Re: Calif. State Supreme Court Says Homo***uals Can Actually Marry (Domestic Partner****ps Not Enough)

"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...

>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>
>>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>>>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>>>
>>>>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>>>>>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>> crayon...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
>>>>>>>> fargo116 <fargo116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
>>>>>>>>><The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for
>>>>>>>>>> > November.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California Supreme
>>>>>>>>>> Court possibly hurt Obama in November?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is a
>>>>>>>>>> > chosen rather
>>>>>>>>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to moral
>>>>>>>>>> > judgment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
>>>>>>>>>> > court's decision, while Obama will applaud it or at least
>>>>>>>>>> > remain silent about it. It's your call.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > ============
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>>>>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
>>>>>>>>>> > overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for
>>>>>>>>>> > California to become the second state where gay and lesbian
>>>>>>>>>> > residents can marry.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying that
>>>>>>>>>> > domestic partner****ps are not a good enough substitute for
>>>>>>>>>> > marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron George.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two
>>>>>>>>>> > dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and
>>>>>>>>>> > another gay rights group in March 2004 after the court
>>>>>>>>>> > halted San Francisco's monthlong same-*** wedding march
>>>>>>>>>> > that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's direction.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-
>>>>>>>>>> >Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying
>>>>>>>>>except maybe the Crazies in the South who are going to be too
>>>>>>>>>busy sitting on their hands to vote for Gramps. They are more
>>>>>>>>>concerned about losing their house, losing their job,
>>>>>>>>>affortding a tank of gas and affording to go to the doctor
>>>>>>>>>right about now. Never mind thousands of their kids getting
>>>>>>>>>killed and more than half a trillion dollars of their money
>>>>>>>>>thrown away.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>S. Olson
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Uh, no.  Why do you ask?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes.  Your question was totally irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is California part
>>>>>>>> of the South?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Uh, no.  Why do you ask?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you read the post I was responding to?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes.  Your question was totally irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
>>>>>>>> marriages.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>62% of California voters were just told that they have no right to
>>>>>>>deny homo***uals the right to marry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
>>>>>
>>>>>The four conservative judges were appointed by Republican governors.
>>>>>Judicial activism is a term applied by the right-wing fringe to any
>>>>>judicial decision that it finds unappealing.  The ruling ensures
>>>>>that the law treats all Californians fairly and equally.  That is
>>>>>not judicial activism.  I have always found it puzzling why
>>>>>conservatives seem so hell-bent on denying fundamental rights to
>>>>>people. Throughout the years, conservatism has endorsed things like
>>>>>slavery, segregation, homophobia, and prayer in school.
>>>>>Conservatism has oppression as its core value.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Democrats were the slave owners bent on keeping their slaves.
>>>
>>>Yes.  Then, the decendants of those slave owners found a new home in
>>>the Republican Party during the execution of Nixon's "Southern
>>>Strategy."
>>
>> Thanks for confirming the Democratic party was the party of slave
>> owners and segregationists.
>
>Thanks for comfirming that the Republican Party IS NOW the party of slave

>owners and segregationists.
>
It's the Liberals that Secretary of State Condie Rice Aunt Jemima.
They are so racist.
-

I thank God I am not a liberal because I hate Kool Aid.