Re: NAACP no longer legitimate, but neither was HandCallous Vaselineitus!

In article <lolg0256qt6u4e7hrvcpc5l66mns8786d4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 laffs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'em-all.com wrote:

> On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:19:03 -0500, ray
> <xxxrayted@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> >Well you see, I thought you knew more than that.  The Republican party 
> >was started when several states wanted to join this union with the 
> >exception of keeping their Black slaves.  
> 
> Those who wanted to do away with slavery were
> considered......What, deologically?
> 
> Progressive/liberal, not so?
> 
> 
> 
> Those who wanted to keep slaves, remain "unchanged",
> and "preserve the status quo" were
> considered......."conservatives", were they not?
> 
> THose who believed that by limiting "states rights"
> (with government) argued that using a central
> government to override "states rights" was "big
> government", is that not correct?
> 
> I thought you had some intellectual ability to think
> beyond the rightwing propaganda and see through the
> argument of "limited government" and what it meant
> then, as opposed to now.

It's not "right wing propaganda" it's history.