In article <1147542707.373464.104820@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Paul Mitchum" <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ray wrote:
> > In article <1147505921.902489.76170@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "Paul Mitchum" <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > ray wrote:
> > > > In article
<1147481570.684087.128540@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > > "Paul Mitchum" <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The Constitutional separation of powers is under attack, thanks
to a
> > > > > lawless President and his co-conspirator Republican
Congresscritters.
> > > > > We live in a police state where Republicans have applauded the
> > > > > erosion
> > > > > of civil rights while the President breaks very im****tant laws
and
> > > > > spies on us without a warrant. We have no legitimacy in the
foreign
> > > > > theater because Bush and his Republican sycophants lied to the
world
> > > > > about the threat posed by Iraq and wasted the goodwill of other
> > > > > nations
> > > > > after 9/11.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the current sorry state of affairs has any single cause, it's
the
> > > > > Republican party's corruption, bigotry, and arrogance.
> > > >
> > > > Police state? Erosion of Civil Rights? My lord, they really did
a
> > > > number on you, didn't they?
> > >
> > > What is your specific criticism of what I have written? Please
> > > criticise a point of fact. Offer a rational argument, rather than
the
> > > ad hominem you've presented.
> >
> > Oh, you mean be as specific as you?
>
> If you have a specific criticism, please offer it. I will address it
> specifically. I realize that it can be a shock to realize that you
> voted in a police state to oppress yourself, but you're going to have
> to come to terms with it so we can all work together and end it.
> So deal with facts. Ask me what I mean, rather than gawking like a
> three-year-old.
I'm only responding in the way I was addressed. If you make such a
blanket accusation, don't be too surprised on getting a blanket
response. In no way did your post include any specifics.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--


|