Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Republican > (rev 1.2) Russi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 202212 of 224698
Post > Topic >>

(rev 1.2) Russia's Medvedev's First Global Evil Act: "Sup****t China's Hu Jintao's Need For Stability Of Evil" - "Balance of Good and Evil" - {HRI note 20080524-V1.2} - encl. {HRI 20070207-V3.7-q1-V1.1}

by Koos Nolst Trenite <AmbassadorForMankind@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 25, 2008 at 01:07 PM

Russia's Medvedev's First Global Evil Act:

     "Sup****t China's Hu Jintao's Need For Stability Of Evil"

                                                         24 May 2008
                                             {HRI note 20080524-V1.2}


            An introductory joke, told in Russia:

            At a restaurant, Putin and Medvedev order from the menu,
            and Putin tells the waiter, "I will have steak."

            The waiter asks 'And what would you order for vegetables?'
            Putin orders: "The vegetable will also have steak."

'

Certainly, Hu Jintao will also have 'ordered steak' for his guest, for
 Russia's present head of state, Medvedev, while visiting Hu Jintao.
 (see introductory joke, above)

'

'

Not at all joking, now, but about a future of Cold War against Freedom
 that THE CRIMINAL MINDS - Hu Jintao and Putin - ARE BREWING with the
 help of their "friends in evil:"

                 (Criminal Minds have no friends, only "allies" who
                  sup****t evil)

 We could now have had a future of peace on earth - were it not for
 the sociopaths Putin and Hu Jintao - I wrote earlier while explaining
 to you their "Balance of Power" and their "People are all Equal".'

'

            Now, instead of quoting what I write, THE journalists

                  - rather than by reading Cicero or Plato, they must
                    have been brought up with Winnie The Pooh - (they)

            rather print the lies of Hu Jintao or of Putin or now of
            Putin's 'vegetable' (see joke, above) Medvedev,

                        or of Bin Laden, and of other Criminal Minds,
                        for that matter,

                  and they, THE journalists, do so, without ever
                  mentioning the actual intentions of these very
                  severely Criminal Minds or of the servants of these.

'

'

                        The same applies to THE journalists printing
                        now again the lies of the Burmese ('Myanmar')
                        dictators and those very repulsive lies from
                        the Secretary General of the United Nations
                        Organization,

                              the one who visited the five million
                              people disaster area, THREE WEEKS AFTER
                              the disaster took place,

                                   "because the Criminals did not
                                    allow it," so he claims to cover
                                    up his own Insanity, because

                                    Mr. Ban Ki-Moon could not think
                                    of any way to help a few million
                                    people,

                                          despite an endless supply
                                          of op****tunities and demands
                                          to do so, he did NOT,

                                    BECAUSE Ban Ki-Moon DOES NOT WANT
                                    TO HELP PEOPLE - obviously, very
                                    obviously,

                                    instead he ACTIVELY SUP****TS all
                                    the intentions and lies to PREVENT
                                    millions of people from being
                                    helped

                                          from being helped by those
                                          who are very intensely
                                          trying to deliver global
                                          help.

                                    The main intention of Ban Ki-Moon
                                    is

                                          intelligently to hide evil,
                                          by PRETENDING to care for
                                          people globally.

'

Neither Russia, nor China, have any valid vote - LET ALONE A 'VETO' -
 in any Security Council at all, as they have proven consistently in
 the past by their vicious DESTRUCTION OF ANY SECURITY, and added to
 that their extortion of decent countries "in return for being less
 evil."

      You just ignore their "vote" or their 'veto,' because THEY DO
      NOT WANT SECURITY,

            they want danger, war, not peace, terror, extortion and
            domination,

      and they are only held in check by the decent governments on
      Earth,

                  by the NATO, you might say to simplify the matter,

            which they are CONSTANTLY ATTACKING, in whatever way
            possible - because they are and they sup****t Criminals
            and Criminality.

'

'

            And THE journalists, especially those headed by the
            Associated Press' (AP's) chief, Tom Curley,

            are doing a fantastic job of keeping the society that
            Insane, to print the lies uttered by Criminal or Cowardly
            Heads of State,

                  quoting lies verbatim, without stating the
                  intentions behind those lies, they are simply
                  quoting INTENTIONAL, destructive lies,

                  quoting these "in order to do 'sane' re****ting,"

                        so they claim, like true Criminal Minds do
                        claim it too,

            while it is merely and very intensely DESTRUCTIVE
            re****ting.

'

                  I HAVE STILL SEEN NO JOURNALIST WRITE about how
                  the Criminals maintain a "Balance of Evil and Good",

                  and about how these even use the United Nations
                  Organization for that, (*) and

                              the AP's Edith Lederer is there
                              to assist them in relaying to you
                              the INTENTIONAL LIES, from Putin's
                              Ambassador, from Hu Jintao's Ambassador,
                              etc. etc., to the United Nations,

                              relaying lies and the hidden intentions
                              with it,

                        because "it is not sane, to talk about good
                        and evil,"

                             (especially not about the evil and the
                              good - should he have any - of the AP's
                              Tom Curley so one is inclined to assume)

                  BUT they provide endless "excuses" in their "Freedom
                  of Journalism,"

                        for "why they can not write the truth,"

                  why they are compelled to use the hard-won and
                  hard-fought-for freedom given to them, given to them
                  by those who were tortured and died for it,

                        for your having some freedom now; but that you
                        use now

                  NOT in order to free, but to destroy the society,

                        by refusing to call evil evil, and lies lies,

                  using all kind of fancy names instead, like
                  'reclusive,' and 'hard-line' and 'hawkish,' 'ethnic'
                  and 'violence' and 'anti-American,' etc. etc.:

                              'Who killed 50 people today?'
                               - "Violence did;" "Violence started
                                  again in the region;"

                              'Why were they killed?'
                               - "They were Ethnic minorities;"

                                    utterly Insane re****ting because
                                    it does not lead to a solution
                                    or remedy of the matter, and so
                                    it is

                        in direct opposition to their lofty and very
                        journalistic company charters.

                              INSTEAD of calling lies and intentions
                              to dominate and treacherous acts and
                              extortion, for what they are:

                        They claim "they can not know what is good or
                        evil," they are - by Tom Curley etc. - NOT
                        ALLOWED TO HAVE A CONSCIENCE,

                             'Beauty and Ugliness, Good and Evil,
                              "are just a matter of consideration,"
                              as the demons whisper in their ears,'
                              *(6)

                        they claim "they can not re****t the intentions
                        of Putin or of Medvedev or of Hu Jintao or
                        of Chavez or of (the almost late) Castro."

                        (see 'Introduction to Journalism Course')

'

_______________
I wrote earlier:

We Could Now Have Had A Future Of Peace On Earth - Were It Not For
 The Sociopaths Putin And Hu Jintao:

 Balance of Power - "Power of Evil to be kept equal to Power of Good"

                                                     7 February 2007
                                          {HRI 20070207-V3.7-q1-V1.1}

                                                  (quoted and edited *
                                                      on 22 Feb 2008)


'

The only thing THEY want, is to be freely as Criminal and for other
 Sociopaths to be freely as Criminal as they want to be, without being
 stopped,

      and this is why they oppose any actual Democracy and, with it,
      they oppose any legal security and security of expression and
      security of possession for others, *(5)

            and they attack MOST VIOLENTLY anyone who exposes and
            stops their Crimes - like Putin does right now "attack"
            law and freedom being established globally by the
            Democratic and free states of Earth,

                  countries that Putin describes with the utmost
                  Insanity, in his public speeches and in his
                  political and secret acts, as

                      "being enemies that threaten Russia."

                            In actual fact, he, Putin, is then talking
                            about HIMSELF - as the Russian opposition
                            parties are well aware.

'

Of course, destroying global peace

      - which, as I explained elsewhere, Putin and Hu Jintao do very
         actively destroy, both openly and secretly (via their
        'proxies' North Korea, Sudan, Iran, Mayanmar, Syria, etc.) -

      destroying global peace

 is not economical at all,

      except maybe seemingly so, for a short while and to a few people
      who are shown only the short term "benefits." *(1a)

'

            And of course a thief or a dictator does not want any
            security at all for people, certainly not globally.

'

                  The current (meaning, the 10 February 2007) public
                  Sociopathic "rant" of Putin, is entirely and only
                  aimed at driving people insane and at thus helping
                  other Sociopaths to stay in power.

                  This is also the only aim of his (in 2007) intended
                  "diplomatic" visits to the Middle East:

                  To drive people insane - to MAKE people Criminal,
                  to make people NOT OPPOSE Crime.

'

'

                        When they can not achieve that, they demand
                        a 'balance of power' - the next best
                        "defense position" of a Criminal Mind:

                             "People have to have the right to be
                              evil, and need places to freely be
                              evil, unchecked,"

                              or "sovereign" and "protected by
                              international law," *(5)

'

                                    which is, how THEY would like, or
                                    even demand, that others should

                                   "understand" the "rights they are
                                    allowed to insist on" as derived
                                    from "sovereignty," and from
                                    "international law,"

                                          which is not and never has
                                          been the purpose of those
                                          concept and laws: It is NOT

                              to create and maintain a regime of evil,
                              and that even,

                                    NOT merely to terrorize a part of
                                    a TOWN or of a PROVINCE, as common
                                    criminals like to accomplish it,
                                    but

                              as A WHOLE COUNTRY,

                        so that any Criminal can choose the side of
                        evil, and flee there from the wrath of those
                        the Criminal harmed

                             (to flee from prosecution, for instance,
                              for murder committed against a very
                              valuable and courageous person - let's
                              say, murder perpetrated by pouring
                              Polonium in the tea of the victim, and
                              the murderer seeking protection from a
                              Criminal government, even being offered
                              a seat in that country's parliament)

                        and to have a base, from which to inflict harm
                        - "on others:"

'

'

                              Suddenly, people who happen 'not to live
                              in the same country,' are supposed to
                              be "others."

                              And "it is OK to harm 'others'," because

                                    ah... well, ah, you see, ah...

                             "because they are 'others'," and "you
                              have to choose SOMEONE TO HARM, isn't
                              it, so, primarily you choose 'OTHERS',"

                                    rather than those of 'your own'
                                    group - at least openly, (whom)

                              to murder, or to steal from, and to lie
                              about.

'

                             "It is also much safer," within a country
                              of evil, when you brand the others,
                              like Israel, "to be enemies,"

                                    I don't see the Israelis having
                                    ever been evil to the Iranians,

                                    but on the other side, there are
                                    violent Criminals, who, with
                                    Khomeini, have been allowed to
                                    found a country of evil, called
                                    'the Islamic State of Iran,' and

                                    so they have to shout (some Arab
                                    custom it seems, it is, to shout)
                                    that "Israel" is "evil" and "must
                                    be wiped out,"

'

                                    indeed, for the Criminals to have
                                    some more 'breathing space,' or

                                   'Lebensraum' as they said in their
                                    previous life time, in which they
                                    were openly allowed and encouraged

                                    to feel contempt for and to lie
                                    about, and

                                    to freely destroy any Jewish
                                    person, and be 'abiding by law,'
                                    in doing so.

'

                                          Such is the nature also of
                                          Putin and Hu Jintao, the
                                          subjects of the present *
                                          Human Rights Issue

                                         (and what they say - together
                                          with their 'adviser,' Henry
                                          Kissinger, what they say -
                                          is):

                                         'There has to be a balance
                                          between powers' - "the bad
                                          cops and the good cops must
                                          be equally strong and be
                                          equally well equipped"

                                          - and 'that is only fair,'
                                            because "life is a game" -

                                          and (so they like you to
                                          see their utter Insanity and
                                          their malice)

                                         "A BALANCE OF POWER DOES
                                          PROTECT THE WEAK from being
                                          obliterated by either side."

'

                       "There has to be a balance between good and
                        evil" - is, what they mean very literally

                              but, they can, of course, not say that
                              exactly as they mean it.

                        What they mean, is:

                             "If we do NOT, at this time, manage to
                              dominate global organizations, then:"

                             "The United Nations Organization must be
                              a balanced representation of all
                              countries" - MEANING,

                             "It must represent a balance between good
                              and evil, and must be composed of and
                              must be controlled by good and by evil
                              people,"

                                   "as long as we can not manage to
                                    have it - the United Nations
                                    Organization - FULLY dominated by
                                    evil individuals (by dictators)."

'

For your convenience, I will again give the definition of Democracy.

      Democracy basically means

      seeing what people - all people, from local to global - need,

      and, what they need of course as a main thing, is, to be asked
      what life they want to live together, what they want to do
      together;

            and that means, even if asked locally, like for a town
            or for a country, still, what people there want for ALL
            people, from local to global;

      so it is asking, what people do like to spend their efforts and
      money on, and how they like to do so, and making it possible for
      them to do so,

      again, it means, asking ALL people,

            with solely the exception of severely Criminal Minds, who
            are cared for and not of course as they wish, but they can
            be asked how they wish to be restrained, and of course

            these have no right whatsoever, *(2a) to vote or otherwise
            to determine the activities of others.

      {definition of Democracy} **

'

Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet

                                            'Men of all nations came
                                       to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
                                  sent by all the kings of the world,
                                         who had heard of his wisdom.'

                                                        1 Kings 4:34



_________
Footnotes:

(*)   Quoted and edited from:

     'We Could Now Have Had A Future Of Peace On Earth - Were It Not
      For The Sociopaths Putin And Hu Jintao - 'Balance of Power' and
      'People are all Equal' '
      {HRI 20070207-V3.7}
       (7 February 2007 - Version 3.7 on 21 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/1a4d7ac9a9f14036
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/274fd668a98e5f53
      {HRI 20070207-V3.7-t} (Version 3.7-t on 21 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/us.military.army/msg/a2e60873eedaa3af

'

(**)  See under (5)

(1a)  'Definition of Peace' (DOP)
      {HRI 20070520-V3.2}
       (20 May 2007 - Version 3.2 on 17 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.martial-arts/msg/b13e925be4fa484b

(2a) 'The Rights of Criminal Minds' (RCM)
      {HRI 20040108-V1.2.1}
       (8 January 2004 - Version 1.2.1 on 9 Aug 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/93359b640af83e20


(5)  'China NOT A VALID MEMBER of the United Nations Organization (UN,
      UNO, ONU)'
      {HRI 20060429-V3.4.1} - it quotes from {HRI 20060427-V1.1}
       (29 April 2006 - Version 3.4.1 on 19 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/77bd6502b44bbcd7
'

_________________________________________
Additional Footnote to {HRI note 20080524}:

(6)  'Else YOU would have written: 'What is the difference between
      a good Scientologist and a good Nazi?'
       (24 May 2008 - Version 1.2)
http://groups.google.com/group/be.politics/msg/b5b22690e020e3ad
'

__________
References:

     ' "Balance of Power" IS a Criminally Insane "re****ting" term'
      {HRI 20060111}
       (11 January 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.journalism/msg/66e128ad164dad2a

     'Definition of Peace' (DOP)
      {HRI 20070520-V3.2}
       (20 May 2007 - Version 3.2 on 17 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.martial-arts/msg/b13e925be4fa484b
'

____________
Verification:

            http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2008 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
 and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
 anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
 who p***** it on unaltered, and with this message included,
 to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to sup****t any political
 or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
 encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
 about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
 PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
(rev 1.2) Russia's Medvedev's First Global Evil Act: "Support Ch
Koos Nolst Trenite <Am  2008-05-25 13:07:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 18:43:46 CST 2008.