Re: How low can you sink? [WAS: Re: HAARP: High Frequency Active

On May 18, 1:17=A0pm, John Holmes <jhol...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Stephen hasn't committed this particular little APST atrocity in quite
> a while.
>
> He should go back on his meds.

I have recently wondered about your view of apst atrocities and your
willness to allow your exaggerated fear of the bourgeois state to
dictate what you will discuss.I think the label a mere excuse to avoid
a topic you cannot rationally discuss. Or a bad position you simply
don't want to defend. Unfortunately, your stance tends to make
discussion worthless, because one cannot consider questions in
isolation or have a rational discussion when certain avenues are
closed. Thus, I consider it a far greater crime against freedom to
avoid topics because of their suspected implications or because of
your personal uncertainty about the proper resolution--as you admit to
doing--than to argue  that homo***uality is a mental illness.

srd
>
> -jh-
>
>
>
> On Sun, 18 May 2008, Daniele Futtorovic wrote:
> > On 2008-05-18 19:46 +0100, stephen allegedly wrote:
> >> On May 17, 3:21 pm, dusty <trackdu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> Clinical eh?
>
> >>> What would you recommend Doc? Pre-frontal lobotomy, shock therapy or
> >>> just large dodes of the latest chemotherapeutant?
>
> >> What do YOU recommend for homo***uals, since I think you
approximately
> >> share my views on that category? Even under modern bourgeois
> >> democracies, the =A0presence of even overt psychosis does not justify
> >> imposing treatment. The issue here is to protect socialism from
> >> adaptation to those who purposes are necessarily sectarian in the
> >> extreme, as Engels recognized with respect to homo***uality.
>
> >> srd
>
> > O_O
>
> > Socialism needs to be protected from... homo***uals. SRD's on a
crusade =
to
> > preserve the hetero***uality of socialism.
>
> > This is getting better and better... NOT!
>
> > --
> > DF.
> > to reply privately, change the top-level domain
> > in the FROM address from "invalid" to "net"