Re: Does Ron Paul have a chance?

"Hugh Gibbons" <hugh_gibbons@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:hugh_gibbons-09FFEE.21174420092007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Why did you sup****t attacking a SECULAR state?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>    What secular state? Iraq? BULL****! You can't be that
>> >> >>>>>>>> ignorant,
>> >> >>>>>>>> can you?
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Yes, Iraq was a secular state.  This was one of the reasons
>> >> >>>>>>> Hussein
>> >> >>>>>>> had so few friends in the region.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>    Sorry. Hussein was a Sun'ni Baathist.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> But he ran the government as a secular entity.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Bull****.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> No, quite accurate.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Not quite accurate.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, 100% accurate.   Under Saddam the Government nor the Courts
>> >> > operated
>> >> > under ****ria law, it was a secular body.
>> >>
>> >>     No they operated under Mr. Saddam's law. If you were a Kurd  -
YOU
>> >> DIE!
>> >> If you were a Christian - YOU DIE! If you were ****'ah YOU DIE!
>> >
>> > That's ridiculous.  Tariq Aziz (a.k.a. Mikhail Yuhanna), was DEPUTY 
>> > PRIME
>> > MINISTER and he was a Chaldean Catholic.
>>
>> And also a Baathist. Fascist.  Sometime take time to see the
do***entary
>> "Saddam and the Third Reich."  Maybe you'll come to understand
something
>> more than the simplistic.
>
> Is that going to tell me they are Sunni fanatics bent on wiping out the
> Kurds and ****ite Arabs?

    Nothing is going to "TELL" you anything. Shouting at a brick wall is 
futile.