Try speaking ONLY TRUTH. It'll do wonders for you!!
nochains wrote:
Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:41 am
nc: > So, as a point of clarification, is one allowed to disagree
with Ray and so state or must one either agree or keep silent?
rk: There generally is no attack upon the content of my articles.
Thats a given.
nc: > If the latter then this forum becomes Ray's, not yours Shaun
and he should pay the bandwidth fees.
rk: That tactic has been used by disinformation agents before on
other forums. You guys lack originality.
nc: > While for the most part Ray makes a lot of sense there are
times when one or more of us disagree with the position or positions
he advocates.
rk: Like what. Cut and paste some actual comments you have
personally made which fit into that category.
nc: > Of course as is painfully obvious to those who read these
posts, to express that sentiment results in what in fairness can be
called nothing but an attack from Ray e.g. the former member Tim
Wingate's ordeal. Accusations of "disinformation agent" and Satanic
influence are sure to follow any comment that does anything other than
cheerlead.
rk: Where is the attack upon Wingate? I made no attack upon him.
The reason he's no longer posting and your are is because he used his
actual name, while you don't.
rk: Its funny how responsibility works, doesn't it? He wanted to
argue. I did not? I speak my Truth. Any and all can take it or
leave it. Argument is a cover for Satanic Confusion.
rk: I have said there are government/media disinformation agents
operating on this forum, most of you are too cowardly to put your real
name behind your words. Tim was not. Tim works for media. He
initiated his Satanic attack of "logical misdirections" Logical
misdirection is disinformation, is it not? That makes Tim Wingate a
media disinformation Agent in my book. I called him on it on the air
and on the forum. You saw what happened next. That was not an attack
upon tim wingate, merely an exposure. If you don't understand what I
write about, how can you possibly agree or disagree. My messages are
unassailable. If you can't see it, that's your problem. The
spiritually blind cannot see Truth so they can't attack the message,
All that is left for them is to muddle the scene with attacks upon the
messenger. Does that not leave you clearly exposed as a
disinformation agent on a smear campaign?
nc: > It would seem to me that what is good for the goose should be
good or the gander.
rk: Why not just answer the content of my articles (if you can) or
ignore them. Just don't read them.
nc: >As we all know, there has been a large influx of members and
along with that comes a increasing diversity of opinions,
rk: Yes, all anonymous and most of them with repeatable themes from
other newsgroups forums. Ignore the message, attack the messenger.
You have already learned from Shaun that some of these same
disinformation yahoos keep posting under different names and
different addresses but from same IPs.after they've been banned.
nc: > so these ground rules must be clearly defined and applicable
both ways. At what point does disagreement morph into attack? This is
a huge gray area.
rk: Try speaking ONLY TRUTH. It'll do wonders for you!!
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
*********************************************
"No other man but I in the recorded History of
mankind, including JESUS CHRIST, has directly
revealed to the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to
enslave mankind -- INTELLECTUAL THOUGHT!!"
Raymond Ronald Karczewski© http://www.arkenterprises.com
|
