fargo116 <fargo116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>On May 19, 6:55 am, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 17, 1:23 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >wrote:
>> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> >> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> >> >>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
<The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >>>wrote:
>> >> >>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>>
>> >> >>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for November.
>>
>> >> >>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California Supreme
Court
>> >> >>>> possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>
>> >> >>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is a
chosen
>> >> >>>> > rather
>> >> >>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to moral
>> >> >>>> > judgment.
>>
>> >> >>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
court's
>> >> >>>> > decision, while Obama will applaud it or at least remain
silent
>> >> >>>> > about it. It's your call.
>>
>> >> >>>> > ============
>>
>> >> >>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>>
>> >> >>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >> >>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>>
>> >> >>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
overturned
>> >> >>>> > a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California to
become
>> >> >>>> > the second state where gay and lesbian residents can marry.
>>
>> >> >>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying that
>> >> >>>> > domestic partner****ps are not a good enough substitute for
>> >> >>>> > marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron George.
>>
>> >> >>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two
dozen
>> >> >>>> > gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and another gay
>> >> >>>> > rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San
Francisco's
>> >> >>>> > monthlong same-*** wedding march that took place at Mayor
Gavin
>> >> >>>> > Newsom's direction.
>>
>> >> >>>> >http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-Hide
>> >> >>>> >quoted text -
>>
>> >> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> >>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying
except
>> >> >>>maybe the Crazies in the South who are going to be too busy
sitting on
>> >> >>>their hands to vote for Gramps. They are more concerned about
losing
>> >> >>>their house, losing their job, affortding a tank of gas and
affording
>> >> >>>to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind thousands of
their
>> >> >>>kids getting killed and more than half a trillion dollars of
their
>> >> >>>money thrown away.
>>
>> >> >>>S. Olson
>>
>> >> >> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>>
>> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> >> >> Is California part
>> >> >> of the South?
>>
>> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> >> >> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
>> >> >> marriages.
>>
>> >> >62% of California voters were just told that they have no right to
deny
>> >> >homo***uals the right to marry.
>>
>> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>>
>> >> >> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes, health
>> >> >> insurance or the Iraq War?
>>
>> >> >Fargo already told you. There are people in this country,
primarily in the
>> >> >South, who consider same *** marriage to threaten their well being
more than
>> >> >gas prices, job losses, home losses, the absence of health
insurance, and
>> >> >the Iraq war.
>>
>> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't respond
>> >> and your response lacks substance.
>>
>> >You really didn't 'respond' WC. Except maybe to pretend you're a fool
>> >because there seems to be this weird idea going around in connie
>> >circles that pretending to be stupid makes you look smart.
>>
>> >Newsflash: It just makes you look stupid.
>>
>> >S. Olson
>>
>> Your comment I was responding to was idiotic.
>>
>> >>nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying except
>> >>maybe the Crazies in the South
>>
>> That line was just stupid. I asked if California was in the South
>> because 62% of the voters voted against homo***ual marriages. What's
>> wrong do you have short term memory loss that you don't remember what
>> you wrote?
>
>Give us a break, WC. We all know you wrote it because you think
>pretending to be stupid makes you look smart, a weird freaking notion
>the connies have adopted because they pretend not to understand irony.
>At least for all out sakes I HOPE they are pretending.
>
>For example, how come you never point out that that 62% figure was
>before the collapse of the housing market, before we lost more than
>4,000 kids in Iraq, before the Drunken Frat Boy wasted more than half
>a trillion bucks in the wrong country and before we went into a
>recession?
>
>> Health care and the war in Iraq has nothing to do queers getting
>> married.
>
>Only in that more people care about such things than people who care
>about homo***uals getting married. They simply do. You wanna ride such
>a platform, go ahead. See how many GOP cocksuckers outside of the
>South it gets elected.
>
>It always amazes me how GOP cocksuckers can scream "leave us alone,"
>on one hand and decree which consenting adults can get married on the
>other. Typical.
>
>S. Olson
>
Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has been that way since the
beginning of history. What makes faggots so special that makes them
think they can change years of tradition? Why must we be a
civilization of deviants?
-
I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.
|
