Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

On May 18, 6:14=A0am, stephen <srdiam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 17, 5:22 am, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > I think there is a mild issue of paranoia going on with people who
> > come up with stuff like this. But it's not a disease, it's must
> > insecurity or something similiar.
>
> I think you are focusing too much on the threatening content that
> dominates their preoccupations. If it were only a matter of pre-
> occupation with threat and over-attentiveness to low-probability
> threats, it would signify nothing more than anxiety, although probably
> of clinical severity. The more pathological symptom is in their
> assigning outlier a priori probabilities to events. These differences
> do not result from a difference in opinion but precede and form its
> basis. When these paranoid personalities form a theory on limited
> evidence, all subsequent evidence becomes channeled as confirmatory.
> Most people are annoying obtuse about seeing contradictions between
> their theories and reality, but these paranoid conspirativists are
> utterly incapable of it. This is clinical paranoia.
>
> The left must learn that it need not debate the insane, whether they
> suffer from paranoid personality disorder or homo***uality.
>
> srd

Clinical eh?

What would you recommend Doc? Pre-frontal lobotomy, shock therapy or
just large dodes of the latest chemotherapeutant?

And for those who, who despite all the evidence for the possibility of
conspiracy are annoyingly obtuse in admitting the possibility of it?

I think a second opinion is called for. Calling Dr DF...Dr DF!