In article <4460fad7.27295418@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "GEO" Me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> On Tue, 09 May 2006 10:28:10 GMT, Leythos <void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> Ghafoor and Belew initially assumed that the do***ent was obtained
through
> >> >> the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) --...
> >> <snip>
>
> >> >So, two terrorism sup****ters, caught in the act, by wiretaps,
fleeing
> >> >from the USA, want some form of payback?
> >> <snip>
>
> >> Where did it say that they were 'terrorism sup****ters'?
>
> >> All I read was : ' Attorneys Asim Ghafoor and Wendell Belew
defended
> >> the charity against the government's allegations that Al-Haramain
> >> Oregon was taking part in terrorist activities.'
> >
> >Do***ents were taken, the suspects left the country, and I guess you
> >missed this part:
> >
> >" The FBI's lawyers accidentally released a do***ent that showed the
> >government had used logs of conversations between the lawyers and their
> >clients, Soliman al-Buthi and the organization, to categorize Al-
> >Haramain as a terrorist group."
>
> A complicated story. It seems that the ones involved in the
> organization were 'Al-Buthi and Seda', Asim Ghafoor and Wendell Belew
> were two lawyers that have never left, and they are the ones being
> represented by Nelson:
>
> ' the FBI failed to contact both Al-Buthi
> and Seda, both now living overseas,...'
>
> (Seda gets mentioned only once, so we don't know where it fits)
It still goes back to the US Government and agencies that protect the
people of the US (and half the rest of the world) need the power to
monitor suspected bad guys, even if they are already inside the US.
Only the sheep complain, the people that have been on the giving end of
the war against terrorism don't have any problem with the snooping and
the benefit it has for America.
--
spam999free@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
999 in order to email me
|
