Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Mao Socialism > Re: Why does th...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1175 of 1300
Post > Topic >>

Re: Why does the radical left ban things that are harmless or good?

by "robw" <noddy093@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 17, 2008 at 08:57 PM

If Limpballs is the wisest of them all......you are seriously f*cked.


"Captain Compassion" <darance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22c212a316ae548c989e43@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joe <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > because stupid people vote for them.  there are a lot of ignorant
> > people.  yesterday algore blamed tomato salmonella on W, and there are
> > alot of morons that believe that crap.
> >
> the radical left persists in denying the rational, sane, fair and
balanced
> right to spread lies and poison the environment even though the
environment
> belongs to us and nobody else.  Why!  They contiue to refute the lie
that
DDT
> was banned for use in fighting Malaria, when the Stockholm accord only
ever
> banned it for large scale agriculture abuse.
>
> we are powerless against them, even Limbaugh is unable to fight them and
he
> is the wisest of us all.
>
> experts now say that communists are behind the worlds leading scientific
> bodies when they use over 1,000 peer reviewed papers and mounting
evidence
> that global warming is happening, while all we are able to come up with
are
> crackpots and paid energy industry lobbyists who have nothing but hot
air!
>
> this is clearly a conspiracy of the highest order!
>
> Here is what one of our experts on global warming says:
>
> Global warming? No
>
> Communists are behind the climate change movement; the Earth goes
through
> periods of warming, cooling.
>
> Rudy Rinker
>
> Climate change/global warming is a scam.
>
> This movement has become a religion and the faithful will never listen
to
> logic and/or reason. Most are not aware that this movement is an anti-
> capitalist, anti-free enterprise movement. It has nothing to do with
climate
> change but everything to do with weakening America. When the Berlin wall
fell
> in the late '80s, the communists had no where to go but soon found that
the
> environmentalists were getting a foothold with our political leaders. It
has
> become the perfect venue to alarm the folks on doom and gloom. The sad
thing
> is that most people buying into this madness are so emotional and
unwilling
> to listen to reason, that any conversation or contradiction is met with
scorn
> and halted. My conclusion is that these folks are sadly misinformed and
if
> common sense doesn't come into play soon, we will cripple our economy
and
a
> millions of people will be hurt beyond repair. You will see food
shortages,
> fuel shortages and a depression that will dwarf the 1930s.
>
> Here are a few questions to ask these true believers.
>
> What is the perfect temperature for the earth?
>
> All you get from this question is a blank look. The answer is that from
the
> earth's beginning the temperature has always been changing.
>
> How many times has the earth's climate changed in the past?
>
> Again, you get an eye roll and a disdainful comment. According to an
article
> by Derek Kelly, Ph.D., published by the Free Republic in 2005, the
following
> is a snapshot of how the climate has changed in the past.
>
> There is not a definite answer, but experts believe that the climate has
> changed from 17 to 33 times in the last 2 to 3 million years with
glaciations
> periods lasting about 100,000 years followed by warm periods that last
about
> 10,000 years. About 15,000 years ago global warming started and it took
about
> 9,000 years to melt the ice that covered much of North America and
Canada.
> This was not a small sheet of ice, it was hundreds of meters thick and
> covered states like Ohio, Indiana, Minnesota and North Dakotas. The
reason
> for this warming period is unknown.
>
> Six thousand years ago the earth's temperature was about three degrees
warmer
> than today. The Arctic Ocean was ice-free and mountain glaciers had
> disappeared from Norway, the Alps and the Rocky Mountains. The oceans
were
> some three meters higher that today.
>
> From about 4,000 years ago to 900 A.D. global cooling begins. The Arctic
> freezes over and the glaciers return to the Rocky Mountains, Alps and
the
> Black Sea freezes over several times. The sea levels dropped to about
what
> they are today. The earth was about .5 to 1 degree cooler than present.
>
> From 1000 A.D. to 1500 A.D. had a quick, but uneven, warming of the
climate
> of the Northern Hemisphere. The temperatures were about three to eight
> degrees warmer than today. The 11th to the 13th century was much warmer
than
> what the alarmists are predicting today. The reason for this warming is
> unknown.
>
> From around 1430 to 1880 we had periods of fast but uneven cooling in
the
> Northern Hemisphere. This was the period of the mini ice age and 1816
was
the
> year with no summer in the New England area. It even snowed in June and
they
> had widespread crop failure. The reason for this cooling is unknown.
>
> From 1880 to 1940 was a period of warming. Mountain glaciers recede and
the
> ice in the Arctic Ocean begin to melt. What caused this period of
warming?
No
> one seems to know.
>
> From 1940 to 1977 is a period of cooling and the alarmists tell us that
we
> are in a new glaciations period and we are all doomed. What caused this
> cooling?
>
> From 1977 to 2003 is a warming period and we start hearing of global
warming
> and carbon dioxide is the cause. Wow, isn't that amazing that carbon
dioxide
> is now the reason, but we don't know what caused the other warming
periods.
> But remember it must fit the model of greenhouse gases or it doesn't
work
for
> the movement. Anyone see any problems with this logic? The fact is that
the
> current carbon dioxide levels in our atmosphere are at historic lows.
This
> should be our concern, not that we have a carbon dioxide problem. If
carbon
> dioxide continues to decline, then that could lead to some very tough
times
> ahead.
>
> From 2003 to present we are in a slight cooling period, but you wouldn't
know
> it from our media coverage. Remember, global warming or now climate
change
is
> a religion for some and for the founders is a route to harm the USA. All
one
> has to do is research the history of this movement and it's easy to see
the
> fall of communism and the failure of socialism are at the roots of this
> movement. If our leaders cave to the pressure being put forth, then we
are
in
> deep trouble. Just look at what our leaders of the last 30 years have
done
to
> our energy situation. We are in a crisis today because we let these
types
of
> groups dictate our policies. Think of this for a moment! We sit on more
oil
> reserves than is in the Middle East, Europe and South America combined,
but
> our government has made it illegal for us to retrieve it. That's right
-- 
> illegal to retrieve our own natural resources. How stupid is that to
punish
> low- and middle-income Americans with $4 a gallon for gas just to
preserve
> their power. This didn't have to happen, but with our current leader****p
and
> political situation, I don't see any changes coming. The American people
best
> wake up and let the leaders know that we are mad as hell and they will
be
out
> by the next election if something isn't done. That is the only way to
get
> these folks' attention. Threaten their power and they will do what is
needed
> for the common people.
>
> If you are caught up in this climate change movement, you best rethink
you
> position. After all, it's pretty arrogant of man to think he can change
the
> universe and pretty stupid of man to think that the climate has never
changed
> before. A sobering thought is that 90 percent of the last several
million
> years has had glaciations and warming only 10 percent of the time. Odds
are
> it will get cold before it gets warm. One needs to get real on this
issue
> because if we don't, then your kids and grandkids are going to be the
ones
> that pay the price. The price will be very ugly and America will be no
more!
>
> - Rudy Rinker lives in Springfield and is single copy sales manager with
the
> News-Leader Media Group.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Why does the radical left ban things that are harmless or go
"robw" <nodd  2008-06-17 20:57:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 14:01:03 CST 2008.