fargo116 <fargo116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>On May 19, 10:25 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> >>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> >>>> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> >>>>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
<The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >>>>>wrote:
>> >>>>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>>
>> >>>>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for November.
>>
>> >>>>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California Supreme
Court
>> >>>>>> possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>
>> >>>>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is a
chosen
>> >>>>>> > rather
>> >>>>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to moral
>> >>>>>> > judgment.
>>
>> >>>>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the court's
>> >>>>>> > decision, while Obama will applaud it or at least remain
silent
>> >>>>>> > about it. It's your call.
>>
>> >>>>>> > ============
>>
>> >>>>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>>
>> >>>>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >>>>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>>
>> >>>>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
>> >>>>>> > overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for
California
>> >>>>>> > to become the second state where gay and lesbian residents can
>> >>>>>> > marry.
>>
>> >>>>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying that
>> >>>>>> > domestic partner****ps are not a good enough substitute for
>> >>>>>> > marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron George.
>>
>> >>>>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two dozen
>> >>>>>> > gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and another gay
>> >>>>>> > rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San
>> >>>>>> > Francisco's monthlong same-*** wedding march that took place
at
>> >>>>>> > Mayor Gavin Newsom's direction.
>>
>> >>>>>> >http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-Hide
>> >>>>>> >quoted text -
>>
>> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >>>>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying
>> >>>>>except maybe the Crazies in the South who are going to be too busy
>> >>>>>sitting on their hands to vote for Gramps. They are more concerned
>> >>>>>about losing their house, losing their job, affortding a tank of
>> >>>>>gas and affording to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind
>> >>>>>thousands of their kids getting killed and more than half a
>> >>>>>trillion dollars of their money thrown away.
>>
>> >>>>>S. Olson
>>
>> >>>> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>>
>> >>>Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> >Yes. Your question was totally irrelevant.
>>
>> >>>> Is California part
>> >>>> of the South?
>>
>> >>>Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> >Yes. Your question was totally irrelevant.
>>
>> >>>> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
>> >>>> marriages.
>>
>> >>>62% of California voters were just told that they have no right to
>> >>>deny homo***uals the right to marry.
>>
>> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>>
>> >The four conservative judges were appointed by Republican governors.
>> >Judicial activism is a term applied by the right-wing fringe to any
judicial
>> >decision that it finds unappealing. The ruling ensures that the law
treats
>> >all Californians fairly and equally. That is not judicial activism.
I have
>> >always found it puzzling why conservatives seem so hell-bent on
denying
>> >fundamental rights to people. Throughout the years, conservatism has
>> >endorsed things like slavery, segregation, homophobia, and prayer in
school.
>> >Conservatism has oppression as its core value.
>>
>> Democrats were the slave owners bent on keeping their slaves.
>> The most famous segregationists were Democrats, George Wallace, Bull
>> Connor, Ernest Hollings, Albert Gore Sr., Robert Byrd, J. William
>> Fullbright and the list goes on.
>>
>> No one is scared of homos, there's no phobia. It's the deviancy,
>> stupid.
>>
>> The California made law, not interpret it. It rejected state marriage
>> laws. California Supreme Court is an activist court. The voters of
>> California were able to oust Chief Justice Rose Bird because she
>> defied the voters of California. Four judges overturned 62% of the
>> electorate. Those four justices should be recalled.
>>
>> Liberals sup****t the decay of society.
>> Liberals sup****t the enemies of the United States.
>> Liberals want a utopia a la George Orwell.
>> Liberals sup****t free speech just as long as you agree with them.
>> Liberals sup****t wealth distribution.
>> Liberals sup****t Marxism.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes, health
>> >>>> insurance or the Iraq War?
>>
>> >>>Fargo already told you. There are people in this country, primarily
>> >>>in the South, who consider same *** marriage to threaten their well
>> >>>being more than gas prices, job losses, home losses, the absence of
>> >>>health insurance, and the Iraq war.
>>
>> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't respond
>> >> and your response lacks substance.
>>
>> >Your response contains bigotry and nothing else.
>>
>> I find homo***uality to be deviant. You can't force me to like
>> homo***uality.
>
>No one wants to, WC.
>No one wants to spread your skinny ass over the hood of car and butt-
>**** you either.
>
>> I don't need to know a person's ***ual orientation.
>> They have legal unions. That should make them happy.
>
>Would it make YOU happy? Didn't think so.
>
>I don't give a hoot in hell if homo***uals are married. Why should
>you?
>
>S. Olson
In this thread I get two for one, Lamont Cranston and fargo116. Isn't
that sweet?
-
I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.
|
