On May 19, 10:25=A0pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
>
>
>
>
> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> >>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
> >>>> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> >>>>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
<The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>
> >>>>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>
> >>>>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for November.
>
> >>>>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California Supreme Court
> >>>>>> possibly hurt Obama in November?
>
> >>>>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is a chosen
> >>>>>> > rather
> >>>>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to moral
> >>>>>> > judgment.
>
> >>>>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the court's
> >>>>>> > decision, while Obama will applaud it or at least remain silent
> >>>>>> > about it. It's your call.
>
> >>>>>> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> >>>>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>
> >>>>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>
> >>>>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
> >>>>>> > overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California
> >>>>>> > to become the second state where gay and lesbian residents can
> >>>>>> > marry.
>
> >>>>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying that
> >>>>>> > domestic partner****ps are not a good enough substitute for
> >>>>>> > marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron George.
>
> >>>>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two dozen
> >>>>>> > gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and another gay
> >>>>>> > rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San
> >>>>>> > Francisco's monthlong same-*** wedding march that took place at
> >>>>>> > Mayor Gavin Newsom's direction.
>
> >>>>>> >http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-Hide
> >>>>>> >quoted text -
>
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >>>>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying
> >>>>>except maybe the Crazies in the South who are going to be too busy
> >>>>>sitting on their hands to vote for Gramps. They are more concerned
> >>>>>about losing their house, losing their job, affortding a tank of
> >>>>>gas and affording to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind
> >>>>>thousands of their kids getting killed and more than half a
> >>>>>trillion dollars of their money thrown away.
>
> >>>>>S. Olson
>
> >>>> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>
> >>>Uh, no. =A0Why do you ask?
>
> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>
> >Yes. =A0Your question was totally irrelevant.
>
> >>>> Is California part
> >>>> of the South?
>
> >>>Uh, no. =A0Why do you ask?
>
> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>
> >Yes. =A0Your question was totally irrelevant.
>
> >>>> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
> >>>> marriages.
>
> >>>62% of California voters were just told that they have no right to
> >>>deny homo***uals the right to marry.
>
> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>
> >The four conservative judges were appointed by Republican governors.
> >Judicial activism is a term applied by the right-wing fringe to any
judic=
ial
> >decision that it finds unappealing. =A0The ruling ensures that the law
tr=
eats
> >all Californians fairly and equally. =A0That is not judicial activism.
=
=A0I have
> >always found it puzzling why conservatives seem so hell-bent on denying
> >fundamental rights to people. =A0Throughout the years, conservatism has
> >endorsed things like slavery, segregation, homophobia, and prayer in
scho=
ol.
> >Conservatism has oppression as its core value.
>
> Democrats were the slave owners bent on keeping their slaves.
> The most famous segregationists were Democrats, George Wallace, Bull
> Connor, Ernest Hollings, Albert Gore Sr., Robert Byrd, J. William
> Fullbright and the list goes on.
>
> No one is scared of homos, there's no phobia. It's the =A0deviancy,
> stupid.
>
> The California made law, not interpret it. It rejected state marriage
> laws. California Supreme Court is an activist court. The voters of
> California were able to oust Chief Justice Rose Bird because she
> defied the voters of California. Four judges overturned 62% of the
> electorate. Those four justices should be recalled.
>
> Liberals sup****t the decay of society.
> Liberals sup****t the enemies of the United States.
> Liberals want a utopia a la George Orwell.
> Liberals sup****t free speech just as long as you agree with them.
> Liberals sup****t wealth distribution.
> Liberals sup****t Marxism.
>
>
>
> >>>> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes, health
> >>>> insurance or the Iraq War?
>
> >>>Fargo already told you. =A0There are people in this country,
primarily
> >>>in the South, who consider same *** marriage to threaten their well
> >>>being more than gas prices, job losses, home losses, the absence of
> >>>health insurance, and the Iraq war.
>
> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't respond
> >> and your response lacks substance.
>
> >Your response contains bigotry and nothing else.
>
> I find homo***uality to be deviant. You can't force me to like
> homo***uality.
No one wants to, WC.
No one wants to spread your skinny ass over the hood of car and butt-
**** you either.
> I don't need to know a person's ***ual orientation.
> They have legal unions. That should make them happy.
Would it make YOU happy? Didn't think so.
I don't give a hoot in hell if homo***uals are married. Why should
you?
S. Olson
|
