Re: Calif. State Supreme Court Says Homo***uals Can Actually Marry (Domestic Partner****ps Not Enough)

"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...

>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>>>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>>>
>>>>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>>>>>> The Pope Wears Prada <The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>>>>> What does America think about?  God, gays, and guns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for November.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>How will this ruling by a *conservative* California Supreme Court
>>>>>>>possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The court is not Conservative.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, it is.  It is quite conservative.
>>>>
>>>> They are as Conservative as the 9th Circus Court.
>>>
>>>Wrong.  The California Supreme Court has a reputation as being
>>>moderately conservative.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Even though the majority of judges were
>>>>>> appointed Republican governors, they had to be approved by a
>>>>>> Democratic legislature.
>>>>>
>>>>>That is UNTRUE.
>>>>>
>>>>>California Supreme Court appointments are approved by the California
>>>>>Commission on Judicial Appointments.  The commission has three
>>>>>members: the Chief Justice, the Attorney General, and the senior
>>>>>presiding justice of the Court of Appeal of the affected appellate
>>>>>district.  When a Supreme Court appointee is being considered, the
>>>>>third member of the commission is California's senior presiding
>>>>>justice of the Courts of Appeal.
>>>>
>>>> Two of past AG's who could have been part of the nomination process
>>>> are high in the hierarchy of the California Democratic Party.
>>>
>>>"Could have been"?  ROTFLMAO!!!!
>>>
>>>Three of the four Justices were appointed by Republican governors.
>>>Live with it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Let's see who voted for queer marriages:
>>>
>>>"Queer"?  You prove my point about your being a bigot.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Chief Justice of he California Supreme Court is Ronald M George.
>>>>
>>>> George is occasionally floated as a candidate for justice of the
>>>> United States Supreme Court as a conservative acceptable to
>>>> Democrats. In fact, according to a July 13, 2005 article in the San
>>>> Francisco Chronicle, Democratic United States Senator Barbara Boxer
>>>> suggested George as a potential nominee for the seat on the Court
>>>> vacated by Sandra Day O'Connor's resignation, describing both
>>>> George and his fellow California Supreme Court justice, Kathryn
>>>> Werdegar, as "Republicans who 'reflect the spirit of Sandra Day
>>>> O'Connor's tenure – independent and non ideological.'"
>>>
>>>George is a moderate.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Associate Justice Joyce L. Kennard is also compared to Sandra Day
>>>> O'Connor.
>>>
>>>Kennard is a moderate.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Associate Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar has been tagged as moderate
>>>> to liberal.
>>>
>>>Werdegar is a moderate.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Associate Justice Carlos Moreno was put up for nomination by
>>>> re-called Democratic governor Gray Davis. Davis has never moved
>>>> right on any issue. That's why he is ex.
>>>
>>>Moreno is a moderate.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The point is a justice who wants too be part of the highest court
>>>> has never shown their true stripes until they are in position to
>>>> have the final say.
>>>
>>>"...a justice...never shown their"?
>>>
>>>ROTFL -- you can't even construct a basic sentence.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The appointees were more likely to be moderate
>>>>>> Republicans or appointees who wouldn't get much resistance in
>>>>>> being approved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 62% of the voters passed the California Marriage Act to outlaw
>>>>>> same *** marriages. 60% of the voters nationwide oppose homo***ual
>>>>>> marriage.
>>>>>
>>>>>Irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> Oh. So you're saying the courts have the final say. Where were you
>>>> in 2000?
>>>
>>>If you are talking about the 2000 election, the SCOTUS had the final
>>>say.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wait a sec. I know where you were. You were whining about the  2000
>>>> election being stolen in alt.california.
>>>
>>>Cite?
>>
>> Google Groups. Look up your name.  It's there. Do you deny it? Didn't
>> you oppose the decision of SCOTUS in the 2000 election? If you say no.
>> You're a liar.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is just one issue Obama-lama-ding-dong will have to state.
>>>>>
>>>>>Who is Obama-lama-ding-dong?
>>>>
>>>> Does the word Obama have any meaning?
>>>
>>>Yes.
>>>
>>>> I see sarcasm flies over your
>>>> pinhead and you may be too young,
>>>
>>>Fundamental disrespect is not sarcasm, nancy boy.  I realize that you
>>>right-wing morons think that playing games with people's names is
>>>quite the "in" thing to do, but to those of us who want to have
>>>serious discourse, it is infantile, moronic, and tiresome.
>>
>> Deal with it sissy-boy. Are you from San Francrisco?
>>
>>>
>>>> which explains a lot, to know the
>>>> song "Shama lama ding dong" written by Otis Redding and performed in
>>>> the movie "Animal House."
>>>
>>>I probably saw "Animal House" before you were born, Pinkie.
>>>
>> Too many things go over your old pinhead. You must be a brain fried
>> hippy from the 60s.
>>
>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.
>>>
>>>You are not a liberal because you lack basic intelligence.
>>>
>> I'm was a Liberal until I started to work for a living.
>
>Simple slogans from simple minds.
>
>>
>>>The rightwing position on gay marriage is based on bigotry, politics,
>>>and fundraising, not principals or “moral” values.
>>
>> It's the deviancy, Stupid!
>
>Who are you to decide deviancy, Stupid?  Your fundamental lack of basic 
>intelligence makes it difficult for you to make decisions about your
life, 
>let alone about someone else's. 

Homo***uality is not normal. A small percentage of the population is
homo***ual. I have the choice to consider homo***uality is not normal.
Is it so hard for you to accept people's choice's? It should be easy
to accept unless you want a Liberal Orwellian World.

-

I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.