Topaz wrote:
> "to see or not to see" wrote:
>
> "Normal *** begats kids, which is the whole moral point of the
> necessity of marriage. Why do two male butt*****ers need to marry
> except as a kind of social vanity?
>
> Without the rules and obligations of marriage, humans are no
> better than animals; we would live in social chaos since guys would
> not stick around to take care of their kids. They would be going
> around *****ing this ho and that ho and be having kids everywhere who
> would have no father to take care of them.
> this is why we need marriage. This is why marriage grew out of
> ***uality. ***uality without moral rules leads to animalistic chaos.
> We want moral and social order. Marriage is crucial in this regard.
>
>
> If there was no marriage, mankind would invent marriage to accomodate
> social and moral needs of society.
> Indeed, every human community have come up with something like
> marriage.
> It is a human necessity to regulate ***ual energies and to provide
> stability for new born kids…
>
> If guys wanna live together and slap each other in the ass
> don't tell me that I have to consider such behavior normal or
> that it's sufficient to be regarded as the basis for marriage.
>
>
> If no one slapped each other in the ass, humanity would go
> on. Ass slapping is truly arbitrary, trivial, or gratuitous. but,
> ***ual reproduction is the very foundation of life. it is NOT
> arbitrary. it is FUNDAMENTAL. If there is no ***ual reproduction,
> there is no human species. So marriage serves a very
> im****tant human function. Marriage regulates and accomodates the
> fact of ***ual reproduction. Since we wanna be more than animals, we
> don't just wanna have *** . We also wanna create an orderly society.
> to do this, we need moral rules to govern our ***ual behavior.
> marriage serves this purpose. Don't tell me that that two guys
> *****ing each other in the ass is marriage.
>
> If species don't ***** and ***ually reproduce, it dies out. ***ual
> reproduction is NECESSARY for humanity to go on. and ***ual
> reproduction happens between male and female. the point of marriage
> is to remind us that this male/female relation****p shouldn't only be
> ***ual but moral and social. if a couple produces kids, it's THEIR
> responsibility to raise the kids. they created the kids, so it's their
> responsiblity. marriage is about that moral obligation. it is not a
> lifestyle game. hetero *** is real ***, real reproduction. it is
> the essential basis as to why humans exist.
> marriage is about the institutionalization of that fact.
> hetero-*** is absolutely necessary for the species to go on. if there
> was ONLY hetero-***, humanity would go on. but, if there was only
> homo-*** and no hetero-***, humanity would die out in one generation.
> hetero***uality is basic, essential, fundamental, etc. gay or homo
> *** is unnecessary to humanity it is the behavior among ***ually
> defective individuals.
>
> Marriage is an institution that is linked with healthy ***uality as it
> must be because it is
> about ***ual morality. marriage is about obligations and duties and
> bonds. when a couple enter into marriage, they are surrendering
> certain freedoms and even rights. a man without kids can do as he
> pleases with his money. but, a man with a wife and kids is morally
> obligated--thru marriage vows--to spend his money for the welfare of
> his wife and kids. it's not against the law to not feed hungry kids
> of someone else; it is against the law to starve your own kids.
>
> for example, you wear gl***** and have poor eyesight. okay, that
> doesn't mean you're a bad person. but, you shouldn't expect us to
> consider poor eyesight as good or healthy. it is a defect, and one
> must deal with it the best way one can.
> problem is gay agenda folks will not even accept that homo***uality is
> a defect. they say it's ***ually just as legitimate as
> hetero***uality. what is the rational or scientific basis for this?
> what does ass-*****ing have to do with reproduction which is the
> essential nature of ***uality?
>
> all defects have disadvantages. that's why it's called a defect. if
> you're deaf, you can't hear. if you're blind, you can't see. if you
> have no limbs, you can't walk. if you're gay, you can't have kids
> thru gay ***. but, they wanna force us to regard gayness as normal.
> also, though they can't have kids thru gay ***, they want the right to
> adopt children who were
> created thru hetero-***. think about it: gay couple want kids. but,
> their defective ***uality
> can't produce kids. but, they wanna pretend that it can. so they
> adopt a kid and then say 'this is OUR kid' as though they brought the
> kid into this world.
>
> it is ***UALLY unhealthy. a gay person can be healthy in many or
> most other ways. he could be athletic, have good eating and sleeping
> regimen. so, i'm not saying a gay person is entirely unhealthy.
> also, a hetero person can be a fat hideous diseased slob. so, being
> hetero doesn't mean that one is entirely healthy.
> but, gay ***uality is unhealthy ***ually. just think about it: a
> ***ual organ inserted into a ******ing organ. would you stick your
> wiener up a tube full of fecal matter?
>
> deaf-mutes are defective in hearing, and we should accept that fact.
> but, deaf-mute should NOT expect the rest of us to regard deaf-
> muteness as normal or healthy and qualified for positions in society
> that require hearing.
>
> similarly..
>
> homos are defective in ***uality, and we should accept that fact. but,
> homos should NOT expect the rest of us to regard homo***uality as
> normal or healthy and therefore as the basis for marriage.
>
> gay *** is defective ***. we must not legitimiate the
> defective, the unhealthy, the abnormal--if it offers no advantage.
>
> I think when a guy has a dick but acts like he has a *****, he's
> messed up. The idea of clint eastwood in a bikini walking like a
> fruitcake is NOT messed up????? it's just 'different'?
>
> trans are gay. to be sure, not all gays are transvetite-ish. some
> gays are very macho and masulin. but, they still don't emotionally
> understand that their bodies were designed for ***ual union with the
> other ***. when two guys grab each other's balls and ***** each other
> in
> the ass, that is messed up.
>
> I aint talking of a creator when i say 'designed'. i'm talking
> figuratively; i mean the organs developed for those purposes. look
> at the human body and organs have purposes. if you don't believe me,
> try to see thru your ears or hear thru your nose or walk on your hair
> or eat with your ass."
>
>
> http://www.ihr.org/
http://www.natvan.com
>
> http://www.thebirdman.org
http://www.nsm88.com/
>
> http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
So when you are done begating children marriage has no point?
What about female that like anal ***? Ok?
--
Claude Hopper :)
? ? ¥
|
