On May 16, 3:34 pm, Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On 2008-05-16 00:23 +0100, Vngelis allegedly wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sichuan earthquake: Update on dams and nuclear sites
>
> > As we told you earlier, there had been very real fears that the
> > Zipingba Dam, 6 miles upstream from the devastated city of Dujiangyan,
> > was displaying "extremely dangerous" cracks. The People's Daily is now
> > re****ting that the dam is "structurally stable and safe" following a
> > full inspection.
>
> > "The conclusion was reached after a panel of experts, led by Jiao
> > Yong, Vice Minister of Water Resources, rushed to the site and made a
> > thorough inspection of the 156-meter-high facility."
>
> > Nevertheless, despite official reassurances, fears persist over other
> > dam projects in the area with The Associated Press still re****ting
> > that hundreds of structures could be at risk.
>
> > "The National Development Reform Commission, China's top economic
> > planning body, said the earthquake had damaged 391 dams. It said two
> > of the dams were large ones, 28 were medium-sized and the rest were
> > small ones."
>
> > Landslides have re****tedly caused rivers to be blocked in Qingchuan
> > County, creating an enormous lake, with Xinhua quoting Li Hao, the
> > county's Communist Party chief, as saying: "The rising water could
> > cause the mountains to collapse. We desperately need geological
> > experts to carry out tests and fix a rescue plan". As the
> > International Herald Tribune points out, "much depends on efforts to
> > reduce the menacing pressure of water behind the dam walls", if
> > further disaster is to be averted.
>
> > In addition, The Guardian says that two hydropower stations in Maoxian
> > County have been affected, although the extent of the damage is not
> > yet clear. Meanwhile, Guangyuan and Mianyang, near the quake
> > epicentre, house plants that help process plutonium for nuclear arms,
> > although the China Nuclear Engineering & Construction Cor****ation
> > currently states that, despite some damage to buildings in the area,
> > there are no major concerns at this time regarding nuclear material.
>
> Nostradamus-tactic. Guess widly and as much as you can, some of it might
> turn out true.
> Which is why you can't emphasize often enough that science isn't about
> the results, but about the *method*.
>
>
> >http://shanghaiist.com/2008/05/15/zipingba_dam_st.php
>
> Sic! Those lapdogs really hate it when competing countries have their
> own sources of energy...
>
> --
> DF.
> in the FROM address from "invalid" to "net"
There is an economic war with China over the value of the Renmimbi and
Burma has been under sanctions.
These are the politics which lead to conflict.
Walters and the state caps all argue there is no conflict as
capitalism is triumphant everywhere hence they dismiss weather war
weaponry as ...conspiratorial
Much in the same manner as they alibi the 'war on terror' by
presenting Osama as being real...
vngelis
|
