Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

On May 18, 12:32 pm, Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On 2008-05-18 00:21 +0100, dusty allegedly wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 18, 6:14 am, stephen <srdiam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On May 17, 5:22 am, nada <dwalters...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> I think there is a mild issue of paranoia going on with people who
> >>> come up with stuff like this. But it's not a disease, it's must
> >>> insecurity or something similiar.
> >> I think you are focusing too much on the threatening content that
> >> dominates their preoccupations. If it were only a matter of pre-
> >> occupation with threat and over-attentiveness to low-probability
> >> threats, it would signify nothing more than anxiety, although
probably
> >> of clinical severity. The more pathological symptom is in their
> >> assigning outlier a priori probabilities to events. These differences
> >> do not result from a difference in opinion but precede and form its
> >> basis. When these paranoid personalities form a theory on limited
> >> evidence, all subsequent evidence becomes channeled as confirmatory.
> >> Most people are annoying obtuse about seeing contradictions between
> >> their theories and reality, but these paranoid conspirativists are
> >> utterly incapable of it. This is clinical paranoia.
>
> >> The left must learn that it need not debate the insane, whether they
> >> suffer from paranoid personality disorder or homo***uality.
>
> >> srd
>
> > Clinical eh?
>
> > What would you recommend Doc? Pre-frontal lobotomy, shock therapy or
> > just large dodes of the latest chemotherapeutant?
>
> Amen. Don't forget those drugs they feed kids on these days, to fight
> "attention deficits", "hyperactivity", "disruptive behaviour" or
> whatchacallit that are perfectly normal attitudes when confronted with
> idiotic surroundings. Poor souls.
>
> > And for those who, who despite all the evidence for the possibility of
> > conspiracy are annoyingly obtuse in admitting the possibility of it?
>
> > I think a second opinion is called for. Calling Dr DF...Dr DF!
>
> SRD's attitude on this matter is a puzzle to me. I mean, that the bulk
> of the population believes the hype is one thing, especially when they
> have never been confronted with alternative views. Then, that some
> people fight alternative views is understandable, if they have an
> interest in the integrity of the system, or simply are paid for it. But
> that someone who claims to be an opponent of the system would attack
> people for their alternative views, and not even for some *content* of
> these views, but for *having* an alternative view in the first place;
> not merely disagreeing with it, but actively pursuing it... that's one
> hell of a poser.
> I tried to understand it once, but it went nowhere, as we got stuck in
> the discussion and me personally fed up with some aspects of Stephen's
> way of arguing... :shrug:.
>
> --
> DF.
> to reply privately, change the top-level domain
> in the FROM address from "invalid" to "net"

But I think you are mistakenly assuming SRD is against the system?
IN the days of his youth he may have been.
But this war is about Arabs and what the Americans call the 'jewish'
state in the Middle East as well as the collapse of the USA.
The jewish academia that got involved in politics after France 1968
are dead and buried.
The WRP made its peace with Arafat and missed the growth of Hamas and
Hizbollah.
Their Greek sup****ters in Savvas Michael have made their peace with
Zisek and the new cold warriors promoted by MIA, and university
departments of imperialism in decline.

As for the bit about the youth, at least you recognise what is going
on, to your credit.
1.5 million are on Ritalin nowadays in the UK.
Its a war against children. Only yesterday I heard they want child
minders to track infants with 70odd checklist questions. What they do,
who they play fight with, who they meet when they are taken to the
park to play at the swings etc. In order to start prosecuting the
child minders or the parents depending on where they want to take it.
Spying amongst people, or calling them ...insane in order to prescribe
medication by the 'medical establishment' which in times of crisis
reverts to norm. Unable to explain or offer solutions to the crisis
they enlist the union bureaucracies to 'control' the youth by drugging
them indefinitely.
vngelis