Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Trotsky Socialism > Re: Ted Turner=...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 33 Topic 3458 of 3947
Post > Topic >>

Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million

by Vngelis <meberry68@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM

Daniele they have beaten you to it in terms of population reduction!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------

 Eco Group Calls For "Voluntary Human Extinction"
Says m***** should be indoctrinated to stop having children in order
that the human race can die out and save the planet


Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Monday, May 12, 2008


Propel This! - Submit to Propeller.com

StumbleUpon

An environmental group says it's sole purpose is to recruit volunteers
and educate enough people to eventually realize that the human race
needs to completely die out in order that the planet can survive.

The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT) says humans need to
stop breeding and voluntarily progress our own slow demise in order
that plants, animals and fragile ecosystems can survive.

The group's motto is "May we live long and die out". Their website
explains their commitment to a long term goal of convincing the
population of Earth that it has no future:

    It has been suggested that there are only two chances of everyone
volunteering to stop breeding: slim and none. The odds may be against
preserving life on Earth, but the decision to stop reproducing is
still the morally correct one. Indeed, the likelihood of our failure
to avoid the massive die off which humanity is engineering is a very
good reason to not sentence another of us to life. The future isn't
what it used to be.

    Even if our chances of succeeding were only one in a hundred, we
would have to try. Giving up and allowing humanity to take its course
is unconscionable. There is far too much at stake.

    The Movement may be considered a success each time one more of us
volunteers to breed no more.

The movement is at pains to explain that it does not advocate suicide,
abortion, mass murder, or any form of FORCED population control, yet
it does advocate a total reduction in human population down to zero:

    VHEMT Sup****ters favor this goal, while Volunteers see extinction
as the only sure way to avoid breeding ourselves back to today's
density.

The group rejects being labeled Malthusian or Eugenicist because in
their words, they "care about life on planet Earth":

    VHEMT (pronounced vehement) is a movement not an organization.
It's a movement advanced by people who care about life on planet
Earth. We're not just a bunch of misanthropes and anti-social,
Malthusian misfits, taking morbid delight whenever disaster strikes
humans. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Voluntary human
extinction is the humanitarian alternative to human disasters.

The group maintains that human do not have a place in nature and have
become parasitic:

    The fossil record shows that each time Homo sapiens entered a
continent, a spasm of extinctions followed. Exotic invaders typically
disrupt ecosystems, and we are no exception.

    On some philosophical level there is no doubt some truth feeding
the myth. However, by examining our daily lives, and asking ourselves,
"What part of my normal day is a part of Nature?" the sad truth is
revealed.

(Article continues below)

A further read around the VHEMT site leaves a very sour taste for
anyone who happens not to agree that the human race should be
systematically wiped out. This movement is very calculated in its
unwavering explanation and rationalization of an eventuality totally
at odds with the history of evolution. It even appeals to different
philosophies and religions and attempts to use their dogma to bolster
it's own views.

In an interview with World Net Daily, a spokesperson for the group,
going under the pseudonym Les U. Knight, highlights the pure
doublethink that one must engage in in order to come to the
conclusions this group do:

    "It's an idea, and it's not transferred genetically," he said. "We
aren't born knowing we should go extinct; we have to learn it. We
don't need to create new humans in order to indoctrinate them from
birth. All of us come from breeding couples, and yet we've decided not
to breed."

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this group is that it equates
itself with a general freedom movement. describing it's ideal as
"reproductive freedom" rather than "population control". However a
thorough read through their material makes it clear that the group is
intent on imposing its views on people in order to change their
mindset, whether they like it or not.

In their opening message the group states:

    We don't carry on about how the human race has shown itself to be
a greedy, amoral parasite on the once-healthy face of this planet.

Yet in the very next section they state:

    Great progress will be made toward improving the quality of life
on Earth by countering greed with responsibility, ignorance with
education, and oppression with freedom.

And in following sections:

    We were once like the otter, part of the ecosystem. Then we
developed agriculture, and have become parasitic, depending on
exploitation of Nature for our survival, but giving nothing back.

We have previously warned how "green" groups have attempted to
associate climate change and environmental problems with over
population and suggest that the solution is to implement depopulation
policies and punishments for those who flout them.

People are indeed being indoctrinated to think that reproducing is bad
for the planet.

This outlook is being seized upon by a globalist elite whose raison
d=92etre is to control and restrict our growth and progress for their
own benefit. As Alex Jones do***ents in his seminal do***entary End
Game, this mindset is endemic amongst the elite.

This hijacking of eco groups and activists alike and is intended to
push a green fraud to mask the agenda to mold a worldwide neo
feudalist society where a global body regulates and micro manages
every aspect of our lives down to when we can and cannot move around
and when we can and cannot reproduce.
 




 33 Posts in Topic:
Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Vngelis <meberry68@[EM  2008-05-09 02:05:09 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Vngelis <meberry68@[EM  2008-05-09 02:07:45 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Vngelis <meberry68@[EM  2008-05-09 02:26:20 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
dusty <trackdusty@[EMA  2008-05-09 05:38:42 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
dave.walters@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 10:07:20 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
dave.walters@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 10:10:19 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-10 03:09:39 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
nada <dwaltersMIA@[EMA  2008-05-09 22:07:59 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-10 07:52:12 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Vngelis <meberry68@[EM  2008-05-10 08:01:39 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-11 07:16:58 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-11 14:05:06 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
"Stephen R. Diamond&  2008-05-10 18:06:07 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-11 07:19:14 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
nada <dwaltersMIA@[EMA  2008-05-10 18:07:28 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
nada <dwaltersMIA@[EMA  2008-05-11 02:01:05 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
"Stephen R. Diamond&  2008-05-11 16:56:31 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-11 23:26:56 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
nada <dwaltersMIA@[EMA  2008-05-11 18:59:43 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-14 23:53:43 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Vngelis <meberry68@[EM  2008-05-13 12:59:56 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-15 00:25:00 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
nada <dwaltersMIA@[EMA  2008-05-13 16:31:53 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Vngelis <meberry68@[EM  2008-05-14 01:10:26 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
dusty <trackdusty@[EMA  2008-05-14 07:22:43 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
nada <dwaltersMIA@[EMA  2008-05-14 08:31:23 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
stephen <srdiamond@[EM  2008-05-14 12:15:19 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
stephen <srdiamond@[EM  2008-05-14 12:41:59 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Daniele Futtorovic <da  2008-05-15 00:44:02 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
dusty <trackdusty@[EMA  2008-05-14 19:10:13 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
dusty <trackdusty@[EMA  2008-05-14 19:30:40 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
nada <dwaltersMIA@[EMA  2008-05-15 08:27:49 
Re: Ted Turner=Limiting Population to 250Million
Vngelis <meberry68@[EM  2008-05-15 12:40:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Sep 7 18:26:46 CDT 2008.