fargo116 <fargo116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>On May 20, 5:02 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 19, 10:25 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >wrote:
>> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> >> >On May 19, 6:55 am, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 17, 1:23 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine
<Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
crayon...
>>
>> >> >> >> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
<The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >> >> >>>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for
November.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California
Supreme Court
>> >> >> >> >>>> possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is
a chosen
>> >> >> >> >>>> > rather
>> >> >> >> >>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to
moral
>> >> >> >> >>>> > judgment.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
court's
>> >> >> >> >>>> > decision, while Obama will applaud it or at least
remain silent
>> >> >> >> >>>> > about it. It's your call.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > ============
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >> >> >> >>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
overturned
>> >> >> >> >>>> > a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California to
become
>> >> >> >> >>>> > the second state where gay and lesbian residents can
marry.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying
that
>> >> >> >> >>>> > domestic partner****ps are not a good enough substitute
for
>> >> >> >> >>>> > marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron
George.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco,
two dozen
>> >> >> >> >>>> > gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and
another gay
>> >> >> >> >>>> > rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San
Francisco's
>> >> >> >> >>>> > monthlong same-*** wedding march that took place at
Mayor Gavin
>> >> >> >> >>>> > Newsom's direction.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-Hide
>> >> >> >> >>>> >quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals
marrying except
>> >> >> >> >>>maybe the Crazies in the South who are going to be too busy
sitting on
>> >> >> >> >>>their hands to vote for Gramps. They are more concerned
about losing
>> >> >> >> >>>their house, losing their job, affortding a tank of gas and
affording
>> >> >> >> >>>to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind thousands
of their
>> >> >> >> >>>kids getting killed and more than half a trillion dollars
of their
>> >> >> >> >>>money thrown away.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>S. Olson
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> >> >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Is California part
>> >> >> >> >> of the South?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
>>
>> >> >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
>> >> >> >> >> marriages.
>>
>> >> >> >> >62% of California voters were just told that they have no
right to deny
>> >> >> >> >homo***uals the right to marry.
>>
>> >> >> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes,
health
>> >> >> >> >> insurance or the Iraq War?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Fargo already told you. There are people in this country,
primarily in the
>> >> >> >> >South, who consider same *** marriage to threaten their well
being more than
>> >> >> >> >gas prices, job losses, home losses, the absence of health
insurance, and
>> >> >> >> >the Iraq war.
>>
>> >> >> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't
respond
>> >> >> >> and your response lacks substance.
>>
>> >> >> >You really didn't 'respond' WC. Except maybe to pretend you're a
fool
>> >> >> >because there seems to be this weird idea going around in connie
>> >> >> >circles that pretending to be stupid makes you look smart.
>>
>> >> >> >Newsflash: It just makes you look stupid.
>>
>> >> >> >S. Olson
>>
>> >> >> Your comment I was responding to was idiotic.
>>
>> >> >> >>nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying except
>> >> >> >>maybe the Crazies in the South
>>
>> >> >> That line was just stupid. I asked if California was in the
South
>> >> >> because 62% of the voters voted against homo***ual marriages.
What's
>> >> >> wrong do you have short term memory loss that you don't remember
what
>> >> >> you wrote?
>>
>> >> >Give us a break, WC. We all know you wrote it because you think
>> >> >pretending to be stupid makes you look smart, a weird freaking
notion
>> >> >the connies have adopted because they pretend not to understand
irony.
>> >> >At least for all out sakes I HOPE they are pretending.
>>
>> >> >For example, how come you never point out that that 62% figure was
>> >> >before the collapse of the housing market, before we lost more than
>> >> >4,000 kids in Iraq, before the Drunken Frat Boy wasted more than
half
>> >> >a trillion bucks in the wrong country and before we went into a
>> >> >recession?
>>
>> >> >> Health care and the war in Iraq has nothing to do queers getting
>> >> >> married.
>>
>> >> >Only in that more people care about such things than people who
care
>> >> >about homo***uals getting married. They simply do. You wanna ride
such
>> >> >a platform, go ahead. See how many GOP cocksuckers outside of the
>> >> >South it gets elected.
>>
>> >> >It always amazes me how GOP cocksuckers can scream "leave us
alone,"
>> >> >on one hand and decree which consenting adults can get married on
the
>> >> >other. Typical.
>>
>> >> >S. Olson
>>
>> >> Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has been that way since
the
>> >> beginning of history. What makes faggots so special that makes them
>> >> think they can change years of tradition? Why must we be a
>> >> civilization of deviants?
>>
>> >Whatever happened to the connie motto: "leave us alone?" You aren't
>> >one of those connies who got ****ed in the ass years ago and has hated
>> >himself for decades because he secretly enjoyed it, are you?
>>
>> >S. Olson
>>
>> Did you jump the gun and had His and His tuxes on order?
>
>Never fails. Connies first to claim you're a socialist or a communist
>but find that doesn't work as well as it did in the 50s when they
>could destroy your livelihood. Then when that doesn't work, they try
>and call or insinuate you're a homo***ual. Then when THAT doesn't work
>they try and call or insinuate you're a pedophile. Then when THAT
>don't work either, they scream and scream and scream and scream and
>scream in frustrated rage. Typical connie.
>
>Again, are you one of those guys who got butt-****ed decades agio and
>has hated himself all this time because he secretly enjoyed it?
>
>S. OIson
You'll have to put those His and His tuxes on hold. One of you guys
will have to carry the bouquet down the aisle.
-
I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.
|
