On May 20, 12:21=A0pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> fargo116 wrote:
> > On May 19, 10:25 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
> > > fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> > > >On May 19, 6:55 am, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> > > >> >On May 17, 1:23 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine
> > > >> ><Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> > > >> >> crayon...
>
> > > >> >> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
> > > >> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> > > >> >> >>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
> > > >> >> >>><The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for
> > > >> >> >>>> > November.
>
> > > >> >> >>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California
> > > >> >> >>>> Supreme Court possibly hurt Obama in November?
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is
> > > >> >> >>>> > a chosen rather
> > > >> >> >>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to
> > > >> >> >>>> > moral judgment.
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
> > > >> >> >>>> > court's decision, while Obama will applaud it or at
> > > >> >> >>>> > least remain silent about it. It's your call.
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> > > >> >> >>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
> > > >> >> >>>> > overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for
> > > >> >> >>>> > California to become the second state where gay and
> > > >> >> >>>> > lesbian residents can marry.
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday,
> > > >> >> >>>> > saying that domestic partner****ps are not a good
> > > >> >> >>>> > enough substitute for marriage in an opinion written
> > > >> >> >>>> > by Chief Justice Ron George.
>
> > > >> >> >>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco,
> > > >> >> >>>> > two dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California
> > > >> >> >>>> > and another gay rights group in March 2004 after the
> > > >> >> >>>> > court halted San Francisco's monthlong same-***
> > > >> >> >>>> > wedding march that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's
> > > >> >> >>>> > direction.
>
> > > >> >> >>>>
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-=
Hide
> > > >> >> >>>> >quoted text -
>
> > > >> >> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > >> >> >>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals
> > > >> >> >>>marrying except maybe the Crazies in the South who are
> > > >> >> >>>going to be too busy sitting on their hands to vote for
> > > >> >> >>>Gramps. They are more concerned about losing their house,
> > > >> >> >>>losing their job, affortding a tank of gas and affording
> > > >> >> >>>to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind thousands
> > > >> >> >>>of their kids getting killed and more than half a trillion
> > > >> >> >>>dollars of their money thrown away.
>
> > > >> >> >>>S. Olson
>
> > > >> >> >> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>
> > > >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>
> > > >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>
> > > >> >> >> Is California part
> > > >> >> >> of the South?
>
> > > >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>
> > > >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>
> > > >> >> >> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
> > > >> >> >> marriages.
>
> > > >> >> >62% of California voters were just told that they have no
> > > >> >> >right to deny homo***uals the right to marry.
>
> > > >> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>
> > > >> >> >> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes,
> > > >> >> >> health insurance or the Iraq War?
>
> > > >> >> >Fargo already told you. There are people in this country,
> > > >> >> >primarily in the South, who consider same *** marriage to
> > > >> >> >threaten their well being more than gas prices, job losses,
> > > >> >> >home losses, the absence of health insurance, and the Iraq
> > > >> >> >war.
>
> > > >> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't
> > > >> >> respond and your response lacks substance.
>
> > > >> >You really didn't 'respond' WC. Except maybe to pretend you're
> > > >> >a fool because there seems to be this weird idea going around
> > > >> >in connie circles that pretending to be stupid makes you look
> > > >> >smart.
>
> > > >> >Newsflash: It just makes you look stupid.
>
> > > >> >S. Olson
>
> > > >> Your comment I was responding to was idiotic.
>
> > > >> >>nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying except
> > > >> >>maybe the Crazies in the South
>
> > > >> That line was just stupid. I asked if California was in the South
> > > >> because 62% of the voters voted against homo***ual marriages.
> > > >> What's wrong do you have short term memory loss that you don't
> > > >> remember what you wrote?
>
> > > >Give us a break, WC. We all know you wrote it because you think
> > > >pretending to be stupid makes you look smart, a weird freaking
> > > >notion the connies have adopted because they pretend not to
> > > >understand irony. At least for all out sakes I HOPE they are
> > > >pretending.
>
> > > >For example, how come you never point out that that 62% figure was
> > > >before the collapse of the housing market, before we lost more than
> > > >4,000 kids in Iraq, before the Drunken Frat Boy wasted more than
> > > >half a trillion bucks in the wrong country and before we went into
> > > >a recession?
>
> > > >> Health care and the war in Iraq has nothing to do queers getting
> > > >> married.
>
> > > >Only in that more people care about such things than people who
> > > >care about homo***uals getting married. They simply do. You wanna
> > > >ride such a platform, go ahead. See how many GOP cocksuckers
> > > >outside of the South it gets elected.
>
> > > >It always amazes me how GOP cocksuckers can scream "leave us
> > > >alone," on one hand and decree which consenting adults can get
> > > >married on the other. Typical.
>
> > > >S. Olson
>
> > > Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has been that way since
> > > the beginning of history. What makes faggots so special that makes
> > > them think they can change years of tradition? Why must we be a
> > > civilization of deviants?
>
> > Whatever happened to the connie motto: "leave us alone?" You aren't
> > one of those connies who got ****ed in the ass years ago and has hated
> > himself for decades because he secretly enjoyed it, are you?
>
> > S. Olson
>
> The connies have never really believed in that "leave us alone" ****.
=A0W=
hat
> they really want is an authoritarian government that dictates the
societal=
> mores that they find acceptable while outlawing all that they find
> unacceptable. =A0Connies want to outlaw flag burning, abortion, the
teachi=
ng
> of evolution, *** education, and a plethora of other symbols of freedom
an=
d
> enlightenment while simultaneously injecting their God, their mythology,
a=
nd
> their political dogma into every aspect of American life. =A0This VRWC
dev=
iant
> is a prime example of one of them
I know. But it's fun reminding them of it when they try some of the
things WC is advocating.
S. Olson
|
