Re: Vngels' defends this, the last "workers" state.

On Apr 20, 10:01=A0am, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=3D/news/2008/04/19/wchin...=

>
> China's last Maoists submit to capitalism
>
> By Richard Spencer in Beijing
> Last Updated: 3:26am BST 19/04/2008
>
> According to one re****t, the bank had been instructed to sup****t
> Nanjie at all costs by a conservative in the Communist Party
> leader****p after the crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests in
> 1989.

That "conservatives" (i.e. orthodox Stalinists) can continue to exert
this kind of influence sup****ts a workers state theory of present-day
China. What reason would a reigning bourgeoisie have to allow an old-
line Stalinist such actual influence?

srd