On Sun, 11 May 2008 10:39:35 +0200, Zvaka****a <lalapansi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Peter H.M. Brooks wrote:
>> On May 6, 9:50 pm, "Jenicek" <Jeni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> And I bet you will start shouting again, if the church start
condemning
>>> reverse race discrimination at present in full speed in SA!
>>>
>> I don't think that it is accurate to call Black Executive Enrichment
>> and the Ethnic Cleansing of the Workplace 'reverse' race
>> discrimination - they are direct racial discriminiation. Denying
>> somebody a job that he is qualified for simply because of the colour
>> of his skin is, and always has been, racial discrimination and it is
>> wrong.
>'reverse' race discrimination..... does this mean, by implication, that
>whites are racists and blacks are reverse racists? I thought a racist
>was a racist, no matter the colour. It seems not.
Reverse racial discriminators are homophobes -- they can't stand people of
the
same race as themselves.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop
uk
|
