Re: Myanmar Cyclone is Artificial?

On May 18, 4:51=A0am, Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On 2008-05-18 00:44 +0100, nada allegedly wrote:
>
>
>
> > Well, no, not exactly. The fact that there are like maybe 2 workers
> > states anywhere in the world (Cuba and N.Korea...the last one being
> > questionable btw) is not the point. In fact, it goes more =A0our
British=

> > globalist Vngelis's POV that an "economic war" exists between China
> > and the US goes to China's capitalist nature more than anything else.
> > Of course if it was a 'war' you'd see the US treating China like N.
> > Korea or Burma, clearly something it does not do. US investment in
> > China has about doubled every year for 10 years and the Chinese are
> > tied to the US economy to the tune of 30% of their GNP, so hardly a
> > 'war'. Ah...'competition' is what it is, similiarly to two rival
> > capitalist states.
>
> IMO it /is/ competition between two capitalist states, or between one
> capitalist state and one nigh-capitalist one. But how isn't that a war?
>
> --
> DF.
> to reply privately, change the top-level domain
> in the FROM address from "invalid" to "net"

Because neither side is either accusing each other of something or not
competing within the realm of capitalist trade relations. There is
only manouvering to gain profit. That's not war. It could lead to war
but that would like a real war fought by other means: quotas, tarrifs,
cutting off trade, boycotts etc...like the US does with Burma now. The
US loves China because the ruling class is making too much money
barrowing from it, investing in it, trading with it, etc. Hardly looks
like a war to me.

David