Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Satanism in Politics > Re: Satanists S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 164 of 195 Topic 269 of 342
Post > Topic >>

Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!

by "Tani Jantsang ©" <tjsrno@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 21, 2007 at 11:06 PM

"the 2nd coming of christ" <jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:46c7784f.90748737@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:42:34 -0400, "Tani Jantsang ©"
> <tjsrno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Delila" <watertiger9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:Czoxi.358$jy6.154@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Tani Jantsang ©" <tjsrno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:13cbjolkcqoa5a5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also know this about them - if you push them SO far, and it's
coming 
>>>> to
>>>> that, you are GOING to awaken the BEAST in them.  And I know that's
>>>> coming.
>>>> That's what happened in Nazi Germany.  The Beast woke up - and don't 
>>>> you
>>>> ever think that this happened out the blue for no reason.  OH YES
there
>>>> were
>>>> reasons.  And that alone makes me wonder HOW STUPID these anti 
>>>> Europeans
>>>> could possibly be that they REPEAT the same ****ing **** they did the
>>>> last
>>>> time around that PROVOKED a Hitler to rise to power.  The same people
>>>> have
>>>> REPEATED the same ****.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, not the same people. The grandchildren of those other people who

>>> did
>>> that other **** before and during WW2.
>>
>>Same politics, same critique of the culture.  Same methods.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Blacks ran a hospital in California - and of course, it was run like
>>>> something in Africa, terrible.  Now it's run by Hispanics.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are they running it any better?
>>
>>Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Heh.  I told you
>>>> I saw a pattern.  I have run into blacks that had to move from E. 
>>>> Florida
>>>> because they couldn't get hired anywhere for any job - and they WERE
>>>> qualified.  They don't have too much luck here either where
independent
>>>> contractors are abundant.  Independent contractors can make a LOT of
>>>> money, if they have their heads screwed on right.  All of the ones I 
>>>> see
>>>> are either white or Hispanic - all of them.  They know HOW to do it. 
>>>> In
>>>> that kind of set up, NO ONE can hold your hand.  There is NO 
>>>> affirmative
>>>> action going on at all with independents.  They are TRULY free
agents.
>>>>
>>>> There was one black lawn business in my town.  It's no longer in
>>>> business. I hired the guy 2 times.  We do it ourselves now, we don't 
>>>> need
>>>> anyone ELSE to do all that for us.  We bought a ride on mower and
weed
>>>> wacker and we know where to get chemicals.  The only ones in business
>>>> here are white and some Hispanics.  When you are an independent, you 
>>>> are
>>>> not working FOR anyone where the company sends you out with company
>>>> equipment.  You have to, in the lawn service, OWN ride on mowers, OWN
>>>> weed wackers, be able to get chemicals and a whole lot of other stuff
>>>> that you have to be able to PLAN for in advance.    You need to have
a
>>>> license, too.
>>>
>>>
>>> So you're saying that blacks don't have the discipline to work for
>>> themselves?
>>
>>They did fine for themselves when they were BY themselves - they had
their
>>own economy, their own doctors, lawyers and whatever else.  They were 
>>happy
>>to be with themselves.  Of course, back then they also did not DARE do
>>crimes against non-blacks, either.
>>
>>Am I saying something?  Rhodesia used to be properous.  Now it's a 
>>****hole
>>called Zimbabwe.  Haiti also was prosperous.  Then a revolution made who

>>ran
>>it switch hands.  Well?  Heh.  It's a hell hole.
>>
>>Blacks have measurably and significantly higher levels of testosterone -

>>and
>>yes, that can make violence.  They also have lower IQs - significantly
>>lower.  Add those two things together and you can PREDICT how they'd run
a
>>country.
>>
>>Quite frankly, I don't give a **** about them - OR their problems.  But 
>>they
>>try to blame others for every failure that hits them due to their own
>>****ups - and that's like blaming the devil.  It's rubbish.
>>
>>No matter where they are or when, they just NEVER seem to be able to get
>>their **** together and get it right without ****ing it all up.  No 
>>excuses.
>
> that doesn't seem they had it good when they were being lynched
> and killed and burned alive and all that...   i mean, it may not
> be an excuse but it must have sucked somewhat...

I am talking about way after slavery was all over with.  Keep in mind, the

Slavs were also slaves until 1865.  Right now there are some blacks
pu****ng 
to try to get a totally segregated school because they KNOW they did much 
better when they were with their own, in their own schools.  Now they're 
pathetic.  I'd suggest you READ Chuck D's book - but I kinda have an idea 
that you don't like reading "long letters" - forget about whole books.

Ha - to top that one off, Harvard U professor, a liberal that doesn't want

to publish his findings (ooops, they leaked out anyway) - diversity proves

to be very HARMFUL in many ways.  HA!! I could have told him that.  Pipe 
dreams have a way of cra****ng down when the brick called reality gets
heaved 
hard enough.
>
>>>
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
>
> ``Could it be that ... political theater is being staged, very much like

> the wrestling matches on TV, with the so-called neoconservatives and
their 
> so-called enemies, such as Pat Buchanan, loudly making public statements

> intended to convince the opponents of US foreign policy actions that
these 
> actions are the fault of 'the Jews'?'' --Jared Israel/Emperor's Clothes
>
>
>
 




 195 Posts in Topic:
Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-15 01:23:38 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-15 14:27:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 01:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:04:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:04:16 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 21:21:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 23:08:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-18 22:07:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 00:11:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 13:49:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:02:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:22:20 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 02:15:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 05:08:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:04:22 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 16:13:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 17:12:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:07:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:52:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:50:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 16:06:58 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 12:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-21 15:31:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-21 18:58:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-23 20:00:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-23 22:03:23 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-24 05:06:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-24 10:52:32 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 16:26:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 18:09:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 18:31:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-27 19:04:07 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-27 23:22:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 04:21:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-28 12:07:19 
CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Satani
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 16:33:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"LarbGai" <l  2007-07-28 16:38:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 17:35:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-28 12:51:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-28 18:13:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:37:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:40:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-28 20:35:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-28 22:54:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 22:19:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 06:41:44 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 14:27:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 12:10:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:01:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:37:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:15:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:07:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 11:07:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-29 15:38:16 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-29 20:02:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 05:09:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 05:52:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-30 16:04:48 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-30 19:07:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 05:30:10 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:49:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 14:21:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:26:18 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-07-31 17:13:21 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:21:52 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:32:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:41:23 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:50:04 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:38:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:40:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:53:20 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 16:59:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:05:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:29:35 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:05:36 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:20:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:13:50 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:06:24 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:00:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-01 15:39:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:50:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-02 17:00:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-03 03:08:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 13:16:29 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 03:55:05 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:22:41 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:26:28 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:09:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:02:54 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 19:54:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:44:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:12:15 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:03:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-05 20:10:17 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-03 11:31:00 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-04 04:08:37 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-04 07:24:19 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 03:32:39 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2007-08-05 09:24:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-05 19:04:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
Rockinghorse Winner <r  2007-07-29 23:57:25 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 04:35:57 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-28 17:01:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 00:28:46 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-29 10:23:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-29 18:04:34 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 07:40:03 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-30 14:18:56 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
<theloneranger100@[EMA  2007-07-30 19:20:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-07-30 22:25:11 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 04:02:43 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:40:49 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 18:52:51 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 13:23:47 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-31 22:08:45 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 16:10:40 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 02:08:27 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 02:25:33 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-01 19:55:08 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-01 16:47:14 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-02 03:58:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-08-02 00:41:55 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"BAM" <mcca5  2007-08-02 22:40:26 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-03 06:39:59 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 03:25:42 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 04:42:01 
Re: CATHOLICS ARE CHRISTIAN BY DEFINITION...PERIOD. (WAS: Re: Sa
r@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R   2007-07-31 05:34:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:56:24 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:56:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:57:54 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"9" <nine@[E  2007-08-04 05:57:04 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-04 11:58:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-06 09:53:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-12 04:11:02 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-12 11:04:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-13 02:05:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-13 05:10:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:44:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-13 20:14:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 01:55:21 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-17 08:59:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:33:29 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:13:31 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:12:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:20:50 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:33:39 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 14:32:44 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 12:38:36 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Delila" <wa  2007-08-17 21:38:42 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-17 23:42:34 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-18 22:53:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-20 07:02:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-21 23:06:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-22 08:00:03 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-08-23 10:55:14 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Vlad Bam <seanbam@[EMA  2007-08-03 16:32:08 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-20 05:41:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-17 02:42:40 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 05:48:49 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-17 15:24:17 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-17 16:57:27 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 04:16:11 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 08:47:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-18 12:39:57 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
georgesx254@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-18 16:58:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 06:27:59 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:43:48 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 17:53:56 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 14:44:13 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 17:07:51 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 18:13:52 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:14:47 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-19 20:37:00 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:42:01 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:10 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:45:18 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-20 00:19:12 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 04:24:41 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-19 20:32:05 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"Tani Jantsang ©&quo  2007-07-19 23:55:55 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
George <georgesx254@[E  2007-07-19 16:46:35 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-07-20 06:59:26 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
"user" <user  2007-07-21 14:55:33 
Re: Satanists Say NO To Drugs!
Kori Houghton <korihou  2007-07-19 18:11:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 20:29:17 CDT 2008.