Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Satanism in Politics > Re: Satanists S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 38 of 195 Topic 269 of 353
Post > Topic >>

Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!

by jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (the 2nd coming of christ) Jul 28, 2007 at 04:21 AM

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:22:13 GMT, "Tani Jantsang ©"
<tjsrno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"the 2nd coming of christ" <jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:46aa3f59.86660910@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:31:55 GMT, "Tani Jantsang ©"
>> <tjsrno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>> please don't put words in my mouth. i never said a thing about
>>>> them being the same or acting the same.
>>>
>>>Well, I "heard" you as saying that Christians are all Christians (doh, 
>>>hmm).
>>>I see them as very different and I spelled out why very clearly.  I 
>>>spelled
>>>out another kind of view of the entire thing too.  The root and the
tree 
>>>and
>>>the fruit.
>>>
>>>i merely state the fact
>>>> that they're all (catholic, protestand and mormons) christian by
>>>> definition since they all accept christ as son of god and savior.
>>>> for a protestant to go to a catholic and tell him or her he or she
>>>> is not following christ is not only arrogant, but stupid in the
>>>> extreme. i mean, it takes the cake of stupid: protestanism CAME
>>>> from catholicism. in the early days of protestanism, it was almost
>>>> indistinguishable from catholicism. they even burned heretics (see
>>>> calvin burning of servetus).
>>>
>>>No one doubts that the ToS is VERY different from the COS.  Right? 
Well?
>>>Did one come from the other?  Yes?  They are definitely NOT the same
>>>religion.  Right?

i would consider both different branches of the same religion:
satanism...  seen from the POV of an outsider...  if however one
claims they're not longer satanism but setianism, then that's a
whole other religion at that point...

>>
>> you're not seriously suggesting catholics are not christian...
>> please tell me i'm understanding you wrong...
>
>Well, heh, the ones I knew, all Sicilians or Italians, I would find it
very 
>hard to see them as Christians. 

they are christian by definition. all that is required is belief
in christ as god and savior, that is it. that makes you christian
by definition, no matter what anybody says or how you act or
anything else. if you claim christ as your god you are christian.

>>>I think that comes from the same **** that tried 
>>>to
>>>ban alcohol during prohibition.
>>
>> well, to me it makes more sense that the pharma folks would want
>> it banned...  but i could be wrong, i suppose.
>
>They'd stand to make a FORTUNE if they made pot.  You kidding?

not if people grew it themselves...

>
>they do have that
>> sort of power and influence so that it would remain illegal if
>> they wanted to keep it illegal... and i think that's what happens.
>
>I don't think Big Pharma is against pot.  Oh ****, imagine the STOCK
MARKET?

lots of people are, i suppose. i hear you about the moralists, but
why can't they ban abortion if they have that much clout...
they'd like to think they can get pot banned but that's a lot of
different forces contributing to keep it illegal...and they happen
to be a small part of that...

>>
>>>>
>>>>> Europe might become
>>>>>Eurabia if they don't DO something drastic and fast.
>>>>
>>>> not a concern of mine what they do or become or how they run their
>>>> place. just keep good soccer and good pop music coming...
>>>>
>>>>>American Jews are a lot more leftist - most of them.  Israel is 
>>>>>Zionist -
>>>>>and that's right wing.
>>>>
>>>> there are anti-zionists within israel too... probably influenced
>>>> by american/leftist media...
>>>
>>>Yes, those would be the Jews that Jeff said "fight a war to lose." 
They
>>>need to get over that **** - and IGNORE world opinion.  In fact, **** 
>>>world
>>>opinion - everyone should ignore it.  Countries should do what's best
for
>>>their own people.
>>>>
>>>>>I do not want to see ww3.  Nuke have a nasty
>>>>>tendency to NOT stay where they blow up.  The **** spreads.  You just

>>>>>said
>>>>>what I said - basically that they know all too well what the CZs are
up
>>>>>to.
>>>>
>>>> pakistan just tested missiles capable of delivering nukes and
>>>> we're not trying to stop them...  hell: they even protect/harbor
>>>> al qaida and bin laden. that's enough reason to invade them, if we
>>>> were actually trying to stop terror rather than help spread it...
>>>
>>>I realize that the whole "war on terror" bull**** is just bull****.  I 
>>>once
>>>called bin Laden the new  Bogeyman and I wondered if the guy actually
>>>existed, LMAO.  We have no clash of civilization in the USA with these
>>>people over there.  The clash here is very different.
>>
>> here here... the real bin laden at first denied being behind
>> 9/11... i think the audio that surfaced years later where he
>> supposedly admits involvement is a fake...  no way to verify if
>> any of the audios that surface are actually from bin laden...
>
>Heh, they even went to the bother of making it look like a ****y video -
in 
>today's day and technology when the video would have been quite good. 
HA. 
>I know he first denied it.  And Bushy baby helped HIS FAMILY leave the 
>country after 9/11.  Michael Moore exposed that.

he put it on the big screen, that's for sure. the knowledge was
already in the public domain via the internet.

>>
>> bin laden's religion is the official religion of pakistan. it
>> doesn't get any more obvious who is behind him...
>>
>> the US actually sup****ts islamic terror to destabilize the region
>> and in turn that will weaken china and russia by extension...
>
>HA, Russia will side with them, and China already deals with them.  Keep
in 
>mind, half of Russia (the xUSSR) IS Moslem.

i should have said his particular sect, the wahabbist, since the
religion is islam and that controls the WHOLE middle east, not
just pakistan...  but then you have your different branches that
war against each other...like in iraq: sunnis vs ****ites, etc..

i guess they're like catholics vs protestants in that respect...
i'm not sure which branch is predominant in russia but i know the
fact that region is unstable hurts them and china economically.
markets like stability and peace, not chaos and mayhem...

-- 

``Could it be that ... political theater is being staged, very much like
the wrestling matches on TV, with the so-called neoconservatives and their
so-called enemies, such as Pat Buchanan, loudly making public statements
intended to convince the opponents of US foreign policy actions that these
actions are the fault of 'the Jews'?'' --Jared Israel/Emperor's Clothes
 




 195 Posts in Topic:
Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-15 01:23:38 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-15 14:27:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 01:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:04:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 21:21:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 23:08:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-18 22:07:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 00:11:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 13:49:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:02:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:22:20 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 02:15:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 05:08:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 16:13:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:12:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:52:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:50:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 16:06:58 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 12:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-21 15:31:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 18:58:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-23 20:00:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-23 22:03:23 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-24 05:06:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-24 10:52:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 16:26:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 18:09:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 18:31:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 19:04:07 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 23:22:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 04:21:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-28 12:07:19 
CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Satani
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 16:33:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"LarbGai" <l  2007-07-28 16:38:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 17:35:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-28 12:51:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-28 18:13:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:37:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:40:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:35:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-28 22:54:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 22:19:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:41:44 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 14:27:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 12:10:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:01:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:37:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:15:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:07:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 11:07:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:38:16 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 20:02:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:09:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 05:52:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 16:04:48 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 19:07:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 05:30:10 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:49:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 14:21:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:26:18 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 17:13:21 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:21:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:32:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:41:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:50:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:38:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:40:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:53:20 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 16:59:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:05:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:29:35 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:05:36 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:20:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:13:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:06:24 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:00:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:39:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:50:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 17:00:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:08:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 13:16:29 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 03:55:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:22:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:26:28 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:09:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:02:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 19:54:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:44:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:12:15 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:03:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-05 20:10:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:31:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:08:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:24:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:32:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:24:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:04:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:35:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-28 17:01:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:28:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-29 10:23:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:04:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 07:40:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 14:18:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-30 19:20:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 22:25:11 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 04:02:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:40:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 18:52:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:23:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 22:08:45 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:08:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:55:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:47:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:58:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-08-02 22:40:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 06:39:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 03:25:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 04:42:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:34:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:56:24 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:57:54 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:57:04 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:58:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-06 09:53:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 11:04:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-13 02:05:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-13 05:10:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:44:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-13 20:14:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:55:21 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-17 08:59:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:33:29 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:13:31 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:12:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:20:50 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:33:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:32:44 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:38:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:38:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:42:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-18 22:53:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-20 07:02:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-21 23:06:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-22 08:00:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-23 10:55:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Vlad Bam <seanbam@[EMA  2007-08-03 16:32:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-20 05:41:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 05:48:49 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:24:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 16:57:27 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:16:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 08:47:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 12:39:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
georgesx254@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 16:58:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:27:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:43:48 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 17:53:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:44:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 17:07:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:13:52 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:14:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 20:37:00 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:42:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:10 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 00:19:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 04:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:32:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
George <georgesx254@[E  2007-07-19 16:46:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:59:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-21 14:55:33 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Kori Houghton <korihou  2007-07-19 18:11:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Nov 18 17:40:02 CST 2008.