On May 3, 5:32 pm, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 3, 8:43 am, Einde O'Callaghan <einde.ocallag...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> interkom.de> wrote:
> > Vngelis wrote:
> > > On May 1, 10:19 pm, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> On May 1, 1:49 pm, Vngelis <meberr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >>> From Pravda forum....
> > >>> The World Bankers Plan to Split the USA in 5 Parts
> > >>> They want to make a Latin American State inside the USA....
> > >>> A Black American State somewhere in the South
> > >>> An Aryan North European State in the East
> > >>> A Mutt State of all the mixed races
> > >>> and
> > >>> A Asiatics State some where in the North West...
> > >>> They figure Competition between these smaller states will make the
US
> > >>> more
> > >>> Productive and not just a parasitic state , a wellfare state,
feeding
> > >>> on the efforts, production, and good-will of all the other
countries
> > >>> in the world..
> > >> I'd love to see where this one came from! Sources please...
>
> > >> David- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Pravda forum english
>
> > A wonderfully authoritative source - sounds a bit like APST.
>
> > Einde O'Callaghan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Well, at least he admits it's not athoritative...just another
> 'projection' probably from some wishful thinking Stalinist. But, one
> thing he says that could, of couse, come to pass: "The US breaking
> apart under it's own weight". But that's like predicting "There will
> be a revolution in the US in the future"...kind of like a suckers bet.
> IF the US goes completely bankrupt and the corresponding class
> reaction is big enough, and has actual leader****p and is not just
> sponteneous (or even if it was) yes, the US "could" break apart. But
> there are simply zero indication that the state would actually get
> weaker. I think it would get stronger, bigger and more deadly.
>
> David
So the strength of the state is in direct pro****tion to the loss of
its economic base in particular AFTER it is declared bankrupt?
Is that analogous to the theory that the price of labour remains
static or even rises when the the volume of labour increases?
One cant say you aint original when it comes to destroying the basics
of marxism.
vngelis
|
