On May 20, 5:02=A0pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 19, 10:25=A0pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >wrote:
> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> >> >On May 19, 6:55=A0am, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> >> >> >On May 17, 1:23=A0pm, VRWC Destruction Machine
<Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
crayon.=
...
>
> >> >> >> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
> >> >> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>
> >> >> >> >>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
<The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for
Novemb=
er.
>
> >> >> >> >>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California
Supreme =
Court
> >> >> >> >>>> possibly hurt Obama in November?
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is a
c=
hosen
> >> >> >> >>>> > rather
> >> >> >> >>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to
mora=
l
> >> >> >> >>>> > judgment.
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
cou=
rt's
> >> >> >> >>>> > decision, while Obama will applaud it or at least remain
s=
ilent
> >> >> >> >>>> > about it. It's your call.
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> >> >> >>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
ove=
rturned
> >> >> >> >>>> > a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California to
be=
come
> >> >> >> >>>> > the second state where gay and lesbian residents can
marry=
..
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying
th=
at
> >> >> >> >>>> > domestic partner****ps are not a good enough substitute
for=
> >> >> >> >>>> > marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron
George=
..
>
> >> >> >> >>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two
d=
ozen
> >> >> >> >>>> > gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and another
g=
ay
> >> >> >> >>>> > rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San
Fran=
cisco's
> >> >> >> >>>> > monthlong same-*** wedding march that took place at
Mayor =
Gavin
> >> >> >> >>>> > Newsom's direction.
>
> >> >> >> >>>>
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-H=
ide
> >> >> >> >>>> >quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals
marrying=
except
> >> >> >> >>>maybe the Crazies in the South who are going to be too busy
si=
tting on
> >> >> >> >>>their hands to vote for Gramps. They are more concerned
about =
losing
> >> >> >> >>>their house, losing their job, affortding a tank of gas and
af=
fording
> >> >> >> >>>to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind thousands of
t=
heir
> >> >> >> >>>kids getting killed and more than half a trillion dollars of
t=
heir
> >> >> >> >>>money thrown away.
>
> >> >> >> >>>S. Olson
>
> >> >> >> >> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>
> >> >> >> >Uh, no. =A0Why do you ask?
>
> >> >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>
> >> >> >> >> Is California part
> >> >> >> >> of the South?
>
> >> >> >> >Uh, no. =A0Why do you ask?
>
> >> >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>
> >> >> >> >> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
> >> >> >> >> marriages.
>
> >> >> >> >62% of California voters were just told that they have no
right =
to deny
> >> >> >> >homo***uals the right to marry.
>
> >> >> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>
> >> >> >> >> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes,
hea=
lth
> >> >> >> >> insurance or the Iraq War?
>
> >> >> >> >Fargo already told you. =A0There are people in this country,
pri=
marily in the
> >> >> >> >South, who consider same *** marriage to threaten their well
bei=
ng more than
> >> >> >> >gas prices, job losses, home losses, the absence of health
insur=
ance, and
> >> >> >> >the Iraq war.
>
> >> >> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't
resp=
ond
> >> >> >> and your response lacks substance.
>
> >> >> >You really didn't 'respond' WC. Except maybe to pretend you're a
fo=
ol
> >> >> >because there seems to be this weird idea going around in connie
> >> >> >circles that pretending to be stupid makes you look smart.
>
> >> >> >Newsflash: It just makes you look stupid.
>
> >> >> >S. Olson
>
> >> >> Your comment I was responding to was idiotic.
>
> >> >> >>nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying except
> >> >> >>maybe the Crazies in the South
>
> >> >> That line was just stupid. I asked if =A0California was in the
South=
> >> >> because 62% of the voters voted against homo***ual marriages.
What's=
> >> >> wrong do you have short term memory loss that you don't remember
wha=
t
> >> >> you wrote?
>
> >> >Give us a break, WC. We all know you wrote it because you think
> >> >pretending to be stupid makes you look smart, a weird freaking
notion
> >> >the connies have adopted because they pretend not to understand
irony.=
> >> >At least for all out sakes I HOPE they are pretending.
>
> >> >For example, how come you never point out that that 62% figure was
> >> >before the collapse of the housing market, before we lost more than
> >> >4,000 kids in Iraq, before the Drunken Frat Boy wasted more than
half
> >> >a trillion bucks in the wrong country and before we went into a
> >> >recession?
>
> >> >> Health care and the war in Iraq has nothing to do queers getting
> >> >> married.
>
> >> >Only in that more people care about such things than people who care
> >> >about homo***uals getting married. They simply do. You wanna ride
such=
> >> >a platform, go ahead. See how many GOP cocksuckers outside of the
> >> >South it gets elected.
>
> >> >It always amazes me how GOP cocksuckers can scream "leave us alone,"
> >> >on one hand and decree which consenting adults can get married on
the
> >> >other. Typical.
>
> >> >S. Olson
>
> >> Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has been that way since the
> >> beginning of history. What makes faggots so special that makes them
> >> think they can change years of tradition? Why must we be a
> >> civilization of deviants?
>
> >Whatever happened to the connie motto: "leave us alone?" You aren't
> >one of those connies who got ****ed in the ass years ago and has hated
> >himself for decades because he secretly enjoyed it, are you?
>
> >S. Olson
>
> Did you jump the gun and had His and His tuxes on order?
Never fails. Connies first to claim you're a socialist or a communist
but find that doesn't work as well as it did in the 50s when they
could destroy your livelihood. Then when that doesn't work, they try
and call or insinuate you're a homo***ual. Then when THAT doesn't work
they try and call or insinuate you're a pedophile. Then when THAT
don't work either, they scream and scream and scream and scream and
scream in frustrated rage. Typical connie.
Again, are you one of those guys who got butt-****ed decades agio and
has hated himself all this time because he secretly enjoyed it?
S. OIson
|
