Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Satanism in Politics > Messenger and M...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 279 of 336
Post > Topic >>

Messenger and Message Inseparable

by "Nyi Roro Jonggrang" <mendut15@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 2, 2007 at 08:46 AM

Messenger and Message Inseparable
[Return to the Table of Contents]
[Return to the Homepage]


Attempts to Make "Testimony of Jesus" of "None Effect"
How Satan Unsettles Confidence
Testing Contem****ary Claims
Another Church to Follow?
The Final Shaking-a Prediction
Message and Messenger Inseparable
Endnotes
Study Questions


  "Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on. . . . that they
may 
rest from their labors, and their works follow them" (Rev. 14:13).
As we have noted throughout this book, whenever God has spoken through His

communication system, counterfeits soon followed. Satan is unceasing in
his 
skill to follow through the door that truth opens. His messages are always

appealing and believable because he knows how to appeal to the religiously

inclined yet unconverted heart. He mixes truth with error, always in a way

that appeals to human feeling and human authority rather than to a plain 
"Thus saith the Lord."

After the death of Ellen White, counterfeit messengers soon arose. In June

22, 1916, less than a year after Mrs. White died, Margaret Rowen in Los 
Angeles, California, claimed to have a vision. Her early "testimonies" had
a 
superficial likeness to Mrs. White's testimonies. In addition to these 
"messages," the physical manifestations accompanying her visions were 
remarkably similar to those of Ellen White. "Both her followers, including

several medical doctors, and skeptics agreed that these visions were 
supernaturally inspired. The question in dispute was: With which 
supernatural power did they originate?"1

Mrs. Rowen's attempt to usurp the role of "messenger" to the Adventist 
Church reached extraordinary lengths when she had a do***ent "planted" in 
the Ellen G. White vault at Elmshaven, pur****ting to be a letter written
by 
Mrs. White. This "letter" was intended to prove that she was Ellen White's

designated successor. Even after this scandalous episode was exposed, her 
followers remained strongly sup****tive.

Rowen's specific but failed predictions culminated in her announcement
that 
Jesus would return on February 6, 1925. This failed prediction caused many

followers to wonder, but many accepted her explanation-that she had 
misunderstood how long it would take Jesus to travel from heaven to earth.

Further elements in this strange story may be found in Light Bearers to
the 
Remnant, including her attempt to murder her chief sup****ter and her jail 
time in San Quentin Penitentiary.2

We cite the Rowen story only to highlight the often captivating appeal of 
those who claim to have the prophetic gift. At any given time in the last 
few decades, at least a dozen people around the world have convinced
others 
that they have been given the gift of prophecy. These include V. T.
Houteff, 
Jeanine Sautron, and those supposedly receiving "thought messages."3

According to John the Revelator, Satan will be especially furious with 
last-day representatives of those "who keep the commandments of God and
have 
the testimony of Jesus Christ" (Rev.12:17). As we noted earlier (p. 3),
"the 
testimony of Jesus" points to God's communication system whereby the
Spirit 
of Christ inspires selected men and women with divine revelations
pertaining 
to the plan of salvation.



Attempts to Make "Testimony of Jesus" of "None Effect"
[Top of Do***ent]

Because of the nature of the great controversy, Satan hates the truth
about 
God and how He plans to rescue men and women from Planet Earth. 
Consequently, he will do all his brilliant mind can devise to make "the 
testimony of Jesus Christ" of no effect. That should be expected.

Ellen White knew from experience and from divine instruction how Satan's 
tactics affected her ministry, and how he would operate in the future. In 
1890 she wrote two letters:

"Satan is . . . constantly pressing in the spurious-to lead away from the 
truth. The very last deception of Satan will be to make of none effect the

testimony of the Spirit of God. 'Where there is no vision, the people
perish' 
(Prov. 29:18). Satan will work ingeniously, in different ways and through 
different agencies, to unsettle the confidence of God's remnant people in 
the true testimony."4

"There will be a hatred kindled against the testimonies which is satanic. 
The workings of Satan will be to unsettle the faith of the churches in
them, 
for this reason: Satan cannot have so clear a track to bring in his 
deceptions and bind up souls in his delusions if the warnings and reproofs

and counsels of the Spirit of God are heeded."5



How Satan Unsettles Confidence
[Top of Do***ent]

If Satan's plan is to "ingeniously. . . unsettle . . . confidence," how
does 
he do it?

Since the Garden of Eden, for reasons not always clear, a person's 
confidence in the truth about God has always been the special target of 
others who are not comfortable with divine authority. That is the way the 
cosmic controversy began, and that is the way it will end. To break down 
confidence in the trustworthiness of God and His gifted prophets has
always 
been Satan's chief goal. How does he do his work? By subtle insinuations, 
out-of-context allegations, planted rumors, and exaggerated assertions
borne 
out of an incident that often could be easily explained.6

We should expect that the same methods used by Satan to "unsettle" 
confidence in Moses, Elijah, Jeremiah, John the Baptist, or even Christ 
Himself, would be used with practiced precision on the ministry of Ellen 
White, or any future messenger from God.

When any issue arises today (or will yet arise between now and the return
of 
Jesus), we should immediately ask: (1) If the allegation involves Ellen 
White as a person, what are all the facts? (2) If the question concerns
her 
theological teachings, what is the theological or philosophical 
presupposition that underlies the questioner's (or "unsettler's") point of

view?7

That difficult-to-understand technical questions and isolated points
should 
arise in a writing ministry of 70 years is not surprising. Similar
questions 
confront students of the Bible. Many people through the years have lost 
confidence in the Bible because of real or apparent difficulties.8

Why does this happen? Those who lose confidence often place more emphasis
on 
the container than on its content, on the messenger rather than on his or 
her message. How does one focus on the content rather than the container,
on 
the message rather than the messenger? How does one focus on Ellen White's

message rather than on Ellen White herself?9 By listening to her clear, 
prevailing message that illuminates the Bible's focus on the character of 
God as manifested in Jesus and about His simple plan to change rebels into

restored sons and daughters. The message of genuine prophets is
consistent, 
whereas their lives, although exemplary, may not be without flaws.

Even when a group accepts Ellen White as God's messenger, differences of 
opinion will exist as to how to apply her principles to present 
cir***stances. However, an honest, shared commitment to divine authority 
warms the heart of those who differ; differences are not magnified to the 
point of open contention. Those who focus on the content, not the
container, 
seek to draw near to those who differ; they emphasize the principles upon 
which they agree, and minimize their differences.

One other way that the writings of Ellen White (or the Bible) can be made 
"of none effect" is to misuse counsel. Some would call it the "woodshed
rod" 
whereby the phrase, "Sister White said . . ." kindles deep resentment
rather 
than appreciation.10 Sadly, for many, both young and old, the
"Testimonies" 
have suggested dread rather than blessing, a chill rather than warmth. Out

of context and separated from intent, the writings of Ellen White can
easily 
become a whip or club-just the opposite of her purpose when she wrote 
messages of warning and challenge to those who knew exactly the truth of 
what she was saying.

The best way to thwart Satan's attempt to make of "none effect" the
ministry 
of Ellen White is to "listen" to her prevailing message about God's side
in 
the great controversy, to read her published works11 as the final
statement 
as to what she believed on any given subject, to place every word that
seems 
discouraging in its original context-and then to sit back and marvel at
the 
coherency of a remarkable messenger whose ministry has accomplished such 
profound worldwide results.



Testing Contem****ary Claims
[Top of Do***ent]

Is it possible that another genuine prophet will appear in the Seventh-day

Adventist Church before Christ returns? Adventists have never said that 
Ellen White is the complete fulfillment of such prophecies as Joel
2:28-32. 
Mrs. White herself was asked this question and responded that she had not 
been given any information on that subject.12

No one knows what God may think best regarding special leader****p before
the 
Advent. And no one knows in what manner a future prophet may fulfill his
or 
her role. What we do know is that a church has the obligation to test the 
claim, as Paul has taught: "Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise 
prophecies. Test all things; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every
form 
of evil" (1 Thess. 5:19-22).

All the tests listed earlier must be applied to each claimant.13 The
highest 
test of all is to compare later prophets with the body of inspired
writings 
of previous prophets.

Jesus made it clear that the church should expect the appearance of 
counterfeit prophets, especially in the last days before His return: "Then

many false prophets will rise up and deceive many" (Matt. 24:11). No doubt

very persuasive and believable claimants will arise. What makes them 
"believable"?

Counterfeiters don't print three-dollar bills. The purpose of the 
counterfeit is to appear as close to the original or the valid as
possible. 
Satan knows this tactic well. His method has always been to cover error
with 
much truth. Eventually, the error also becomes part of the truth in their 
minds.

Ellen White wrote to one who was confused about Anna Phillips's claim that

she had received visions and messages: "Many things in these visions and 
dreams seem to be all straight, a repetition of that which has been in the

field for many years; but soon they introduce a jot here, a tittle of
error 
there, just a little seed which takes root and flourishes, and many are 
defiled therewith."14

Yes, another genuine prophet is possible. And yes, if such a prophet
should 
arise, his or her credentials will meet the tests that every true prophet
in 
God's communication system has met.



Another Church to Follow?
[Top of Do***ent]

Occasionally the thought is expressed that "the Adventist ****p is going 
through, no matter what!" Equally confident people say that "the church is

Babylon" and a new organization must be formed to nurture "true
believers." 
Both groups appeal to Ellen White for their authority. Here is another 
instance where careful study will avoid the unthinking optimism of some
and 
the undue pessimism of others. Here again, without Ellen White modern
church 
members would be adrift in their speculation.

Prophets, beginning with Moses, have always been identified with rebuke
and 
reproof, as well as with encouragement and promise. People can read 
selectively and, depending on what they are looking for, they could
consider 
Jeremiah or Isaiah either prophets of doom or of hope. Such may also be
true 
with Ellen White.

She courageously pointed out to fewer than 3,000 fellow church members in 
1856 that the Laodicean message (Rev. 3) applies to Seventh-day
Adventists. 
That was very sobering to a people who saw themselves virtually alone in
the 
world as those who "keep the commandments of God and have the faith of 
 Jesus" (Rev. 14:12).

At the same time, she said very clearly that "God has invested His church 
with special authority and power which no one can be justified in 
disregarding and despising; for in so doing he despises the voice of
God."15

Though she used strong language to describe the spiritual lethargy of the 
church, she was equally emphatic regarding its high destiny: "Has God no 
living church? He has a church, but it is the church militant, not the 
church triumphant. We are sorry that there are defective members, that
there 
are tares amid the wheat. . . . Let all be careful not to make an outcry 
against the only people who are fulfilling the description given of the 
remnant people who keep the commandments of God, and have faith in Jesus.
. 
.. . God has a distinct people, a church on earth, second to none, but 
superior to all in their facilities to teach the truth, to vindicate the
law 
of God."16

In the early 1900s, when certain forces within the church were attempting
to 
deflect the church's message and mission, she steadied those who
"listened" 
with courage and optimism: "We cannot now step off the foundation that God

has established. We cannot now enter into any new organization, for this 
would mean apostasy from the truth."17

With a further look into the future, she wrote in 1908: "I am instructed
to 
say to Seventh-day Adventists the world over, God has called us as a
people 
to be a peculiar treasure unto Himself. He has appointed that His church
on 
earth shall stand perfectly united in the Spirit and counsel of the Lord
of 
hosts to the end of time."18

Revelation 3 depicts no last-day church beyond Laodicea, thus giving hope 
that some day many of them will repent, overcome, and fulfill God's plan
for 
the last-day church (Rev. 3:18-21). No other subject for any
church-related 
agenda, either for individuals or institutions, can be more urgent or 
im****tant to implement.



The Final Shaking-a Prediction
[Top of Do***ent]

One of Ellen White's unfulfilled predictions relates to future events. Key

words that describe the forces that will focus on Seventh-day Adventists
are 
"sifting" and "shaking."

Human beings have been sifted by trials and temptations ever since the 
Garden of Eden, but Ellen White foresaw a time prior to the close of 
probation when special cir***stances will test and sift every Adventist.
The 
special sifting is often called the "shaking" time. Sometimes she uses the

term "shaking" to refer to the process19 by which all church members will
be 
tested; at other times she refers to the profound shaking that will
prevail 
during the Seven Last Plagues.20

Some of the causes of the final shaking within the Adventist Church will
be:

· Persecution from outside the church.21

· Erroneous doctrines within the church.22

· Prevailing worldliness caused by not having experienced "the love of the

truth," or being "sanctified through obedience to the truth."23

· Resistance to the "straight testimony called forth by the counsel of the

True Witness to the Laodiceans."24

· Specific rejection of the sanctuary doctrine involving the significance
of 
the pre-advent judgment and the relation****p between the cleansed
sanctuary 
and cleansed people.25

· Rejection of the ministry of Ellen White.26

The impact of the shaking on Seventh-day Adventists will be enormous:

· Defections among church leaders.27

· Apostasies of ministers who have preached false doctrine.28

· The church will seem about to fall.29

· An impressive number of church members will leave.30

· New converts will take the place of the defectors.31

· Preparation for the crisis involves developing habits of enthusiasm, 
courage, and loyalty.32



Message and Messenger Inseparable
[Top of Do***ent]

Robert S. Folkenberg, eighteenth president of the General Conference,
summed 
up the convictions of many, past and present, when he wrote: "Without
[the] 
invaluable contributions from the Spirit of Prophecy, I suspect the 
Seventh-day Adventist Church wouldn't even exist. From the earliest days
of 
this movement, Ellen White's pen and voice have counseled, guided, and led

God's people to a deeper level of spiritual experience, to higher
standards 
of personal living, and to clearer concepts of truth."33

Dr. Jack Provonsha noted that without Ellen White there would be no 
Seventh-day Adventist Church today but he warned regarding the church's 
future. In reviewing the Adventist movement from its beginning, he
asserted: 
"They had their Bible. But they had in large measure that other ingredient

for a religious movement's vitality-the sense that they had been called by

God and that He was in their movement! Had He not vouchsafed His presence 
with the gift of prophetic guidance? That made all the difference. Without

such a sense at the beginning, there would not now even be a Seventh-day 
Adventist Church, at least one that made a great deal of difference to the

world. The obvious corollary to this is that if that sense is ever lost,
the 
church, even if it continues to exist institutionally, may no longer count

where and in the way that it is supposed to count."

A few pages later, Dr. Provonsha wrote: "I have quoted liberally from
Ellen 
G. White. I make no apology for this. She is my 'spiritual mother.' She
has 
also been absolutely central to the life and thought of Adventism."34

Telling the story of the birth of Israel as a nation is impossible without

reviewing the work of Moses, its prophet. How would one explain the Exodus

without Moses? Or Mount Sinai? Or why Israel had to wander in the
wilderness 
for forty years?

So it is impossible to tell the story of the Seventh-day Adventist
movement 
without interweaving Ellen White's ministry in the affirmation of Biblical

doctrine, in the building of a church organization strong enough to
sup****t 
a world church, and in the Moses-like messages of reproof and courage that

helped to shape the character of the church. Without her today it is 
probable that the Adventist Church would be only a footnote in some
history 
book of various religious groups in the nineteenth century.

Arthur G. Daniells, General Conference president from 1901-1922, lifted
his 
pen in a plea to fellow church members not to follow the pattern of
history: 
"It is possible to believe nominally in the gift of prophecy, to accept
the 
messages of former prophets, and yet reject and oppose a contem****ary 
messenger chosen of God to give instruction to His people. In Christ's day

the words of the ancient prophets were read every Sabbath in their 
synagogues, yet the religious leaders rejected John the Baptist and 
crucified the Prophet who came direct from heaven-the greatest who ever 
appeared on earth. . . . It was Christ's rebuke of specific sins in their 
life that caused the Pharisees to reject His claim of being the Son of
God. 
There is today, as there has always been in the past, a direct relation 
between the cheri****ng of some sin and a doubting of the messages of the 
Lord's chosen servants."35

To keep the Adventist ****p on course as it heads toward harbor, the
message 
that set its course must remain as unclouded and as effective as an ocean 
liner's compass and radar. And to keep the message relevant and
meaningful, 
the Messenger who first framed the message must be listened to as the
harbor 
pilot, especially as the ****p enters the turbulence of the narrows, close
to 
****t.

"Therefore I have hewn them by the prophets" (Hosea 6:5, RSV).

"Believe in the Lord your God, and you will be established; believe his 
prophets, and you will succeed" (2 Chron. 20:20, RSV).
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Messenger and Message Inseparable
"Nyi Roro Jonggrang&  2007-12-02 08:46:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 16:07:01 CDT 2008.