Re: Myanmar Cyclone is Artificial?

On May 18, 12:48 pm, Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On 2008-05-17 20:27 +0100, Vngelis allegedly wrote:
>
> > There is an economic war with China over the value of the Renmimbi and
> > Burma has been under sanctions.
>
> > These are the politics which lead to conflict.
>
> > Walters and the state caps all argue  there is no conflict as
> > capitalism is triumphant everywhere hence they dismiss weather war
> > weaponry as ...conspiratorial
>
> I don't think they've got the technical means to create such a cyclone
> artificially, either. I'd very much agree, however, that IF they had
> them, they'd certainly use them.
> But how im****tant would such weapons be? Not all that, in my view. Mind,
> they've killed millions of Iraqis with the very much conventional
> weapons called "diplomacy" and "economic sanctions".
>
> --
> DF.
> to reply privately, change the top-level domain
> in the FROM address from "invalid" to "net"

I think you may have misunderstood what I said.
They may be able to artificially excarcabate a situation.
It is noted already that the Chinese are able to create rain clouds.
If a cyclone is developing and with the use of weaponry they can
excarcabate it artificially they aren't necessarily 'creating' weather
but making it worse.

Do you belive Katrina as it evolved was a man made disaster or as
Spike Lee has commented the city was flooded by blowing up the defence
walls surrounding it?

For I have noticed the Americans try and test their weapon
manipulation equipment on themselves first then they globalise it.
Katrina inaugurated weather wars, climate change in our faces and
climate change refugees. We are now going into new realms.
Environmental intervention as an evolution of humanitarian
intervention. Imperiliasm rebranding itself...
vngelis