Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Satanism in Politics > Re: Satanists S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 195 Topic 269 of 342
Post > Topic >>

Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!

by "Tani Jantsang ©" <tjsrno@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 18, 2007 at 04:07 AM

"user" <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:139pmk03j9cdc66@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tani Jantsang © wrote:
>
>>
>> "user" <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:139o5cgtb0bi5fd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > the 2nd coming of christ wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:23:38 -0000, "user" <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >How serious he is on
>> >> >this point is shown by his attitude on LSD. 'Like opium,
>> marijuana, >> >heroin and so forth, it ought to be shunned like the
>> plague' >>
>> >> only a retard would put marijuana and heroin in the same category.
>> >
>> > Only a retard would use illegal drugs.
>> >
>> > Give me a J!  Give me an A!  Give me an I!  Give me an L!
>> >
>> > What does that spell?!!!
>> >
>> > JAIL!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> That is not the reason that LaVey was so strongly against drugs.  He
>> explains why clearly in the Satanic Bible.  It's his org, his rules.
>> Period.
>>
>> I happen to know that there are some people in the CoS that DO use
>> drugs, heavy drugs - and even sell drugs, heavy drugs (not pot).
>> Galen is one of them.  He joined the CoS not even realizing that the
>> LaVeyans don't believe in magic.
>
> With respect, where is the proof behind these accusations you make?
> Unless you can give any evidence then your claims are merely hearsay
> and gossip.

I just gave you a first name.  Like, he admits it himself - admitted it 
quite a long time ago.  No secret.  If Gilmore and Nadramia found out, 
they'd probably kick him out.  Not the point.  He should have read the SB 
before joining the CoS and then doing what he was doing.  It's heh, how he

got all the MONEY he has - and yeah, it's pretty well known and he
admitted 
it.
>
> Are you asking me to BELIEVE you?  If so then I live by the philosophy
> of DOUBT and doubt what you are saying is true.

Is that like the mother who doubts that her son is "gay or something" when

he dresses up in her clothing and always invites the mailman in for
private 
parties?  heh.
>
> I have read your posts for a couple years and think that you have a
> personal anti-CoS agenda because you are a disgruntled ex-member.

I never was a MEMBER of the CoS. Get that straight.  I don't like the
people 
in the CoS - and for good reasons.  However, I DO like ****va-girl - and 
she's CoS.  I like Morena, and she's CoS.  So it's not 100%.  I was never
a 
member of ANY Satanic organization out there - but I was given high titles

by every single one of them at one time or another - and I never used
them. 
I helped to found an org of our own.  I don't join things, and I certainly

do not PAY MONEY for things, that are actually nothing.  Yes, I agree with

LaVey about how suckers are born everyday.  LaVey also never JOINED an 
organization.  HA!!
>
> All you do is complain about the CoS and waste your time trying to
> "expose" them or whatnot.  Do you not have better things to do with
> your time?  Move on and get a life and get over yourself.

I don't do that unless one of their people BOTHERS me.  In which case,
there 
are nicely written files to counter all the utter rubbish they might try
to 
spew my way.  In the way they carry on, they are NO different from 
fundamentalist christians.
>
> If the CoS is SO stupid and insignificant to you then why waste your
> time trying to throw poo at them?

You are accusing me of throwing poo on them when I clarified what LaVey
felt 
about drugs.  I didn't throw poo or anything else on him.  It's his org,
his 
rules.  Period.  That is what I said.  You are acting like an overly 
defensive little spaniel.  Get over it.

I suggest putting your focus on
> something else more productive because you have done enough damage to
> yourself and can't change the past.

I have never done damage to myself.  My dealings with the CoS did nothing 
but MAKE ME MONEY and I got exactly what I wanted from them.  In return, 
they got articles from me. That's what they asked for.  They published
them 
all.  They did NOT appreciate it when I told them to **** off, or when I 
told them that they had no exclusive rights to OUR stuff, or any of the 
other things that actually did happen - which can be proven by what is 
PUBLISHED IN THEIR OWN MAGAZINES OVER A DECADE.  I got what I wanted. 
They 
ran my ad, gave me things, tapes, videos, favors.  I have no problem with 
that.  I didn't deal with their members.  I dealt with 4 people: Pete,
Peg, 
Anton, Blanche.  That's it.  No problem.  When I ran into their members, I

came to detest them.  End of story.  The REAL story - again, proven by 
what's published material.
>
> If it makes you feel better write your own Devil's Bible and focus on
> your own Devil's church.  If you can do it better then DO IT.  Move on
> and stop being a victim.  That is what you look like to everyone.

I have never been a victim.  You believe propaganda or you like to just 
invent it?  I have no interest in any devils or churches.  I never had any

interest in that kind of stupid irrelevant ****.
>
> Speaking to all whiny **** pseudo-Satanic groups in general, I grow
> tired of these groups that spend time attacking Dr. LaVey's Church of
> Satan and then hypocritically reference or carry The Satanic Bible in
> their right hand.  If you hate Anton Szandor LaVey and his church then
> why use his bible as a reference?

The SR used NOT ONE THING of LaVey's.  In fact, our stuff was always very 
different from anything of LaVey or the CoS. They liked it, published so 
much of it.  So what?  That doesn't mean I liked THEIR stuff.  It only
means 
that they liked MY stuff.  They are the ones that bothered to publish it. 
Asked for it.  Kept asking for more of it.  You have it all upside down, 
dear.
>
> Dee-dee-dee!  *drool goes dripping out of corner of mouf*
>
> No wonder you are not a member because Dr. LaVey hated whiners and
> complainers and house masochists.  You are most defiantly a house
> masochist.  What would happen if they let you back in?  I bet you would
> **** all over the carpet and throw yourself out again.

I never was a member.  One of things I dislike about their members is that

they are STUPID.  Like you.  REALLY stupid.

>
> Now get a box of tissues and wipe off those tears from under your eyes
> and do something productive with your life.  BUT -- I doubt you will
> change or can.  You are what you are -- a victim.

You are the one suckered out of 200 bucks, buster.  Not me.  Repeat:  they

gave me stuff.  You sound like a little kid on a nyaa nyaa rampage here. 
I 
didn't even say anything BAD about LaVey.  But here you go, jumping all up

and down, stomping your feet, POUTING, and acting like a little drone. 
Get 
a ****ing LIFE, you stupid loser.
>
> Everyone is innocent until proven guilty and that goes for Galen (not
> that I know who you are speaking about) who you tried to character
> assassinate.

He said it himself.  There are others.  That Pete and Peg don't bother to 
SHARE what they know with you is ha ha - FUNNY.
>
> How can I trust you if you have no evidence to sup****t your claims?
> How can I trust you if you say a member is using drugs and have no
> evidence to sup****t your claim.  If I were Galen I would sue you for
> defamation of character if I knew you was making posts like this.

I might post his logs, if I bothered to go dig them up.  HA!!
>
> I take everything with a grain of salt and that includes your anti-CoS
> propaganda.

I said nothing anti COS.  I corrected what YOU said about why LaVey was
anti 
drugs.
>
> Furthermore, if there are CoS members using drugs then I agree that bla 
> bla
> they SHOULD be re****ted bla bla bla to the authorities and it should be 
> brought to
> the yap yap yap CoS's attention.
>
> In my opinion, oxymoron there - if there are some members who are using 
> drugs under the
> CoS's nose then they will eventually be blah yap yap caught and 
> incarcerated.  They
> will eventually stratify code word, no-mind droning, yap yap themselves.
>
> I am sure the CoS would then disavow themselves from these types of
> cretins and excommunicate like Catholics them as they should.
>
 




 195 Posts in Topic:
Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-15 01:23:38 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-15 14:27:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 01:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:04:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 21:21:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 23:08:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-18 22:07:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 00:11:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 13:49:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:02:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:22:20 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 02:15:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 05:08:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 16:13:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:12:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:52:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:50:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 16:06:58 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 12:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-21 15:31:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 18:58:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-23 20:00:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-23 22:03:23 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-24 05:06:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-24 10:52:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 16:26:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 18:09:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 18:31:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 19:04:07 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 23:22:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 04:21:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-28 12:07:19 
CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Satani
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 16:33:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"LarbGai" <l  2007-07-28 16:38:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 17:35:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-28 12:51:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-28 18:13:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:37:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:40:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:35:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-28 22:54:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 22:19:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:41:44 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 14:27:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 12:10:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:01:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:37:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:15:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:07:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 11:07:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:38:16 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 20:02:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:09:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 05:52:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 16:04:48 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 19:07:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 05:30:10 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:49:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 14:21:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:26:18 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 17:13:21 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:21:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:32:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:41:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:50:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:38:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:40:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:53:20 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 16:59:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:05:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:29:35 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:05:36 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:20:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:13:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:06:24 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:00:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:39:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:50:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 17:00:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:08:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 13:16:29 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 03:55:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:22:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:26:28 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:09:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:02:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 19:54:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:44:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:12:15 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:03:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-05 20:10:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:31:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:08:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:24:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:32:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:24:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:04:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:35:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-28 17:01:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:28:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-29 10:23:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:04:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 07:40:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 14:18:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-30 19:20:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 22:25:11 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 04:02:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:40:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 18:52:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:23:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 22:08:45 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:08:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:55:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:47:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:58:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-08-02 22:40:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 06:39:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 03:25:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 04:42:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:34:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:56:24 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:57:54 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:57:04 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:58:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-06 09:53:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 11:04:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-13 02:05:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-13 05:10:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:44:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-13 20:14:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:55:21 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-17 08:59:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:33:29 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:13:31 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:12:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:20:50 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:33:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:32:44 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:38:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:38:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:42:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-18 22:53:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-20 07:02:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-21 23:06:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-22 08:00:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-23 10:55:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Vlad Bam <seanbam@[EMA  2007-08-03 16:32:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-20 05:41:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 05:48:49 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:24:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 16:57:27 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:16:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 08:47:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 12:39:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
georgesx254@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 16:58:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:27:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:43:48 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 17:53:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:44:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 17:07:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:13:52 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:14:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 20:37:00 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:42:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:10 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 00:19:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 04:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:32:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
George <georgesx254@[E  2007-07-19 16:46:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:59:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-21 14:55:33 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Kori Houghton <korihou  2007-07-19 18:11:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 20:25:18 CDT 2008.