Re: BROWN ANSWERS NATO CALL

On May 1, 3:14 pm, Vngelis <meberr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 1, 10:18 pm, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 30, 9:37 pm, dusty <trackdu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > From someone who sup****ts the imperialist-globalist programme of
> > > flooding labour markets with immigrants this is rich indeed.
>
> > Unlike you Dusty, I actually work against globalization and guess
> > worker programs. Did you even READ the post on the Mexican demand for
> > "The right NOT emigrate"? Guess not. Do you actually do anything
> > against globalization?
>
> > David
>
> Having spent the last ten years calling for no borders and workers to
> emigrate you know are calling for the exact opposite?
> I would call that sinister. Its like attempting to undermine every
> social struggle by infiltrating it with globalist bull****.
>
> One cant argue for two opposite poles ie to seek higher living
> standards by bankrupting the workers, this is what the bosses do by
> arguing that things get better whilst workers starve.
> vngelis

Find one quote or even "implication" which says I'm "FOR" emigration.
You are so pitiful in projection your own POV on people it's beyond
bull****. I defend the right of workers, like ALL Marxists before me,
for workers to live where they want against capitalist immigration
rules. To be against globalization you have to be totally opposed to
guest worker programs and schemes. But the ONLY way to fight
globalization is to organize the class beginning with out own
organizations, the unions.

You might want to define "social struggle" since this coming from you
could mean being for a 'social' struggle initiated by the British
National Party or the National Front in France (since you have their
politics).

D.