Re: Calif. State Supreme Court Says Homo***uals Can Actually Marry (Domestic Partner****ps Not Enough)

"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...

>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>>>> The Pope Wears Prada <The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>>>
>>>>>Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>>> What does America think about?  God, gays, and guns.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for November.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>How will this ruling by a *conservative* California Supreme Court
>>>>>possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>>>>
>>>> The court is not Conservative.
>>>
>>>Yes, it is.  It is quite conservative.
>>
>> They are as Conservative as the 9th Circus Court.
>
>Wrong.  The California Supreme Court has a reputation as being moderately

>conservative.
>
>>>
>>>> Even though the majority of judges were
>>>> appointed Republican governors, they had to be approved by a
>>>> Democratic legislature.
>>>
>>>That is UNTRUE.
>>>
>>>California Supreme Court appointments are approved by the California
>>>Commission on Judicial Appointments.  The commission has three
>>>members: the Chief Justice, the Attorney General, and the senior
>>>presiding justice of the Court of Appeal of the affected appellate
>>>district.  When a Supreme Court appointee is being considered, the
>>>third member of the commission is California's senior presiding
>>>justice of the Courts of Appeal.
>>
>> Two of past AG's who could have been part of the nomination process
>> are high in the hierarchy of the California Democratic Party.
>
>"Could have been"?  ROTFLMAO!!!!
>
>Three of the four Justices were appointed by Republican governors.   Live

>with it.
>
>>
>> Let's see who voted for queer marriages:
>
>"Queer"?  You prove my point about your being a bigot.
>
>>
>> Chief Justice of he California Supreme Court is Ronald M George.
>>
>> George is occasionally floated as a candidate for justice of the
>> United States Supreme Court as a conservative acceptable to Democrats.
>> In fact, according to a July 13, 2005 article in the San Francisco
>> Chronicle, Democratic United States Senator Barbara Boxer suggested
>> George as a potential nominee for the seat on the Court vacated by
>> Sandra Day O'Connor's resignation, describing both George and his
>> fellow California Supreme Court justice, Kathryn Werdegar, as
>> "Republicans who 'reflect the spirit of Sandra Day O'Connor's tenure –
>> independent and non ideological.'"
>
>George is a moderate.
>
>>
>> Associate Justice Joyce L. Kennard is also compared to Sandra Day
>> O'Connor.
>
>Kennard is a moderate.
>
>>
>> Associate Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar has been tagged as moderate  to
>> liberal.
>
>Werdegar is a moderate.
>
>>
>> Associate Justice Carlos Moreno was put up for nomination by re-called
>> Democratic governor Gray Davis. Davis has never moved right on any
>> issue. That's why he is ex.
>
>Moreno is a moderate.
>
>>
>>
>> The point is a justice who wants too be part of the highest court  has
>> never shown their true stripes until they are in position to have the
>> final say.
>
>"...a justice...never shown their"?
>
>ROTFL -- you can't even construct a basic sentence.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> The appointees were more likely to be moderate
>>>> Republicans or appointees who wouldn't get much resistance in being
>>>> approved.
>>>>
>>>> 62% of the voters passed the California Marriage Act to outlaw same
>>>> *** marriages. 60% of the voters nationwide oppose homo***ual
>>>> marriage.
>>>
>>>Irrelevant.
>>
>> Oh. So you're saying the courts have the final say. Where were you in
>> 2000?
>
>If you are talking about the 2000 election, the SCOTUS had the final say.
>
>>
>> Wait a sec. I know where you were. You were whining about the  2000
>> election being stolen in alt.california.
>
>Cite?

Google Groups. Look up your name.  It's there. Do you deny it? Didn't
you oppose the decision of SCOTUS in the 2000 election? If you say no.
You're a liar.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is just one issue Obama-lama-ding-dong will have to state.
>>>
>>>Who is Obama-lama-ding-dong?
>>
>> Does the word Obama have any meaning?
>
>Yes.
>
>> I see sarcasm flies over your
>> pinhead and you may be too young,
>
>Fundamental disrespect is not sarcasm, nancy boy.  I realize that you 
>right-wing morons think that playing games with people's names is quite
the 
>"in" thing to do, but to those of us who want to have serious discourse,
it 
>is infantile, moronic, and tiresome.

Deal with it sissy-boy. Are you from San Francrisco?

>
>> which explains a lot, to know the
>> song "Shama lama ding dong" written by Otis Redding and performed in
>> the movie "Animal House."
>
>I probably saw "Animal House" before you were born, Pinkie.
>
Too many things go over your old pinhead. You must be a brain fried
hippy from the 60s.


>> -
>>
>> I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.
>
>You are not a liberal because you lack basic intelligence.
>
I'm was a Liberal until I started to work for a living.

>The rightwing position on gay marriage is based on bigotry, politics, and

>fundraising, not principals or “moral” values. 

It's the deviancy, Stupid!
-

I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.