Under the misguided approach of fraternization at all costs the Sparts
condemn the nationalist side of the Russian resistance and criticize
stalinism for its patriotism and its 'kill all germans line'...
In an ideal world people would all be friends, take drugs and sleep
with each others wives. The lcd induced 'free love' degenerate Sparts
are baffled with this Russian position.
When Ilya Ehrenburg produced poetry encouraging Russian to kill any
and every German they could find the Sparts would condemn this as
stalinist extremism. As if the defence of the USSR could be extreme in
any way? The stalinists were too kind to the German invaders,
decapitating their own side before they invaded, providing the Germans
with oil prior to their European invasions, sup****ting the Nazi-Soviet
pact to the letter even after the Germans were keen on breaking it,
offerring surrender notifications to General Paulus army which was
surrounded in Stalingrad. If the stalinists were extremist
nationalists they would have done nothing of the above. Like a
bureaucrat who is forced to go on strike and then when excesses start
by management is obliged to defend his employees and remembers that a
class struggle exists, the stalinists were never pro-active when it
came to German fascism. They were reactive. It is noteworthy to note
they have never commented on a few issues regarding Russian history
a) Pipes alleges to have do***ents highlighting the brutality of Lenin
given to him in the early 1990's by Russian... defectors.
b) the Stasi files are constantly being 're-opened' to show a whole
manner of things the latest being they were running ****o production
for the higher echelons of the East german bureaucracy.
c)recent books allegedly showing the brutality of Soviet soldiers in
WW2.
Which leaves open the question whose positions do they truly defend?
