Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Religion in Politics > Re: Re: Califor...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 6 Topic 4614 of 5433
Post > Topic >>

Re: Re: Californicate sends a BIG FAT ****-YOU to Christstains - "BS_lng-theoCRAZY&MENTALism.gif" yEnc (1/1)

by Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 17, 2008 at 11:50 AM

"to see or not to see" wrote:

"Normal *** begats kids, which is the whole moral point of the
necessity of marriage.  Why do two male butt*****ers need to marry
except as a kind of social vanity?

Without the rules and obligations of marriage, humans are no
better than animals;  we would live in social chaos since guys would
not stick around to take care of their kids.   They would be going
around  *****ing this ho and that ho and be having kids everywhere who
would have no father to take care of them.
this is why we need marriage.  This is why marriage grew out of
***uality.  ***uality without moral rules leads to animalistic chaos.
We want moral and social order. Marriage is crucial in this regard.


If there was no marriage, mankind would invent marriage to accomodate
social and moral needs of society.
Indeed, every human community have come up with something like
marriage.
It is a human necessity to regulate ***ual energies and to provide
stability for new born kids…

If  guys wanna live together and slap each other in the ass
 don't tell me that I have to consider such behavior normal or
that it's sufficient to be regarded as the basis for marriage.


If no one slapped each other in the ass, humanity would go
on.   Ass slapping is truly arbitrary, trivial, or gratuitous. but,
***ual reproduction is the very foundation of life.  it is NOT
arbitrary. it is FUNDAMENTAL.    If there is no ***ual reproduction,
there is no human species. So marriage  serves a very
im****tant human function.    Marriage regulates and accomodates the
fact of ***ual reproduction.   Since we wanna be more than animals, we
don't just wanna have *** . We also wanna create an orderly society.
to do this, we need moral rules to govern our ***ual behavior.
marriage serves this purpose. Don't tell me that  that two guys
*****ing each other in the ass is marriage.   

If species don't ***** and ***ually reproduce, it dies out.  ***ual
reproduction is NECESSARY for humanity to go on.  and ***ual
reproduction happens between male and female.  the point of marriage
is to remind us that this male/female relation****p shouldn't only be
***ual but moral and social.  if a couple produces kids, it's THEIR
responsibility to raise the kids. they created the kids, so it's their
responsiblity. marriage is about that moral obligation.  it is not a
lifestyle game. hetero *** is real ***, real reproduction. it is
the essential basis as to why humans exist.
marriage is about the institutionalization of that fact.
hetero-*** is absolutely necessary for the species to go on. if there
was ONLY hetero-***, humanity would go on.  but, if there was only
homo-*** and no hetero-***, humanity would die out in one generation.
hetero***uality is basic, essential, fundamental, etc.    gay or homo
*** is unnecessary to humanity  it is the behavior among ***ually
defective individuals.   

Marriage is an institution that is linked with healthy ***uality as it
must be because it is
about ***ual morality.  marriage is about obligations and duties and
bonds.  when a couple enter into marriage, they are surrendering
certain freedoms and even rights.  a man without kids can do as he
pleases with his money.   but, a man with a wife and kids is morally
obligated--thru marriage vows--to spend his money for the welfare of
his wife and kids.  it's not against the law to not feed hungry kids
of someone else; it is against the law to starve your own kids.

for example, you wear gl***** and have poor eyesight.   okay, that
doesn't mean you're a bad person. but, you shouldn't expect us to
consider poor eyesight as good or healthy.  it is a defect, and one
must deal with it the best way one can.
problem is gay agenda folks will not even accept that homo***uality is
a defect.  they say it's ***ually just as legitimate as
hetero***uality. what is the rational or scientific basis for this?
what does ass-*****ing have to do with reproduction which is the
essential nature of ***uality?

all defects have disadvantages.  that's why it's called a defect.   if
you're deaf, you can't hear.  if you're blind, you can't see.  if you
have no limbs, you can't walk.  if you're gay, you can't have kids
thru gay ***.  but, they wanna force us to regard gayness as normal.
also, though they can't have kids thru gay ***, they want the right to
adopt children who were
created thru hetero-***. think about it: gay couple want kids. but,
their defective ***uality
can't produce kids.  but, they wanna pretend that it can.  so they
adopt a kid and then say 'this is OUR kid' as though they brought the
kid into this world.  

it is ***UALLY unhealthy.   a gay person can be healthy in many or
most other ways. he could be athletic, have good eating and sleeping
regimen.  so, i'm not saying a gay person is entirely unhealthy.
also, a hetero person can be a fat hideous diseased slob.  so, being
hetero doesn't mean that one is entirely healthy.
but, gay ***uality is unhealthy ***ually.  just think about it:  a
***ual organ inserted into a ******ing organ.  would you stick your
wiener up a tube full of fecal matter?

deaf-mutes are defective in hearing, and we should accept that fact.
but, deaf-mute should NOT expect the rest of us to regard deaf-
muteness as normal or healthy and qualified for positions in society
that require hearing.

similarly..

homos are defective in ***uality, and we should accept that fact. but,
homos should NOT expect the rest of us to regard homo***uality as
normal or healthy and therefore as the basis for marriage.

gay *** is defective ***.  we must not legitimiate the
defective, the unhealthy, the abnormal--if it offers no advantage.

I think when a guy has a dick but acts like he has a *****, he's
messed up.   The idea of clint eastwood in a bikini walking like a
fruitcake is NOT messed up?????  it's just 'different'?

trans are gay.  to be sure, not all gays are transvetite-ish.  some
gays are very macho and masulin.  but, they still don't emotionally
understand that their bodies were designed for ***ual union with the
other ***.  when two guys grab each other's balls and ***** each other
in
the ass, that is messed up.

I aint talking of a creator when i say 'designed'.  i'm talking
figuratively;  i mean the organs developed for those purposes.  look
at the human body and organs have purposes.  if you don't believe me,
try to see thru your ears or hear thru your nose or walk on your hair
or eat with your ass."


http://www.ihr.org/
     http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org
    http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Re: Californicate sends a BIG FAT FUCK-YOU to Christstains - "BS
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Hop  2008-05-16 08:17:53 
Re: Re: Californicate sends a BIG FAT FUCK-YOU to Christstains -
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-05-17 11:50:25 
Re: Re: Californicate sends a BIG FAT FUCK-YOU to Christstains -
"Adonis" <ze  2008-05-17 13:10:04 
Re: Re: Californicate sends a BIG FAT FUCK-YOU to Christstains -
"Pastor Frank"   2008-05-18 04:32:30 
Re: Californicate sends a BIG FAT FUCK-YOU to Christstains - "BS
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Hop  2008-05-17 16:04:41 
Re: Re: Californicate sends a BIG FAT FUCK-YOU to Christstains -
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-05-18 15:36:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 16:58:14 CST 2008.