fargo116 <fargo116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>On May 20, 12:21 pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> fargo116 wrote:
>> > On May 19, 10:25 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> > wrote:
>> > > fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> > > >On May 19, 6:55 am, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> > > >wrote:
>> > > >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> > > >> >On May 17, 1:23 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine
>> > > >> ><Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > > >> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> > > >> >> crayon...
>>
>> > > >> >> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
>> > > >> >> >>><The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for
>> > > >> >> >>>> > November.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California
>> > > >> >> >>>> Supreme Court possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is
>> > > >> >> >>>> > a chosen rather
>> > > >> >> >>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to
>> > > >> >> >>>> > moral judgment.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
>> > > >> >> >>>> > court's decision, while Obama will applaud it or at
>> > > >> >> >>>> > least remain silent about it. It's your call.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > ============
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> > > >> >> >>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
>> > > >> >> >>>> > overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for
>> > > >> >> >>>> > California to become the second state where gay and
>> > > >> >> >>>> > lesbian residents can marry.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday,
>> > > >> >> >>>> > saying that domestic partner****ps are not a good
>> > > >> >> >>>> > enough substitute for marriage in an opinion written
>> > > >> >> >>>> > by Chief Justice Ron George.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco,
>> > > >> >> >>>> > two dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California
>> > > >> >> >>>> > and another gay rights group in March 2004 after the
>> > > >> >> >>>> > court halted San Francisco's monthlong same-***
>> > > >> >> >>>> > wedding march that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's
>> > > >> >> >>>> > direction.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>>
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-Hide
>> > > >> >> >>>> >quoted text -
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals
>> > > >> >> >>>marrying except maybe the Crazies in the South who are
>> > > >> >> >>>going to be too busy sitting on their hands to vote for
>> > > >> >> >>>Gramps. They are more concerned about losing their house,
>> > > >> >> >>>losing their job, affortding a tank of gas and affording
>> > > >> >> >>>to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind thousands
>> > > >> >> >>>of their kids getting killed and more than half a trillion
>> > > >> >> >>>dollars of their money thrown away.
>>
>> > > >> >> >>>S. Olson
>>
>> > > >> >> >> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>>
>> > > >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> > > >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> > > >> >> >> Is California part
>> > > >> >> >> of the South?
>>
>> > > >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> > > >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> > > >> >> >> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
>> > > >> >> >> marriages.
>>
>> > > >> >> >62% of California voters were just told that they have no
>> > > >> >> >right to deny homo***uals the right to marry.
>>
>> > > >> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>>
>> > > >> >> >> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes,
>> > > >> >> >> health insurance or the Iraq War?
>>
>> > > >> >> >Fargo already told you. There are people in this country,
>> > > >> >> >primarily in the South, who consider same *** marriage to
>> > > >> >> >threaten their well being more than gas prices, job losses,
>> > > >> >> >home losses, the absence of health insurance, and the Iraq
>> > > >> >> >war.
>>
>> > > >> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't
>> > > >> >> respond and your response lacks substance.
>>
>> > > >> >You really didn't 'respond' WC. Except maybe to pretend you're
>> > > >> >a fool because there seems to be this weird idea going around
>> > > >> >in connie circles that pretending to be stupid makes you look
>> > > >> >smart.
>>
>> > > >> >Newsflash: It just makes you look stupid.
>>
>> > > >> >S. Olson
>>
>> > > >> Your comment I was responding to was idiotic.
>>
>> > > >> >>nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying except
>> > > >> >>maybe the Crazies in the South
>>
>> > > >> That line was just stupid. I asked if California was in the
South
>> > > >> because 62% of the voters voted against homo***ual marriages.
>> > > >> What's wrong do you have short term memory loss that you don't
>> > > >> remember what you wrote?
>>
>> > > >Give us a break, WC. We all know you wrote it because you think
>> > > >pretending to be stupid makes you look smart, a weird freaking
>> > > >notion the connies have adopted because they pretend not to
>> > > >understand irony. At least for all out sakes I HOPE they are
>> > > >pretending.
>>
>> > > >For example, how come you never point out that that 62% figure was
>> > > >before the collapse of the housing market, before we lost more
than
>> > > >4,000 kids in Iraq, before the Drunken Frat Boy wasted more than
>> > > >half a trillion bucks in the wrong country and before we went into
>> > > >a recession?
>>
>> > > >> Health care and the war in Iraq has nothing to do queers getting
>> > > >> married.
>>
>> > > >Only in that more people care about such things than people who
>> > > >care about homo***uals getting married. They simply do. You wanna
>> > > >ride such a platform, go ahead. See how many GOP cocksuckers
>> > > >outside of the South it gets elected.
>>
>> > > >It always amazes me how GOP cocksuckers can scream "leave us
>> > > >alone," on one hand and decree which consenting adults can get
>> > > >married on the other. Typical.
>>
>> > > >S. Olson
>>
>> > > Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has been that way since
>> > > the beginning of history. What makes faggots so special that makes
>> > > them think they can change years of tradition? Why must we be a
>> > > civilization of deviants?
>>
>> > Whatever happened to the connie motto: "leave us alone?" You aren't
>> > one of those connies who got ****ed in the ass years ago and has
hated
>> > himself for decades because he secretly enjoyed it, are you?
>>
>> > S. Olson
>>
>> The connies have never really believed in that "leave us alone" ****.
What
>> they really want is an authoritarian government that dictates the
societal
>> mores that they find acceptable while outlawing all that they find
>> unacceptable. Connies want to outlaw flag burning, abortion, the
teaching
>> of evolution, *** education, and a plethora of other symbols of freedom
and
>> enlightenment while simultaneously injecting their God, their
mythology, and
>> their political dogma into every aspect of American life. This VRWC
deviant
>> is a prime example of one of them
>
>I know. But it's fun reminding them of it when they try some of the
>things WC is advocating.
>
>S. Olson
Thanks for confirming Liberals hate the United States of America.
-
I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.
|
