http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=115519
Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States
Posted By: ChristopherBollyn <Send E-Mail>
Date: Thursday, 20 December 2007, 1:18 p.m.
Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand
That Rules Britain and the United States
By Christopher Bollyn
For all practical purposes, the United States and Britain are
Zionist-occupied nations. Because the American and British people are
generally ignorant of what Zionism is, the meaning of this statement is
not
widely understood or appreciated.
The lack of understanding by the public, however, doesn't change
the
fact that these once great nations have become Zionist-controlled states.
The
evidence is clearly seen in the self-destructive foreign policies these
nations have pursued for the past 40 years or so.
The Anglo-American "leader****p" positions in the illegal invasion
and
occupation of Iraq and their sup****t of the costly Zionist fraud known as
the
"War on Terror" is further proof that Zionists control these nations as
if
any were needed.
How did these powerful and independent nations become Zionist
controlled? Unlike Palestine, where Eastern European Zionist immigrants
used
brutal terrorism to ethnically "cleanse" and conquer the land, in Britain
and
the United States the Zionists gained power gradually through "dumbing
down"
and effectively disenfranchising the native populations.
In Britain and the United States, the Zionists saved the use of
terrorism for later, after they already controlled the media and the
levers of
power and government.
Americans today still believe they are free because the media
tells
them so and because they don't see the restraints and are able to move
around
and buy things. Americans are, indeed, free to work and shop, but they
have
virtually no real political power whatsoever. A good example is that while
an
overwhelming majority of the U.S. population is against the war in Iraq,
the
war and the huge spending bills to sup****t it go on unchallenged by their
representatives in Congress. Why don't the Congressmen vote to stop the
disastrous war that has consumed hundreds of billions of dollars and taken
more than 3,000 American lives?
Most Americans in the "land of the free and the home of the brave"
are
completely unaware that they have lost the most cherished democratic
franchise, i.e. the citizen's fundamental right to vote and count their
votes.
They think their vote counts and don't have a clue that they lost their
democratic franchise years ago. They are unaware of this situation simply
because the media has not told them.
"If the media doesn't talk about, it must not be a problem" is the
American way of thinking.
For the Zionist-controlled media, the absence of any citizen
oversight
of the vote-counting process and complete lack of transparency in American
elections are simply non-issues, just like many other very im****tant
subjects
of vital im****tance to the survival of the republic.
As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly
enslaved
than those who falsely believe they are free." This aptly describes the
difficult condition Americans face at the beginning of the 21st Century.
Zionists, a marginal minority of Polish and Russian Jewish
immigrants,
were able to gain control of these great English-speaking nations by
obtaining
control of two fundamental institutions: the media and academia. This is
not
to say that they don't control other key institutions, but these two are
of
essential im****tance because they largely define the intellectual life of
a
nation.
Having worked in the media and studied Middle East history at an
American university, I know what I am talking about here. History of the
Middle East and Europe, and virtually every other subject taught at
American
universities, is viewed only through the Zionist prism.
For example, when I studied the Middle East at the University of
California at Santa Cruz, the head of the department was a professor named
Edmund Burke who had studied under the famous British Jew, Bernard Lewis,
at
Princeton. Burke was always recommending the books of Bernard Lewis, which
I
avoided like the plague.
Bernard Lewis
American historian Joel Beinin called Lewis "perhaps the most
articulate and learned Zionist advocate in the North American Middle East
academic community."
"Terry" Burke spent 1990 "on sabbatical" with Lewis at Princeton.
He
returned to Santa Cruz in the late summer, just before the U.S. invasion
of
Iraq in January 1991. I remember Burke giving a speech in August or
September
at the federal building in Santa Cruz as the conflict was heating up. The
very
first words out of his mouth were "Balkanization," something that amazes
me to
this day. He was unwilling to explain his choice of words when I called
him
about a year ago.
Edmund "Terry" Burke of UCSC
Although my main interest was Israel and Palestine, Burke
recommended
that I read a book about Yugoslavia. Balkanization, the breaking up of
nations
into ethnic statelets, is the Zionist plan for the entire Middle East,
articulated by Oded Yinon of the Israeli foreign ministry in the early
1980s.
During the many lectures and courses I studied on the Middle East,
never did I hear a critical word about Zionism or its brutal history in
Eastern Europe and Palestine. This is primarily because the professors of
Middle Eastern studies and European history are usually Jewish and
strongly
inclined to sup****t Zionism.
If a professor were to openly criticize Zionism as the racist and
violent ideology that it is, he would probably find himself unemployed in
very
short order.
I understood this and endeavored to present the anti-Zionist
perspective at the university. I brought speakers like Ralph Schoenman,
the
author of The Hidden History of Zionism (1988), to the campus and led a
tour
of photojournalists to the West Bank and Gaza Strip shortly after the
invasion
of Iraq. Despite a great deal of effort and years of experience in the
region,
Burke did not give me "honors" with my degree, most likely because of my
anti-Zionist views.
The media in the United States is controlled in the same way as
the
universities. The editors and journalists are prevented from investigating
and
discussing the real history of Zionism because the news outlets are
usually
owned by people who are themselves dedicated Zionists. The takeover of CNN
by
Gerald M. Levin of AOL Time Warner marked the fall of the last major
non-Zionist media network.
Gerald Levin
Today, all major news outlets in the United States and Britain are
strongly Zionist. There were a few good newspapers, such as the Christian
Science Monitor, that provided some balance to the pro-Zionist
"mainstream"
networks, but even they have now fallen.
The result is that the populations of the United States, Britain,
and
Australia are largely ignorant of Zionism and what it has done in the past
in
other countries -- and what it is doing now -- in theirs.
NON-ISSUES
Selecting issues and non-issues for coverage is the primary method
employed by the Zionist-controlled news networks. Issues get a lot of
coverage
while non-issues get none.
Here are a few examples of issues and non-issues in the
Zionist-controlled media:
Iran's legal and monitored efforts to develop nuclear energy are
an
issue; Israel's illegal and secret nuclear arsenal is not.
Discussion of the alleged role of Muslims in terrorist acts is
an
issue; solid evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the London
bombings
is not.
The two-year long fake presidential campaign with a host of
Zionist-controlled candidates is an issue; how our electronic "votes" are
counted by mysterious "private" foreign companies of unknown owner****p is
not.
I don't know if any other American journalist and 9-11 researcher
has
been attacked, TASERed, and had their elbow broken by an undercover
tactical
squad in front of their family in the United States, but I know that when
it
happened to me in August 2006 it was very much a non-issue with the
controlled
media.
WHO ARE THESE FOREIGN MINISTERS?
The position of foreign minister, or secretary of state in the
United
States, is a very im****tant position, second only to the president or
prime
minister. Since foreign policy is the only policy coming out of Wa****ngton
or
London these days, these positions are of crucial im****tance and speak
volumes
about who is really controlling the government.
In the United States and Britain we have very strange people with
odd
backgrounds in these high-level appointed positions. The current British
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs is a 42-year-old
politician named David Wright Miliband, the son of the Belgian-born
Marxist,
Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband.
David Milliband
The U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a 53-year-old former
professor, holds the comparable position in the American government.
What is most peculiar -- and telling -- is that the backgrounds,
loyalties, and ideologies of these two high-level appointed officials are
never discussed in the Zionist-controlled media; clearly this is a
non-issue.
WHO IS DAVID MILIBAND?
It goes without saying that both Miliband and Rice are dedicated
Zionists, they are, after all, serving in extremely pro-Zionist
governments.
But why are their personal and family histories not discussed by the
media?
Don't the American and British people have a right to know the person who
is
overseeing the implementation of their national foreign policy?
David Miliband, who only became a Member of Parliament in June
2001,
was recently in Basra, Iraq, when the British officially stepped back from
their failure and turned over control to Iraqi authorities.
Although Miliband and other British officials have tried to put a
good
face on the disastrous results of the Anglo-American invasion and
occupation,
the fact that it has been a complete failure is painfully apparent to all.
As a senior Iraqi military officer told ABC News, "The British
legacy
in Basra is criminal gangs, a corrupt and infiltrated police force, and
borders open to all."
Major-General Jalil Khalaf, the new police commander in Basra,
told
the Times of London: "They left me militia, they left me gangsters, and
they
left me all the troubles in the world."
Yousif Nassar, one of Basras most famous composers, is also
disappointed at what the British did to his city. "The British Forces
created
chaos and failed to deliver what they promised," he said, as re****ted by
the
Times of December 17, 2007.
The Times article was entitled "Crumbling services and violence on
the
streets, but hope follows British pullout."
"We congratulate all of those who have helped achieve this, most
notably British and Coalition military and civilian personnel," Defense
Secretary Des Browne and David Miliband said in a joint statement when the
pullout was announced. How could these senior British officials
congratulate
anyone for their achievments in Basra? The Anglo-American occupation of
Iraq
is nothing but an unmitigated disaster. Perhaps that was the plan all
along?
Knowing who David Miliband is and what he represents is key to
understanding the real power behind Britain's foreign policy. This is
certainly the reason the Zionist-controlled media keeps the British
population
and the world ignorant of the Miliband family's roots in Brussels.
David Milliband
David Miliband is the son of Ralph Miliband, born Adolphe in
Brussels
in 1924, and Marion Kozak. Ralph was a well known Marxist political
theorist.
Ralph, who died in 1994, is buried in Highgate Cemetery close to his idol,
Karl Marx.
Miliband and his father, the Marxist Ralph Milliband at his
spacious
home in a comfortable part of London
David's brother, Edward Samuel Miliband, is also a member of Prime
Minister Gordon Brown's cabinet where he has been chairman of the
Treasury's
Council of Economic Advisers, which directs the UK's long-term economic
planning.
Beyond that, the family history gets confusing and misleading, on
purpose I'm sure.
The online biography of Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband says he was born
in
Brussels of Polish-Jewish emigr้ parents and that both his parents lived
in
the Jewish quarter of Warsaw, before his father, Samuel "Sam" Miliband,
joined
the Red Army in the Polish-Soviet or Bolshevik War (February 1919 March
1921).
Sam Miliband is said to have left Poland after the First World
War,
which ended in November 1918. He supposedly became a leather worker in
Belgium
and then returned to Poland to join the Red Army under the command of Leon
Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) in 1920.
The commanders who served under Trotsky in the Bolshevik War
against
Poland were Mikhail Tukhachevsky, Aleksandr Yegorov, Joseph Stalin, and
Felix
Dzerzhinsky.
Nikolay Bukharin, writing in the Soviet newspaper Pravda, urged
the
Bolsheviks to carry on beyond Warsaw "right up to London and Paris."
General's Tukhachevsky's order of July 2, 1920 read:
To the West! Over the corpse of White Poland lies the road to
world-wide conflagration. March on Vilno, Minsk, Warsaw! Onward to Berlin
over
the corpse of Poland!
Why would a poor leather worker in Belgium give up his work and
travel
all the way to Poland to fight with the Bolshevik Red Army against the
Polish
Republic and the West? If this is true, Samuel Miliband must have been a
very
dedicated communist.
This is, however, most certainly not the whole truth. The family
tree
of the family of David and Edward Miliband clearly indicates that their
grandfather Samuel Miliband was also born, like their father Adolphe, in
Brussels in 1865. In this case, Brussels-born Sam must have been an
extremely
dedicated communist. There is another possible explanation. Perhaps Sam
was a
Zionist emissary on a mission to bring sup****t and funds to the Red Army
in
their attempt to conquer Poland. If the family tree is correct that Sam
Miliband was born in Brussels, there is something more to the Miliband
story.
The Miliband family tree provides the names and dates of birth of
Samuel's 11 siblings, his parents, and even his grand-parents, data which
sup****ts it as a credible source. Why then has the Zionist-controlled
media
obscured the Miliband family history and pretended that David's father was
born in Warsaw, when his family records indicate he was born in Brussels?
This is information about the Miliband family that the
Zionist-controlled media had evidently decided that the public does not
need
to know. It also suggests that the preferential treatment and promotions
that
the Milibands have received since coming to Britain have more to do with
their
high-level connections than with their abilities.
Their connections and loyalties are evidently to the highest
levels of
the Zionist "Communist" International in Brussels, which is the only
reason
they are in the positions they are in. Their loyalty is clearly not to the
British nation or people.
WHO IS JOSEF KORBEL?
The same is true of Condoleezza Rice, who was mentored at the
University of Denver by the Czechoslovakian Jewish immigrant, Josef
Korbel,
the father of the previous secretary of state, Marie Jana Korbelova,
a.k.a.
Madeleine Albright.
Marie Jana Korbelova with her father, Josef Korbel - 1943
One might think that this amazing coincidence would be newsworthy
but
it has generally been ignored by the controlled media as well. This is
probably because the obvious question, "Who is Josef Korbel?" is a
question
the Zionist-controlled media does not want to address.
Josef Korbel (1909-77) was a Czechoslovakian diplomat in the
London-based "government" in exile of Edvard Benes, which took power in
Prague
after World War II. Korbel was the father of Bill Clinton's Secretary of
State, Madeleine Albright, and the mentor of George W. Bush's Secretary of
State, Condoleezza Rice. What a coincidence or is it?
Condoleezza Rice and Zippy Livni, the Israeli foreign minister.
Livni is the daughter of the former head of operations of the
Irgun, a
Zionist terror organization.
Korbel was also a thief. Korbel stole paintings which belonged to
German industrialist Karl Nebrich, whose property in Prague was
confiscated as
part of the post-war Benes decrees. Like the more than three million other
ethnic Germans from Bohemia, Moravia, and Slovakia, Nebrich and his family
were expelled from the country under the postwar decrees, which oddly
remain
in force to this day.
Would any European nation that banned Jews and confiscated their
property be allowed to be a member of the European Union? Why are such
racist
laws permitted against Germans?
Korbel's stealing of property and art is just the tip of the
iceberg.
Korbel was involved in the United Nations partition of India and Pakistan
and
the illegal arming of the Zionist fighters in Palestine until the end of
1948.
When the communists came to power in 1948, Korbel was charged and
sentenced and fled to New York where he lived in the cottage house of a
very
large mansion in Great Neck, New York. He was eventually given a teaching
position at the University of Denver.
The Korbel's move to New York is described in Seasons of Her Life,
A
Biography of Madeleine Albright:
The Korbels settled into a home just outside New York City.
One of
Joseph Korbel's colleagues at the United Nations had helped the family
rent a
small gardener's cottage at 149 Station Road in a woodsy section of Great
Neck, a prosperous and developing suburban community on Long Island's
North
Shore.
Korbel clearly played a key role in the Zionist-Israeli weapons
pipeline from Czechoslovakia, which was the main supplier and base for the
nascent Israeli Air Force. The Zionist air bridge from Czechoslovakia,
known
as Operation Balak, was the essential weapons supply line and is regarded
as
one of the Israeli Air Force's most im****tant achievements. Czechoslovakia
provided weapons, ammunition, and the first fighter airplanes to the
Zionist
forces in Palestine.
The would-be Israelis even operated their own airbase and pilot
training school in Czechoslovakia. Yugoslavia played an im****tant role as
the
main transit point for arms ****pments going by sea and a refueling stop
for
the Israeli and Zionist pilots flying fighter aircraft from Czechoslovakia
to
Palestine which became the State of Israel after May 1948.
Korbel, an avowed anti-communist and senior member of the Benes
government, became the Czech ambassador to Belgrade at this time, although
he
hated the socialism of Tito. Korbel was the ambassador in Yugoslavia
because
he was playing another more im****tant role: the key Zionist point man in
the
illegal weapons transfers to Jewish forces in Palestine. The people, such
as
****mon Peres, who were involved in the illegal weapons smuggling to the
Haganah and the Irgun terrorist gangs in Palestine have been at the top of
the
Zionist hierarchy since 1948.
There is, of course, much more to the sordid Milliband, Korbel,
and
Rice histories. This material is provided simply to illustrate the
high-level
Zionist connections of the people who shaped and taught the current
foreign
ministers of Britain and the United States. Because this information is
not
provided by the controlled media in these two great nations, I am
providing
this research to help my fellow Americans and British friends realize who
is
controlling their foreign policy which is nothing short of disastrous.
|
