On Mar 23, 10:16=A0am, Buford Cranston <cicer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> kwag7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<kwag7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Owner****p of property is either private or not. =A0If it is not, then
it=
> > isn't capitalism. =A0It's mixed socialism.
>
> You sound like a Marxist.
If the basis of capitalism is private property owner****p and freedom
to contract, what do you infer from a system predicated upon public
property owner****p and the government's legitimate right to interfere
in freedom of contract, ala the US? The US economy is mixed
socialism. Before you answer, look up the Lost Liberty Hotel, and the
SCOTUS case that led to the idea.
