the fundamental purpose of jbhfile.com is to make public, on a daily
> and weekly basis, certain of my own personal habits and practices as
> they may relate to a known and existing federal and local
> investigation of myself; furthermore, jbhfile.com do***ents legal
> efforts associated with my ongoing efforts to officially prove the
> existence of that investigation.
>
> ----
>
> THANKS!, jbh.
|
