On Apr 22, 3:36 pm, Vngelis <meberr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 11:29 pm, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 2:55 pm, Vngelis <meberr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 22, 8:35 pm, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Want to discuss Chinese cops as part of the occupation of
> > > > Haiti...doing the bidding the US? Your turn...you just love
defending
> > > > capitalism and cops don't you?
>
> > > > David
>
> > > The class nature of a state isn't determined by what they do in the
> > > UN.
> > > Russia was in Austria until 1955 and defended private property
there.
> > > Stick to what you do best. Defending US imperialism in decline.
> > > vngelis
>
> > I actually agree with you on the issue of the cops. But it dosn't mean
> > the Chinese gov't are not running dogs for US imperialism in this
> > instance. I should feel somehow different when Haitians KILL these
> > occupiers vs that of, say, the Brazilians or other puppets? do you
> > even take a position to defend Haiti against occupation?
>
> > You rather ridiculous puff-balls of Stalinist slander about 'defending
> > US imperialism' only get nods from Maoists and their ilk. You need to
> > discuss *politics* and not make up positions to make yourself look
> > like you might be on the right side of the class line.
>
> > Do you stand for the withdrawal of US impeiralism AND their lackeys
> > from Haiti: Yes or No?
>
> > David
>
> > David
>
> The question you now ask has nothing to do with what was being argued
> previously.
> I dont sup****t the presence of Chinese troops in US occupations
> anywhere, bar Mitrovica.
> There are no maoists on here so who are you referring to?
> China has defended the USA on North Korean talks as well which I
> consider to be reactionary as well.
> vngelis
My point about this as China continues unabatted into crony
capitalism, the capitalist ideas of 'stability' 'free trade'
'investment' will continue to bring the interests of counter-
revolution on their part and the US part closer and closer. This is
what is happening despite larger strategic differences. but at least
you agree the Chinese are "reactionary".
David
|
