On Apr 21, 3:30 pm, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 5:44 am, Vngelis <meberr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 21, 1:30 pm, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 21, 2:00 am, Vngelis <meberr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > You should read the stuff by Stalin if you want a real kick...
>
> > > David
>
> > Equating stalinism with US imperialism was never a marxist policy as
> > understood by Trotsky whose marxism you allege to sup****t.
> > Hence sup****ting and promoting cold warriors like Blunden does on this
> > site including the Bomb Belgrade neo-con crusader Zisek has as much to
> > do with marxism as I have with
aliens.http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/
>
> > What is occurring is in reality an attempt to marry the classics of
> > marxism with current gangsters, namely the Texan oil crowd and the
> > Wall Street financiers...
>
> > This after all is what MIA has become, not what it was originally
> > about. Like most things it degenerates once it has no principles...
>
> There is ZERO difference between the MIA of 1997 and now. Zero. If
> Zisek has something to do as a non-Marxist ON Marxism then he goes up
> on the MIA. It's why we have Adam Smith, Agust Blanqi, Max Eastmen,
> etc on the MIA, and always have had them on the MIA.
>
> As to "Texas Oil" crowd...if this is the case you are a charter member
> of the Nazi party and murderer. If you continue to draw *totally*
> unsubstantiated "links", something no Marxist ever did to their
> politcial opponents, you are a Nazi pig, after all, you do hold the
> same position on immigration as Nazis. So, therefore, using your own
> method, you are a Nazi.
>
> If you want to stop drawing foolish links as you do and engage in a
> real debate over policy, that could be done. The MIA of which I am a
> volunteer, doen't promote *anyone* except perhaps the people whose
> photos are on the main page and therefore symbolically draw's peoples
> attention to them (as they are linked to their own archive).
>
> David
The bottom line will always remain I critiqued MIA for its policy of
putting clowns in charge of sites like the Lenin one.
I was then told to go look up the biographies. I did. What did I find
the main archiver of Lenin (Bagsen) states openly he is an anti-
bolshevik which begs the question why was he interested in the project
at all. From past experience this may have to do with
a) having access codes in order to pass on information for those who
look up the site
b) choose what will show Lenin in a bad light like the fabricated ****
Robert Service has 'found' showing Lenin to be a mass murderer
c) to push editorial policy in line with rotten bourgeois academia
which is on a renewed path against marxism by characters promoted on
your site...
Now the coincidence between me looking up the biography and being
taken down in between is indeed amazing. Its a feature of operators
who cover their tracks. Nothing new in that. The only problem is that
in the day of the internet it is tracked and logged. Neo-stalinism has
a problem surviving in such an environment.
vngelis
|
