Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Satanism in Politics > Re: Satanists S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 195 Topic 269 of 337
Post > Topic >>

Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!

by "user" <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 18, 2007 at 10:07 PM

Tani Jantsang © wrote:

> 
> "user" <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:139pmk03j9cdc66@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Tani Jantsang © wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "user" <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:139o5cgtb0bi5fd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > the 2nd coming of christ wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:23:38 -0000, "user" <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:  >> >>
> >> >> >How serious he is on
> >> >> >this point is shown by his attitude on LSD. 'Like opium,
> >> marijuana, >> >heroin and so forth, it ought to be shunned like the
> >> plague' >>
> >> >> only a retard would put marijuana and heroin in the same
> category.  >> >
> >> > Only a retard would use illegal drugs.
> >> >
> >> > Give me a J!  Give me an A!  Give me an I!  Give me an L!
> >> >
> >> > What does that spell?!!!
> >> >
> >> > JAIL!!!!!!!!!
> >>
> >> That is not the reason that LaVey was so strongly against drugs.
> He >> explains why clearly in the Satanic Bible.  It's his org, his
> rules.  >> Period.
> >>
> >> I happen to know that there are some people in the CoS that DO use
> >> drugs, heavy drugs - and even sell drugs, heavy drugs (not pot).
> >> Galen is one of them.  He joined the CoS not even realizing that
> the >> LaVeyans don't believe in magic.
> >
> > With respect, where is the proof behind these accusations you make?
> > Unless you can give any evidence then your claims are merely hearsay
> > and gossip.
> 
> I just gave you a first name.  Like, he admits it himself - admitted
> it quite a long time ago.  No secret.  If Gilmore and Nadramia found
> out, they'd probably kick him out.  Not the point.  He should have
> read the SB before joining the CoS and then doing what he was doing.
> It's heh, how he got all the MONEY he has - and yeah, it's pretty
> well known and he admitted it.
> >
> > Are you asking me to BELIEVE you?  If so then I live by the
> > philosophy of DOUBT and doubt what you are saying is true.
> 
> Is that like the mother who doubts that her son is "gay or something"
> when he dresses up in her clothing and always invites the mailman in
> for private parties?  heh.
> >
> > I have read your posts for a couple years and think that you have a
> > personal anti-CoS agenda because you are a disgruntled ex-member.
> 
> I never was a MEMBER of the CoS. Get that straight.  I don't like the
> people in the CoS - and for good reasons.  However, I DO like
> ****va-girl - and she's CoS.  I like Morena, and she's CoS.  So it's
> not 100%.  I was never a member of ANY Satanic organization out there
> - but I was given high titles by every single one of them at one time
> or another - and I never used them.  I helped to found an org of our
> own.  I don't join things, and I certainly do not PAY MONEY for
> things, that are actually nothing.  Yes, I agree with LaVey about how
> suckers are born everyday.  LaVey also never JOINED an organization.
> HA!!  >
> > All you do is complain about the CoS and waste your time trying to
> > "expose" them or whatnot.  Do you not have better things to do with
> > your time?  Move on and get a life and get over yourself.
> 
> I don't do that unless one of their people BOTHERS me.  In which
> case, there are nicely written files to counter all the utter rubbish
> they might try to spew my way.  In the way they carry on, they are NO
> different from fundamentalist christians.
> >
> > If the CoS is SO stupid and insignificant to you then why waste your
> > time trying to throw poo at them?
> 
> You are accusing me of throwing poo on them when I clarified what
> LaVey felt about drugs.  I didn't throw poo or anything else on him.
> It's his org, his rules.  Period.  That is what I said.  You are
> acting like an overly defensive little spaniel.  Get over it.
> 
> I suggest putting your focus on
> > something else more productive because you have done enough damage
> > to yourself and can't change the past.
> 
> I have never done damage to myself.  My dealings with the CoS did
> nothing but MAKE ME MONEY and I got exactly what I wanted from them.
> In return, they got articles from me. That's what they asked for.
> They published them all.  They did NOT appreciate it when I told them
> to **** off, or when I told them that they had no exclusive rights to
> OUR stuff, or any of the other things that actually did happen -
> which can be proven by what is PUBLISHED IN THEIR OWN MAGAZINES OVER
> A DECADE.  I got what I wanted.  They ran my ad, gave me things,
> tapes, videos, favors.  I have no problem with that.  I didn't deal
> with their members.  I dealt with 4 people: Pete, Peg, Anton,
> Blanche.  That's it.  No problem.  When I ran into their members, I
> came to detest them.  End of story.  The REAL story - again, proven
> by what's published material.  >
> > If it makes you feel better write your own Devil's Bible and focus
> > on your own Devil's church.  If you can do it better then DO IT.
> > Move on and stop being a victim.  That is what you look like to
> > everyone.
> 
> I have never been a victim.  You believe propaganda or you like to
> just invent it?  I have no interest in any devils or churches.  I
> never had any interest in that kind of stupid irrelevant ****.
> >
> > Speaking to all whiny **** pseudo-Satanic groups in general, I grow
> > tired of these groups that spend time attacking Dr. LaVey's Church
> > of Satan and then hypocritically reference or carry The Satanic
> > Bible in their right hand.  If you hate Anton Szandor LaVey and his
> > church then why use his bible as a reference?
> 
> The SR used NOT ONE THING of LaVey's.  In fact, our stuff was always
> very different from anything of LaVey or the CoS. They liked it,
> published so much of it.  So what?  That doesn't mean I liked THEIR
> stuff.  It only means that they liked MY stuff.  They are the ones
> that bothered to publish it.  Asked for it.  Kept asking for more of
> it.  You have it all upside down, dear.
> >
> > Dee-dee-dee!  *drool goes dripping out of corner of mouf*
> >
> > No wonder you are not a member because Dr. LaVey hated whiners and
> > complainers and house masochists.  You are most defiantly a house
> > masochist.  What would happen if they let you back in?  I bet you
> > would **** all over the carpet and throw yourself out again.
> 
> I never was a member.  One of things I dislike about their members is
> that they are STUPID.  Like you.  REALLY stupid.
> 
> >
> > Now get a box of tissues and wipe off those tears from under your
> > eyes and do something productive with your life.  BUT -- I doubt
> > you will change or can.  You are what you are -- a victim.
> 
> You are the one suckered out of 200 bucks, buster.  Not me.  Repeat:
> they gave me stuff.  You sound like a little kid on a nyaa nyaa
> rampage here.  I didn't even say anything BAD about LaVey.  But here
> you go, jumping all up and down, stomping your feet, POUTING, and
> acting like a little drone.  Get a ****ing LIFE, you stupid loser.
> >
> > Everyone is innocent until proven guilty and that goes for Galen
> > (not that I know who you are speaking about) who you tried to
> > character assassinate.
> 
> He said it himself.  There are others.  That Pete and Peg don't
> bother to SHARE what they know with you is ha ha - FUNNY.
> >
> > How can I trust you if you have no evidence to sup****t your claims?
> > How can I trust you if you say a member is using drugs and have no
> > evidence to sup****t your claim.  If I were Galen I would sue you for
> > defamation of character if I knew you was making posts like this.
> 
> I might post his logs, if I bothered to go dig them up.  HA!!
> >
> > I take everything with a grain of salt and that includes your
> > anti-CoS propaganda.
> 
> I said nothing anti COS.  I corrected what YOU said about why LaVey
> was anti drugs.
> >
> > Furthermore, if there are CoS members using drugs then I agree that
> > bla bla
> > they SHOULD be re****ted bla bla bla to the authorities and it
> > should be brought to
> > the yap yap yap CoS's attention.
> >
> > In my opinion, oxymoron there - if there are some members who are
> > using drugs under the
> > CoS's nose then they will eventually be blah yap yap caught and 
> > incarcerated.  They
> > will eventually stratify code word, no-mind droning, yap yap
> > themselves.
> >
> > I am sure the CoS would then disavow themselves from these types of
> > cretins and excommunicate like Catholics them as they should.
> > 

I admit that I made an error and I will learn from this.

Wasting time with you.

Sounds like everyone LOVES you:

"This is a special warning to all who might be foolish enough to 
associate with the mental case known as "People's Commissar" who also 
goes as "Tani Jantsang" but her real name is Phyllis Rose. She was 
tossed out on her can by the Church of Satan for her lying, bigotry and 
her threats to others. Before that she was tossed out of the radical 
Maoist International Movement for being a racist bigot and a fascist. 

To all who might think they are safe from her, buying her crazy books 
and nutty essays from her post office box there in Florida, think
again.
She has been known to threat and stalk real life! You have been warned!
"
http://www.groupsrv.com/religion/about60147.html
Why do you have so many enemies?
I could cite much more anti-Tani propaganda I found on the net if I
wanted to but why waste time with someone on your level.  I have
already wasted enough time here.
And if any CoS members associate with you as a "friend" then I question
their own personal judgement.  I wouldn't want to hang around with
someone who has been cursed by the CoS and other Satanists that she has
pissed off!  *gasps*
What did Anton Szandor LaVey say about those who said that he was
duping people out of money?
You don't get it.
Watch the video "Speak of the Devil" to hear it from his own lips.
Do you think they can keep the organization running for free like tax
free churches who bum for money?
And who would be stupid enough to start an organization with no type of
financial sup****t?
I think $200.00 is good because it helps screen out those who don't
take the philosophy/religion serious enough and just want to be
"joiners" so they can flash a spooky card around to scare old church
ladies.
Satanism is not a fa****on.
I don't think you are being very fair with your comments.
They also tried to help you and you reply by biting the hand that feeds
you.  What an asshole!
If you think treating others badly will get you somewhere in life then
you are blind to your own destruction.
I also wonder how many Destruction Rituals others have set out against
you based upon your own actions.
Laugh if you will but the universe contains many mysteries and that I
know.
I don't even have to do anything or even need to because your masochism
will justly reward you.
Sweet Dreams...
 




 195 Posts in Topic:
Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-15 01:23:38 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-15 14:27:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 01:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:04:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 21:21:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 23:08:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-18 22:07:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 00:11:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 13:49:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:02:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:22:20 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 02:15:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 05:08:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 16:13:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:12:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:52:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:50:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 16:06:58 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 12:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-21 15:31:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 18:58:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-23 20:00:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-23 22:03:23 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-24 05:06:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-24 10:52:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 16:26:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 18:09:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 18:31:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 19:04:07 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 23:22:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 04:21:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-28 12:07:19 
CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Satani
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 16:33:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"LarbGai" <l  2007-07-28 16:38:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 17:35:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-28 12:51:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-28 18:13:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:37:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:40:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:35:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-28 22:54:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 22:19:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:41:44 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 14:27:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 12:10:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:01:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:37:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:15:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:07:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 11:07:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:38:16 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 20:02:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:09:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 05:52:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 16:04:48 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 19:07:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 05:30:10 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:49:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 14:21:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:26:18 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 17:13:21 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:21:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:32:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:41:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:50:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:38:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:40:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:53:20 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 16:59:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:05:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:29:35 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:05:36 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:20:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:13:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:06:24 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:00:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:39:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:50:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 17:00:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:08:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 13:16:29 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 03:55:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:22:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:26:28 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:09:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:02:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 19:54:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:44:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:12:15 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:03:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-05 20:10:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:31:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:08:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:24:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:32:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:24:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:04:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:35:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-28 17:01:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:28:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-29 10:23:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:04:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 07:40:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 14:18:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-30 19:20:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 22:25:11 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 04:02:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:40:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 18:52:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:23:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 22:08:45 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:08:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:55:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:47:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:58:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-08-02 22:40:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 06:39:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 03:25:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 04:42:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:34:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:56:24 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:57:54 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:57:04 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:58:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-06 09:53:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 11:04:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-13 02:05:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-13 05:10:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:44:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-13 20:14:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:55:21 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-17 08:59:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:33:29 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:13:31 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:12:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:20:50 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:33:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:32:44 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:38:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:38:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:42:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-18 22:53:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-20 07:02:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-21 23:06:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-22 08:00:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-23 10:55:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Vlad Bam <seanbam@[EMA  2007-08-03 16:32:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-20 05:41:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 05:48:49 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:24:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 16:57:27 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:16:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 08:47:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 12:39:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
georgesx254@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 16:58:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:27:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:43:48 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 17:53:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:44:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 17:07:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:13:52 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:14:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 20:37:00 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:42:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:10 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 00:19:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 04:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:32:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
George <georgesx254@[E  2007-07-19 16:46:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:59:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-21 14:55:33 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Kori Houghton <korihou  2007-07-19 18:11:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 9:52:39 CDT 2008.