Re: Who Does Al Qaeda Want In The White House?

Don Homuth wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:26:00 -0800, SMITH29 <smith29@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>> I figure it isn't McCain.....
>> His party didn't cut off the listening of traffic.
>> Now the terrorists are protected by Democrats who say it's a rights 
>> violation. Aww shucks.
>> http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/archives/005171.php
> 
> Thus far, ObL should be pleased with having Dubya in the WH. Pretty
> much every objective he promulgated early on has been met.
xxxx
You said that, not Osama.
Fact is he's calling for more violence as Iraq slows in violence in 
general. We have the son of a ***** living like a rat underground 
knowing so long as Bush is President the Osama will remain in great 
danger of being murdered by savage American troops.

   We're out
> of Saudi Arabia, we've energized the al Qaeda movement, we've elevated
> what was theretofore a minor movement into a Major Threat, we've given
> him recruiting fodder for his Noble Jihad,
xxxx
News says he's down to old women and young children for walking bombs.

  we've not managed to do
> Anything to help resolve the Palestinian problem,
xxxx
We will NEVER resolve the Palestinian problem.

  we've ruined our
> economy by borrowing money to finance the war,
xxxx
I doubt the alternative is acceptable, at least to this administration.
You want dialog with Osama?


  we've Not undertaken
> any significant measures to reduce our reliance on petroleum, thereby
> sending ever more money to the folks who finance him...
xxxx
You read the dissenters to alternate fuels the same as I do.
The Algore no drill faction and the E85 dissenters really help us out.
It's the left that hamper progress fearing someone will make money off 
new technology.
> 
> Und so weiter.
> 
> If McCain promises to do the same things, how can ObL possibly be
> harmed?
xxxx
Nobody said he would ever get the chance.
He's for elimination of Al Qaeda and other terrorist factions and 
received the endorsement of the President which means only a few votes 
will go his way.
I get the feeling the public is going to vote in a pacifist socialist
to restore the tax base and kiss Osama's ass.
In a way it might work until the Middle East gets enough strength to
bring the war here which is on Osama's wish list.
He has said he wants to kill every infidel on the planet and our 
Democrat candidates want to arbitrate with love and compassion and all 
the other warm cuddly words they can assemble. Obama and Hillary will 
tell you what you want to hear simply to get elected and right now 
surrender is at the top of the list along with a national health care 
program and taxing the cor****ations and the rich in the Robin Hood plan 
the Dem's have been touting for a long time now.

Nancy and company have allowed the terrorists to use all modes of 
communication without fear of their constitutional rights being violated 
and I wonder where terrorism qualifies for constitutional rights.
That means we will have to indict Osama and arrest him rather than kill 
him through a military action.
The prisoners in Gitmo will end up living in the US carrying out various 
terrorist deeds because they have constitutional rights too.
They will be paid in our money which we gladly give them for oil because 
we don't want an American farmer to make money off dent corn while some 
kids in a third world country goes hungry. In a Moonbats mind it's our 
fault people off shore starve to death and the Iraq war is also our 
fault. I understand that mind set very well having heard it for years.

29