VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
> fargo116 <fargo116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
>>On May 19, 6:55 am, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote:
>>> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >On May 17, 1:23 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> >> crayon...
>>>
>>> >> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>>> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>>
>>> >> >>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
>>> >> >>><The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for
>>> >> >>>> > November.
>>>
>>> >> >>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California Supreme
>>> >> >>>> Court possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is a
>>> >> >>>> > chosen rather
>>> >> >>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to
>>> >> >>>> > moral judgment.
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
>>> >> >>>> > court's decision, while Obama will applaud it or at least
>>> >> >>>> > remain silent about it. It's your call.
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > ============
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>> >> >>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
>>> >> >>>> > overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for
>>> >> >>>> > California to become the second state where gay and
>>> >> >>>> > lesbian residents can marry.
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying
>>> >> >>>> > that domestic partner****ps are not a good enough
>>> >> >>>> > substitute for marriage in an opinion written by Chief
>>> >> >>>> > Justice Ron George.
>>>
>>> >> >>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two
>>> >> >>>> > dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and
>>> >> >>>> > another gay rights group in March 2004 after the court
>>> >> >>>> > halted San Francisco's monthlong same-*** wedding march
>>> >> >>>> > that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's direction.
>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-Hide
>>> >> >>>> >quoted text -
>>>
>>> >> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> >> >>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals
>>> >> >>>marrying except maybe the Crazies in the South who are going
>>> >> >>>to be too busy sitting on their hands to vote for Gramps.
>>> >> >>>They are more concerned about losing their house, losing
>>> >> >>>their job, affortding a tank of gas and affording to go to
>>> >> >>>the doctor right about now. Never mind thousands of their
>>> >> >>>kids getting killed and more than half a trillion dollars of
>>> >> >>>their money thrown away.
>>>
>>> >> >>>S. Olson
>>>
>>> >> >> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>>>
>>> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>>
>>> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>>
>>> >> >> Is California part
>>> >> >> of the South?
>>>
>>> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>>
>>> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>>
>>> >> >> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
>>> >> >> marriages.
>>>
>>> >> >62% of California voters were just told that they have no right
>>> >> >to deny homo***uals the right to marry.
>>>
>>> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>>>
>>> >> >> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes,
>>> >> >> health insurance or the Iraq War?
>>>
>>> >> >Fargo already told you. There are people in this country,
>>> >> >primarily in the South, who consider same *** marriage to
>>> >> >threaten their well being more than gas prices, job losses,
>>> >> >home losses, the absence of health insurance, and the Iraq war.
>>>
>>> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't
>>> >> respond and your response lacks substance.
>>>
>>> >You really didn't 'respond' WC. Except maybe to pretend you're a
>>> >fool because there seems to be this weird idea going around in
>>> >connie circles that pretending to be stupid makes you look smart.
>>>
>>> >Newsflash: It just makes you look stupid.
>>>
>>> >S. Olson
>>>
>>> Your comment I was responding to was idiotic.
>>>
>>> >>nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying except
>>> >>maybe the Crazies in the South
>>>
>>> That line was just stupid. I asked if California was in the South
>>> because 62% of the voters voted against homo***ual marriages. What's
>>> wrong do you have short term memory loss that you don't remember
>>> what you wrote?
>>
>>Give us a break, WC. We all know you wrote it because you think
>>pretending to be stupid makes you look smart, a weird freaking notion
>>the connies have adopted because they pretend not to understand irony.
>>At least for all out sakes I HOPE they are pretending.
>>
>>For example, how come you never point out that that 62% figure was
>>before the collapse of the housing market, before we lost more than
>>4,000 kids in Iraq, before the Drunken Frat Boy wasted more than half
>>a trillion bucks in the wrong country and before we went into a
>>recession?
>>
>>> Health care and the war in Iraq has nothing to do queers getting
>>> married.
>>
>>Only in that more people care about such things than people who care
>>about homo***uals getting married. They simply do. You wanna ride such
>>a platform, go ahead. See how many GOP cocksuckers outside of the
>>South it gets elected.
>>
>>It always amazes me how GOP cocksuckers can scream "leave us alone,"
>>on one hand and decree which consenting adults can get married on the
>>other. Typical.
>>
>>S. Olson
>>
> Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Not in Mass. and Cal.
|
